mirror of https://github.com/ceph/go-ceph
291 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
291 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
# go-ceph - Development Guide
|
|
|
|
## Preface
|
|
|
|
This document is aimed at providing a brief introduction to the structure and
|
|
development processes used by the go-ceph project. It is aimed at people who
|
|
wish to improve go-ceph. We assume familiarity with the Go language and common
|
|
tooling as well as some familiarity with C. We hope this document is useful but
|
|
can't guarantee it's always up to date. It will never be totally comprehensive.
|
|
|
|
This document tries to focus on items that may not be obvious by reading the
|
|
code itself. One can go very far by simply reading the code and sticking with
|
|
what has been observed. However, this doc tries to give a bit more of a
|
|
background "philosophy" that hopefully reveals some part of why we do certain
|
|
things we do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Theme
|
|
|
|
The primary theme behind go-ceph is one of providing access to Ceph's
|
|
functionality via Go as a library of API functions and types. We desire to
|
|
expose the full power of the Ceph APIs - this means that we generally aim to
|
|
provide a thin layer of code over the APIs provided by Ceph itself. We try to
|
|
do enough to make a user of Go feel like go-ceph is a (mostly) idiomatic Go
|
|
library. We also strive to make someone familiar with the Ceph APIs recognize
|
|
what C functions are being mapped to Go.
|
|
|
|
While we may provide some convenience layers we generally plan to provide access
|
|
to all of the Ceph APIs on a near 1:1 basis. When we do provide convenience
|
|
layers we do not mean to make them the exclusive tool-set provided.
|
|
|
|
While the focus so far has been accessing APIs in C in Go, the true target of
|
|
go-ceph is to express Ceph functionality in Go. As such, not every feature
|
|
of go-ceph may be found in the C API. A small but growing set of features
|
|
build upon parts of Ceph that make use of the C APIs but do more than just
|
|
that. For example, this includes the `cephfs/admin` package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Library Structure
|
|
|
|
Currently, there are three top level sub-packages that reflect three main
|
|
functional areas in Ceph. The `rados` package exposes features related to
|
|
Ceph's RADOS system and the `librados` C library. The `rbd` package exposes
|
|
features related to the RBD subsystem and the `librbd` C library. The `cephfs`
|
|
package exposes features related to CephFS and the `libcephfs` C library.
|
|
|
|
In addition the `internal` directory contains packages that have APIs used
|
|
to support the public APIs in rados, rbd, and cephfs but are not exported
|
|
publicly themselves. A large proportion of these helper libraries are intended
|
|
to ease working with C functions from Go. These are placed under the special
|
|
"internal" namespace so that we do not promise outside consumers that these
|
|
APIs are part of go-ceph or stable.
|
|
|
|
Under `cephfs/admin` there is a sub-package aimed at managing aspects of CephFS
|
|
such as administering subvolumes, subvolume groups, snapshots, and other facets
|
|
of CephFS that can be also be managed using the `ceph` command line tool but are
|
|
not directly part of the C API.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## File Structure
|
|
|
|
When writing new code or updating go-ceph, keep in mind that a single .go file
|
|
should be related to a single related "sub-topic" within the scope of the
|
|
subsystem. For example, functions related to snapshotting an rbd volume are
|
|
in `snapshot.go`. Following Go convention, tests for those functions will be
|
|
found in `snashot_test.go`. For historical reasons, there are still a few
|
|
"omnibus" .go files in the codebase. Please avoid adding to those files whenever
|
|
possible.
|
|
|
|
The go-ceph project uses "build tags" to support multiple versions of Ceph with
|
|
a single version of go-ceph. [Build
|
|
tags](https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/customizing-go-binaries-with-build-tags)
|
|
are a feature of Go that we use to conditionally build some files based on Ceph
|
|
release versions. Typically, we use the release code name of Ceph (nautilus,
|
|
octopus, etc) to choose what APIs in Ceph we expect to be available. Because
|
|
some APIs for a topical area may vary across ceph releases we some time name
|
|
files like `snapshot_nautilus.go` to support compiling some APIs only
|
|
conditionally for given versions of Ceph. Depending on the feature, an API
|
|
function in go-ceph may be disabled entirely or if the APIs in Ceph are largely
|
|
compatible one go-ceph function may be written in terms of different C APIs
|
|
functions (that produce the same effect).
