As reported by Nicolas Iooss, there are still some inconsistencies
in the definitions and usage of Makefile variables related to bin
and sbin directories. Since we need to still support non-usrmerge
systems, we cannot completely synchronize them, but we can eliminate
unnecessary differences, remove unused variables, and drop the
USRSBINDIR variables.
Before:
$ find . -name Makefile -exec cat {} + |grep '^[A-Z_]*BINDIR' |sort -u
BINDIR=$(PREFIX)/bin
BINDIR ?= $(PREFIX)/bin
BINDIR ?= $(PREFIX)/sbin
SBINDIR ?= $(DESTDIR)/sbin
SBINDIR ?= $(PREFIX)/sbin
USRSBINDIR ?= $(PREFIX)/sbin
After:
$ find . -name Makefile -exec cat {} + | grep '^[A-Z_]*BINDIR' | sort -u
BINDIR ?= $(PREFIX)/bin
SBINDIR ?= $(DESTDIR)/sbin
SBINDIR ?= $(PREFIX)/sbin
This does not change the actual install location of any file.
It does drop the legacy symlink from /usr/sbin/load_policy to
/sbin/load_policy; packagers can create that separately if
desired.
Reported-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Presently we support xperms rules in source policy and in CIL modules.
The binary policy module format however was never extended for xperms.
This limitation inhibits use of xperms in refpolicy-based policy modules
(including the selinux-testsuite policy). Update libsepol to support
linking, reading, and writing a new binary policy module version that
supports xperms rules. Update dismod to display xperms rules in binary
policy modules.
Also, to support use of a non-base binary policy module with a newer
version on a system using a base policy module with an older version,
automatically upgrade the version during module linking. This facilitates
usage of newer features in non-base modules without requiring rebuilding
the base module.
Tests:
1. Add an allowxperms rule to the selinux-testsuite policy and
confirm that it is properly written to the binary policy module
(displayed by dismod), converted to CIL (the latter was already supported),
and included in the kernel policy (via dispol and kernel test).
2. Use semodule_link and semodule_expand to manually link and expand
all of the .pp files via libsepol, and confirm that the allowxperms rule
is correctly propagated to the kernel policy. This test is required to
exercise the legacy link/expand code path for binary modules that predated
CIL.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
The toolchain automatically handles them and they break cross compiling.
LDFLAGS should also come before object files, some flags (eg,
-Wl,as-needed) can break things if they are in the wrong place)
Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/500674
Signed-off-by: Jason Zaman <jason@perfinion.com>
After libsepol is modified (for example while developing new features or
fixing bugs), running "make install" in the top-level directory does not
update the programs which use libsepol.a. Add this static library to the
target dependencies in order to force their updates. This makes "make"
use libsepol.a in the linking command without using LDLIBS.
While at it, copy what commit 14d7064348 ("libselinux: Allow
overriding libsepol.a location during build") introduced in libselinux
Makefile by using a new LIBSEPOLA variable in all Makefiles.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org>
When building checkpolicy/test, the linker reports the following error:
cc dispol.o -lfl /usr/src/selinux/DESTDIR/usr/lib/libsepol.a
-L/usr/src/selinux/DESTDIR/usr/lib -o dispol
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.2.1/../../../../lib/libfl.so:
undefined reference to `yylex'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
According to flex documentation
(https://github.com/westes/flex/blob/master/doc/flex.texi), -lfl is used
to provide an implementation for yywrap(). However every flex file now
uses "%option noyywrap", which makes -lfl no longer mandatory. Remove
this option from checkpolicy Makefiles.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org>
range transition and name-based type transition rules were originally
simple unordered lists. They were converted to hashtabs in the kernel
by commit 2f3e82d694d3d7a2db019db1bb63385fbc1066f3 ("selinux: convert range
transition list to a hashtab") and by commit
2463c26d50adc282d19317013ba0ff473823ca47 ("SELinux: put name based
create rules in a hashtable"), but left unchanged in libsepol and
checkpolicy. Convert libsepol and checkpolicy to use the same hashtabs
as the kernel for the range transitions and name-based type transitions.
With this change and the preceding one, it is possible to directly compare
a policy file generated by libsepol/checkpolicy and the kernel-generated
/sys/fs/selinux/policy pseudo file after normalizing them both through
checkpolicy. To do so, you can run the following sequence of commands:
checkpolicy -M -b /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.30 -o policy.1
checkpolicy -M -b /sys/fs/selinux/policy -o policy.2
cmp policy.1 policy.2
Normalizing the two files via checkpolicy is still necessary to ensure
consistent ordering of the avtab entries. There may still be potential
for other areas of difference, e.g. xperms entries may lack a well-defined
order.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Neverallow rules for ioctl extended permissions will pass in two
cases:
1. If extended permissions exist for the source-target-class set
the test will pass if the neverallow values are excluded.
2. If extended permissions do not exist for the source-target-class
set the test will pass if the ioctl permission is not granted.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>
Acked-by: Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
The ioctl operations code is being renamed to the more generic
"extended permissions." This commit brings the policy compiler
up to date with the kernel patch.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>
Also drop expanding of rules; just display the rules in their
original form. I think expansion was a relic of an older policy
version where we did not preserve attributes in the kernel policy.
In any event, it seems more useful to display the rules unmodified.
Change-Id: I85095a35cfb48138cd9cf01cde6dd0330e342c61
Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
In C, defining a function with () means "any number of parameters", not
"no parameter". Use (void) instead where applicable and add unused
parameters when needed.
Acked-by: Steve Lawrence <slawrence@tresys.com>
Include the same error type options we build everything else with.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Either by dropping the parameter or marking it as unused depending on
what works. We can't redefine hashtab_map callbacks as they must take all
three options, so just mark those unused.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
A number of places we used unsigned variables and compared them against
signed variables. This patch makes everything unsigned.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Checkpolicy was using the static link to libsepol, but also defining a
dynamic link (that wasn't needed). This confuses gdb. Drop the dynamic
link request.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
The output formatting had two items crammed together without a space.
Add a space.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
update .gitignore to include files that are normally created when
working and building inside the git repo
Sigend-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
There was no way to print all of the role transition rules in dispol.
Add that support.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
The formatting of dismod/dispol display of filename trans rules didn't
make a lot of sense. Make them more like the original rules.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
This patch adds support for using the last path component as part of the
information in making labeling decisions for new objects. A example
rule looks like so:
type_transition unconfined_t etc_t:file system_conf_t eric;
This rule says if unconfined_t creates a file in a directory labeled
etc_t and the last path component is "eric" (no globbing, no matching
magic, just exact strcmp) it should be labeled system_conf_t.
The kernel and policy representation does not have support for such
rules in conditionals, and thus policy explicitly notes that fact if
such a rule is added to a conditional.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Lawrence <slawrence@tresys.com>
We just use random numbers to make menu selections. Use #defines and
names that make some sense instead.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Lawrence <slawrence@tresys.com>
Add support to display the class field in the role_transition rule
in the checkpolicy/test/dismod program.
Signed-off-by: Harry Ciao <qingtao.cao@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Lawrence <slawrence@tresys.com>
Email: justinmattock@gmail.com
Subject: checkpolicy Fix error: variable 'newattr' set but not used(and others as well)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 15:23:28 -0700
The below patch fixes some warning messages Im receiving
with GCC:(in this case some are erros due to -Werror)
policy_define.c: In function 'define_type':
policy_define.c:1216:6: error: variable 'newattr' set but not used
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chad Sellers <csellers@tresys.com>
