libsemanage/direct_api: INTEGER_OVERFLOW read_len = read()

The following statement is always true if read_len is unsigned:
(read_len = read(fd, data_read + data_read_len, max_len - data_read_len)) > 0

Fixes:
 Error: INTEGER_OVERFLOW (CWE-190): [#def19] [important]
 libsemanage-3.7/src/direct_api.c:598:2: tainted_data_return: Called function "read(fd, data_read + data_read_len, max_len - data_read_len)", and a possible return value may be less than zero.
 libsemanage-3.7/src/direct_api.c:598:2: cast_underflow: An assign of a possibly negative number to an unsigned type, which might trigger an underflow.
 libsemanage-3.7/src/direct_api.c:599:3: overflow: The expression "data_read_len += read_len" is deemed underflowed because at least one of its arguments has underflowed.
 libsemanage-3.7/src/direct_api.c:598:2: overflow: The expression "max_len - data_read_len" is deemed underflowed because at least one of its arguments has underflowed.
 libsemanage-3.7/src/direct_api.c:598:2: overflow_sink: "max_len - data_read_len", which might have underflowed, is passed to "read(fd, data_read + data_read_len, max_len - data_read_len)". [Note: The source code implementation of the function has been overridden by a builtin model.]
 \#  596|   	}
 \#  597|
 \#  598|-> 	while ((read_len = read(fd, data_read + data_read_len, max_len - data_read_len)) > 0) {
 \#  599|   		data_read_len += read_len;
 \#  600|   		if (data_read_len == max_len) {

Signed-off-by: Vit Mojzis <vmojzis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>

libsemanage/src/direct_api.c

@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ cleanup:
 static int read_from_pipe_to_data(semanage_handle_t *sh, size_t initial_len, int fd, char **out_data_read, size_t *out_read_len)
 {
 	size_t max_len = initial_len;
-	size_t read_len = 0;
+	ssize_t read_len = 0;
 	size_t data_read_len = 0;
 	char *data_read = NULL;