|
|
|
|
|
|
## API Naming
|
|
|
|
Generally, the go-ceph project aims to name functions and types similarly to
|
|
the names used in Ceph libraries and documentation. We also follow the standard
|
|
Go naming conventions. This leads us to converting some names from
|
|
`underscore_style` to `CamelCase` style. However, we try to retain the same
|
|
terms used by the Ceph functions. Occasionally, we will tweak the word order
|
|
to fit the object-method approach. For example, if a function in Ceph is called
|
|
`pantry_cheese_get` and we've created a type `Pantry` to encapsulate functions
|
|
related to the pantry topic, we might add a function `func (p *Pantry)
|
|
GetCheese(...)` rather than keeping the word order of the original. When in
|
|
doubt, do what seems reasonable and ask for additional feedback during code
|
|
review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Documentation Conventions
|
|
|
|
The project intends to rigorously document the public facing APIs of go-ceph.
|
|
This starts by adding godoc comments to exported functions and types. This
|
|
is currently enforced by tools in our CI. Additionally, we've established a
|
|
"home grown" convention to help map between Ceph APIs and go-ceph ones.
|
|
For functions that have an equivalent C API, add a block at the bottom of
|
|
the doc comment that starts with "Implements:" and is followed by
|
|
the C function definition, indented, like so:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
// GroupImageAdd will add the specified image to the named group.
|
|
// An io context must be supplied for both the group and image.
|
|
//
|
|
// Implements:
|
|
// int rbd_group_image_add(rados_ioctx_t group_p,
|
|
// const char *group_name,
|
|
// rados_ioctx_t image_p,
|
|
// const char *image_name);
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The typical Go-style doc comment goes first, followed by the "Implements" line,
|
|
indicating that what follows is what C function being implemented by the
|
|
go-ceph function, and then the C function. This is indented so that the
|
|
godoc system treats it as a quoted block.
|
|
|
|
These lines help readers who are familiar with the C API and may even aid
|
|
search engines. In addition, we have some simplistic tooling that uses these
|
|
comments to help us determine how much of the Ceph APIs we're covering.
|
|
|
|
For the `cephfs/admin` package, and any similar cases where there's CLI support
|
|
for something but no Ceph API, we replace "Implements" by "Similar To" and
|
|
record a simplified version of the command it most closely matches. Example:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
// ListSubVolumes returns a list of subvolumes belonging to the volume and
|
|
// optional subvolume group.
|
|
//
|
|
// Similar To:
|
|
// ceph fs subvolume ls <volume> --group-name=<group>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Recently, go-ceph has adopted an [API Stability Policy](./api-stability.md) to
|
|
help users of our library know what APIs are deprecated and what APIs are
|
|
available for preview. In short, APIs that are deprecated must contain a line
|
|
starting with "Deprecated:" and APIs that are preview must contain a line
|
|
starting with " PREVIEW".
|
|
|
|
Deprecated function Example:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
// AllocateBlocks pre-allocates the specified number of memory blocks
|
|
// for caching.
|
|
//
|
|
// Deprecated: this API is no longer supported.
|
|
//
|
|
// Implements.
|
|
// int allocate_blocks(...)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Preview function example:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
// Energize the particle buffers with anti-nutrinos. This can be used to
|
|
// warm up the Heisenberg compensator.
|
|
// PREVIEW
|
|
//
|
|
// Implements:
|
|
// int energize(...)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### API Status
|
|
|
|
In order to better track the status of our deprecated and preview APIs we have
|
|
an [API Status document](./api-status.md). This document is generated from a
|
|
JSON file in our `docs/` directory. When a new API is being added, one or more
|
|
additional patches need to be provided to update the API status doc and JSON
|
|
file. If you have no unusual requirements, you can run `make api-update` and
|
|
commit the changes that have been made to the `docs/` directory.
|
|
|
|
This command will automatically update the `api-status.*` files, indicating
|
|
that the API is added in the next expected release and will become stable
|
|
two release after that. If you need to, you can customize this behavior
|
|
by editing the JSON file by hand, or running `./contib/apiage.py` with
|
|
different options, followed by running `make api-doc` to update the generated
|
|
markdown file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Testing
|
|
|
|
The go-ceph project makes heavy use of unit and functional tests to ensure it
|
|
matches the behaviors of Ceph as intended. We are not strict about the
|
|
distinction between the types of tests and generally treat the majority of
|
|
tests as functional. Unless you're running a manually specified subset of
|
|
tests we require a running Ceph cluster to ensure the APIs we've implemented
|
|
are correct in terms of the Ceph features we need.
