libavutil/riscv: Make use of elf_aux_info() on FreeBSD / OpenBSD riscv
FreeBSD/OpenBSD riscv have elf_aux_info().
Signed-off-by: Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com>
Signed-off-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@remlab.net>
The half-baked assembler in Clang 16 and earlier can't process our
RISC-V assembler. This adds yet another work around that.
If you must use Clang, please use version 17 or later.
F and D extensions are included in all RISC-V application profiles ever
made (so starting from RV64GC a.k.a. RVA20). Realistically they need to be
selected at compilation time.
Currently, there are no consumers for these two flags. If there is ever a
need to reintroduce F- or D-specific optimisations, we can always use
__riscv_f or __riscv_d compiler predefined macros respectively.
Unlike x86, fmin/fmax are single instructions, not function calls. They
are much much faster than doing a comparison, then branching based on its
results. With this, audiodsp.vector_clipf gets almost twice as fast, and
a properly unrollled version of it gets 4-5x faster, on SiFive-U74.
This is only the low-hanging fruit: FFMIN and FFMAX are presumably
affected as well.
This likely applies to other instruction sets with native IEEE floats,
especially those lacking a conditional select instruction.
This instruction, if aligned on a 4-byte boundary, defines a valid target
("landing pad") for an indirect call or jump. Since this instruction is a
HINT, it is safe to assemble even if not included in the target
instruction set architecture.
The necessary alignment is already provided by the `func` macro. However
this still lacks the ELF attribute to indicate that the zicfilp is supported
in simple mode. This is left for future work as the ELF specification is not
ratified as of yet.
This will also nonobviously require the assembler to support zicfilp,
insofar as the `tail` pseudo-instruction shall clobber T2 (instead of T1) as
its temporary register.
Currently the start of the byte range for each function is aligned to
4 bytes. But this can lead to situations whence the function is preceded
by a 2-byte C.NOP at the aligned 4-byte boundary. Then the first actual
instruction and the function symbol are only aligned on 2 bytes.
This forcefully disables compression for the alignment and the symbol,
thus ensuring that there is no padding before the function.
The B extension was finally ratified in May 2024, encompassing:
- Zba (addresses),
- Zbb (basics) and
- Zbs (single bits).
It does not include Zbc (base-2 polynomials).
configure checks that the assembler supports the B extension (or rather
its constituents) anyway. These macros were dodging sanity checks for
unsupported instructions and nothing else.
The RISC-V B bit manipulation extension was ratified only two months ago.
But it is strictly equivalent to the union of the zba, zbb and zbs
extensions which were defined almost 3 years earlier. Rather than require
new assembler, we can just match the extension name manually and translate
it into its constituent parts.
If __riscv_hwprobe() fails, then the kernel version is presumably too
old. There is not much point falling back to the auxillary vector.
- The Linux kernel requires I, so the flag is always set on Linux, and
run-time detection is unnecessary. Our RISC-V assembler does anyway not
support targets without I.
- Linux can compile with or without F and D, but it cannot perform
run-time detection for them (a kernel with F support will not boot a
processor without F). The run-time detection is thus useless in that
case. Besides F and D extensions are used throughout the C code, so
their run-time detection would not be practical.
- Support for V was added in a later kernel version than riscv_hwprobe(),
so the system call will always be available if the kernel supports V.
The only exception would be vendor kernel forks, but those are known to
haphasardly pretend to support V on systems without actual V support, or
with only pre-ratification binary-incompatible version. Furthermore, a
large chunk of our optimisations require Zba and/or Zbb which cannot be
detected with HWCAP in those kernels.
For what it is worth, OpenJDK already took a similar action. Note that this
keeps AT_HWCAP usage for platforms with neither C run-time <sys/hwprobe.h>
nor kernel <asm/hwprobe.h>, notably kernels other than Linux.
