Since 8e01472078763ebc1eaea089a1adab75dd982ccd, it's possible to use
genfscon for sysfs.
This patch should help to deprecate distribution specific call to
restorecon or tmpfiles to restore /sys/devices/system/cpu/online during
boot.
Thanks to Dominick for the tip.
Some policy modules define file contexts in /bin, /sbin and /lib without
defining similar file contexts in the same directory under /usr.
Add these missing file contexts when there are outside ifdef blocks.
This patch adds missing permissions in the kernel module that prevent
to run it without the unconfined module.
This second version improves the comment section of new interfaces:
"Domain" is replaced by "Domain allowed access".
Signed-off-by: Guido Trentalancia <guido@trentalancia.net>
Interface fs_register_binary_executable_type allow registering
interpreters using a filesystem monted on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc. In
order to access this filesystem, the process needs to search every
parent directory of the mountpoint.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org>
Remove file context aliases and update file context paths to use the /run filesystem path.
Add backward compatibility file context alias for /var/run using applications like https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783321
Lock files are still seated at /var/lock
The kernel_read_unix_sysctls() and kernel_rw_unix_sysctls() currenly
don't allow listing the /proc/sys/net/unix directory, contrary to the
other sysctl interfaces.
When reading or managing noxattr fs files or symbolic links, also
let the user list noxattr fs directories.
This patch should be applied after the following one:
http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/2016-October/008539.html
"Let users read/manage symlinks on fs that do not support xattr"
posted on Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:39:46 UTC.
Signed-off-by: Guido Trentalancia <guido@trentalancia.net>
Let unprivileged and administrative users read symbolic links on
filesystems that do not support extended attributes (xattr) such
as cdroms, FAT, NTFS and so on.
Signed-off-by: Guido Trentalancia <guido@trentalancia.net>
On Tuesday, 2 August 2016 7:59:28 PM AEDT Chris PeBenito wrote:
> On 07/31/16 08:34, Russell Coker wrote:
> > The following patch deals with a single binary for modutils, so depmod_t,
> > and insmod_t are merged.
>
> Since the main SELinux distros (including RHEL/CentOS 7) all have merged
> modutils these days, I'm open to taking a patch that fully merges these
> domains (in which case renaming to kmod_t, with proper aliasing seems
> the best idea).
>
> However, it's been some time since I used a busybox-based system; does
> busybox still have separated tools? Yes, this is a bit of an obvious
> question since busybox is also single-binary, but IIRC, the embedded
> guys made some tiny helper scripts or executables so proper
> transitioning could occur. Separate domains may still make sense.
As we have had no response from Busybox users in the last 3 months and also no
response to the thread Luis started in 2013 I think it's safe to assume that
they don't need this.
I've attached a new patch which renames to kmod_t as you suggested. Please
consider it for inclusion.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
Description: Change modutils policy to match the use of a single binary
Author: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
Last-Update: 2014-06-25
The "module_load" permission has been recently added to the "system"
class (kernel 4.7).
The following patch updates the Reference Policy so that the new
permission is allowed when a kernel module should be loaded.
To preserve the module encapsulation, a new interface is defined
in the kernel files module and that interface is then used in the
kernel module.
A short note is added about unneeded permissions that set the
kernel scheduling parameters (might lead to service disruption).
Signed-off-by: Guido Trentalancia <guido@trentalancia.net>
/etc/sysconfig/libvirtd does not have the executable bit set, so it does
not make sense for it to be labelled bin_t. I can't seem to find the
reason it was set that way originally.
Signed-off-by: Garrett Holmstrom <gholms@devzero.com>
With the new "cgroup2" system added in kernel 4.5, systemd is getting
selinux denials when manipulating the cgroup hierarchy.
Pull request in systemd with cgroup2 support:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/2903
AVC when writing process numbers to move them to the right cgroup:
Mar 29 19:58:30 rawhide kernel: audit: type=1400
audit(1459295910.257:68): avc: denied { write } for pid=1
comm="systemd" name="cgroup.procs" dev="cgroup2" ino=6
scontext=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=1
In this case new filesystem "cgroup2" need to be labeled as cgroup_t.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Vrabec <lvrabec@redhat.com>