|
|
|
|
As of this writing the test automation is preformed using the github actions
|
|
system. The YAML files under `.github/workflows` define the jobs that get
|
|
executed automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Running Tests
|
|
|
|
For both running tests locally or in our CI jobs we build and run the tests in
|
|
(OCI/docker) containers. This also includes containers to run a self-contained
|
|
"micro" Ceph cluster. The container images can be build by running `make
|
|
ci-image` an optional `CEPH_VERSION` variable can be provided which will be
|
|
used to select the base image for the container. Currently it can be supplied
|
|
as either "nautilus" or "octopus".
|
|
|
|
The entire suite of tests can be run via the makefile rule `test-container`.
|
|
For example: `make test-container`. The behavior of the test container is
|
|
controlled by the script `entrypoint.sh`. This script takes a number of command
|
|
line options, and can be used to restrict what tests will be run. For example,
|
|
the command line option `--test-pkg=rados`. Will only test the `rados`
|
|
subpackage. The `--help` option can be provided to view the options the script
|
|
supports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Adding New Tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
We stress the importance of all new features and code changes having
|
|
corresponding tests. We try not to obsess over having 100% line coverage, but
|
|
do want to see everything that can be tested have a test case. By default, our
|
|
test container enables coverage reports so it is fairly easy to see what parts
|
|
of the library have coverage or not. The CI also captures the generated
|
|
coverage HTML reports and makes them available to download.
|
|
|
|
The go-ceph project makes use of the [testify
|
|
library](https://github.com/stretchr/testify). Depending on the circumstances,
|
|
tests use a mix of checks (assert) and requirements (require). If a test
|
|
function must not proceed past a certain point, use require. Otherwise, we
|
|
default to assert calls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Misc
|
|
|
|
Code quality and formatting checks can be run via `make check`. These checks
|
|
require `gofmt` as well as [revive](https://github.com/mgechev/revive).
|
|
|
|
A custom tool called `implements` is available under `contrib/implements`. This
|
|
tool is designed to help compare what is available in ceph vs. go-ceph. It
|
|
checks both the "Implements" sections in the comments as well as the code
|
|
itself. It requires the [castxml](https://github.com/CastXML/CastXML) CLI tool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Contribution Guidelines
|
|
|
|
The go-ceph project makes use of the pull-request workflow provided by github.
|
|
Work should be submitted as a series of patches organized on a git branch and
|
|
then submitted together as a PR. As a general rule, small PRs - both in terms
|
|
of number of patches and lines of code - are processed, reviewed and merged
|
|
faster than larger ones. However, if you have to err on one side or the other,
|
|
a larger number of small patches is preferable to a small number of large
|
|
patches.
|
|
|
|
Each patch should have a well formed commit message. The go-ceph project
|
|
prefers the topic-subject-body style, followed by a Signed-off-by line. Example:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[topic]: [short description]
|
|
|
|
[Longer description - multiple lines or paragraphs as needed]
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: [Your Name] <[your email]>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The commit message should help others understand the where, what, and why of
|
|
the patch. A topic is a functional area within the go-ceph project. For
|
|
example, `rados` or `cephfs`. When in doubt, let the directory name of files
|
|
changed help be your guide. So if you worked on files in the "cephfs/admin"
|
|
directory, a topic of "cephfs admin" would be appropriate.
|
|
|
|
Every new patch should be complete enough that it does not rely on any code
|
|
changes that follow it. In other words, add API A before B if B relies on A.
|
|
Add tests for a feature either in the patch that adds the feature or following
|
|
it. No (submitted) patch should cause a test failure. Keeping patches clean
|
|
this way enables the use of tools like `git bisect` to find real issues in the
|
|
future.
|
|
|
|
As noted previously, changes should be accompanied by documentation and tests
|
|
appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Closing Remarks
|
|
|
|
When in doubt, feel free to reach out to the project via the github discussions
|
|
feature, IRC chat, etc. This document is part of the go-ceph project and so
|
|
feedback and contributions to this doc are very welcome.
|