suckless
/
sbase
mirror of git://git.suckless.org/sbase
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
945 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags 3.2 MiB
Commit Graph

19 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
FRIGN ec8246bbc6 Un-boolify sbase 
It actually makes the binaries smaller, the code easier to read
(gems like "val == true", "val == false" are gone) and actually
predictable in the sense of that we actually know what we're
working with (one bitwise operator was quite adventurous and
should now be fixed).

This is also more consistent with the other suckless projects
around which don't use boolean types.
 2014-11-14 10:54:20 +00:00
FRIGN 7d2683ddf2 Sort includes and more cleanup and fixes in util/ 2014-11-14 10:54:10 +00:00
FRIGN eee98ed3a4 Fix coding style 
It was about damn time. Consistency is very important in such a
big codebase.
 2014-11-13 18:08:43 +00:00
Evan Gates 0cc3beb739 Introduce new test(1) implementation 2014-10-17 15:47:55 +01:00
sin 8311023781 Fix test(1) semantics 
Evan Gates says:

After writing my own test[0] I checked and sbase already has test. I'm
including a patch to remove test from the TODO. I also noticed that
sbase's test handles a few specific cases incorrectly (documentation
at [1]).

test ! = foo
When there are 3 arguments and the second is a valid binary primary
test should perform that binary test. Only if the second argument is
not a valid binary primary and the first is ! should test negate the
two argument test. I've attached a patch that should fix this.

test ! ! !
test ! ! ! !
When there are 3 arguments and the second is not a valid primary and
the first is !, test should return the negation of the remaining two
argument test. In this case sbase's test works correctly for ! and ! !
but fails afterwards as it's not recursive. I don't yet have a patch
for this but I'm working on one.

Then again both of these areas may be places in which worse is better.
[0] 11329f3834/test.c?at=master
[1] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/test.html
 2014-10-16 10:13:05 +01:00
sin 0c5b7b9155 Stop using EXIT_{SUCCESS,FAILURE} 2014-10-02 23:46:59 +01:00
Hiltjo Posthuma 953ebf3573 code style 
Signed-off-by: Hiltjo Posthuma <hiltjo@codemadness.org>
 2014-06-01 18:02:30 +01:00
dwts 459161481a use always static for usage and keep usage definition above main 2014-04-22 14:49:23 +01:00
sin 18fbd4606c Return false in case we invoke `test s1' and s1 is the null string 2013-11-11 12:00:22 +00:00
sin c23616555b Add support for -k (checking sticky bit) to test(1) 2013-11-11 11:56:32 +00:00
sin 11c078d116 Fix styling issue in test(1) 2013-11-11 11:54:04 +00:00
sin af1fb0c9c2 Inverse condition to avoid nesting in test(1) 2013-11-11 11:48:54 +00:00
sin 8617b29355 Implement the basic binary operations for test(1) 2013-10-15 15:38:32 +01:00
Connor Lane Smith 7c121e189e test: eprintf in usage 2012-05-15 13:34:32 +01:00
Connor Lane Smith fcb8821246 revert to per-cmd usage() 2012-05-15 13:32:56 +01:00
Connor Lane Smith 146cca114e new ARGBEGIN & usage() function 2012-05-14 21:28:41 +01:00
Connor Lane Smith f1259218f2 test: more efficient -e flag 2012-05-14 13:33:07 +01:00
Kurt H Maier ff96728bdd test: fix compiler warning 2012-04-06 23:37:36 -04:00
Connor Lane Smith cb291cc394 add test.c (thanks Random832) 2011-11-08 19:35:38 +01:00