This adds runtime support to use Zbb REV8 for 32- and 64-bit byte-wise
swaps. The result is about five times slower than if targetting Zbb
statically, but still a lot faster than the default bespoke C code or a
call to GCC run-time functions.
For 16-bit swap, this is however unsurprisingly a lot worse, and so this
sticks to the baseline. In fact, even using REV8 statically does not
seem to be beneficial in that case.
Zbb static Zbb dynamic I baseline
bswap16: 0.668184765 3.340764069 0.668029012
bswap32: 0.668174014 3.340763319 9.353855435
bswap64: 0.668221765 3.340496313 14.698672283
(seconds for 1 billion iterations on a SiFive-U74 core)
Due to hysterical raisins, most RISC-V Linux distributions target a
RV64GC baseline excluding the Bit-manipulation ISA extensions, most
notably:
- Zba: address generation extension and
- Zbb: basic bit manipulation extension.
Most CPUs that would make sense to run FFmpeg on support Zba and Zbb
(including the current FATE runner), so it makes sense to optimise for
them. In fact a large chunk of existing assembler optimisations relies
on Zba and/or Zbb.
Since we cannot patch shared library code, the next best thing is to
carry a flag initialised at load-time and check it on need basis.
This results in 3 instructions overhead on isolated use, e.g.:
1: AUIPC rd, %pcrel_hi(ff_rv_zbb_supported)
LBU rd, %pcrel_lo(1b)(rd)
BEQZ rd, non_Zbb_fallback_code
// Zbb code here
The C compiler will typically load the flag ahead of time to reducing
latency, and can also keep it around if Zbb is used multiple times in a
single optimisation scope. For this to work, the flag symbol must be
hidden; otherwise the optimisation degrades with a GOT look-up to
support interposition:
1: AUIPC rd, GOT_OFFSET_HI
LD rd, GOT_OFFSET_LO(rd)
LBU rd, (rd)
BEQZ rd, non_Zbb_fallback_code
// Zbb code here
This patch adds code to provision the flag in libraries using bit
manipulation functions from libavutil: byte-swap, bit-weight and
counting leading or trailing zeroes.
vtype_vli computes the VTYPE value with the optimal LMUL for a given
element width, tail and mask policies and a run-time vector length.
vtype_ivli does the same, but with the compile-time constant vector
length.
vwtypei and vntypei can be used to widen or narrow a VTYPE value for
use in mixed-width vector-optimised functions.
The B Bit manipulation extension was not defined to this day, and
probably never will. Instead it was broken down into Zba, Zbb, Zbc and
Zbs with no particular blessed set to make up B.
This removes the bogus field test. Linux never set this bit, nor
(AFAICT) did FreeBSD or any other OS. We can always add it back in the
unlikely event that it gets taken into use.
Not all C run-times support this, and even then, it will be a while
before distributions provide recent enough versions thereof.
Since this is a trivial system call wrapper, we might just as well call
the corresponding kernel system call directly where the C run-time lacks
support but the kernel headers are new enough (as is the case on Debian
Unstable at the time of writing). In doing so, we need to add a few more
guards as the first suitable kernel (headers) release did not expose the
V, Zba and Zbb extensions.
This adds the Linux-specific function call to detect CPU features. Unlike
the more portable auxillary vector, this supports extensions other than
single lettered ones. At this point, FFmpeg already needs this to detect
Zba and Zbb at run-time, and probably will need it for Zvbb in the near
future.
Support will be available in glibc 2.40 onward.
Gathers are (unsurprisingly) a notable exception to the rule that R-V V
gets faster with larger group multipliers. So roll the function to speed
it up.
Before:
vector_fmul_reverse_fixed_c: 2840.7
vector_fmul_reverse_fixed_rvv_i32: 2430.2
After:
vector_fmul_reverse_fixed_c: 2841.0
vector_fmul_reverse_fixed_rvv_i32: 962.2
It might be possible to further optimise the function by moving the
reverse-subtract out of the loop and adding ad-hoc tail handling.
