Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Maxim Ivanov bdc53098fc Avoid having contended mutexes on same cacheline
CPUs have to serialise write access to a single cache line
effectively reducing level of possible parallelism. Placing
mutexes on different cache lines avoids this problem.

Most gains will be seen on NUMA servers where CPU interconnect
traffic is especially expensive

Before:
go test . -run none -bench BenchmarkFingerprintLocker
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerParallel-4   	 2000000	       932 ns/op
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerSerial-4     	30000000	        49.6 ns/op

After:
go test . -run none -bench BenchmarkFingerprintLocker
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerParallel-4   	 3000000	       569 ns/op
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerSerial-4     	30000000	        51.0 ns/op
2016-09-18 23:32:55 +01:00
beorn7 b274c7aaa7 Update doc comments 2016-06-03 12:34:01 +02:00
beorn7 99881ded63 Make the number of fingerprint mutexes configurable
With a lot of series accessed in a short timeframe (by a query, a
large scrape, checkpointing, ...), there is actually quite a
significant amount of lock contention if something similar is running
at the same time.

In those cases, the number of locks needs to be increased.

On the same front, as our fingerprints don't have a lot of entropy, I
introduced some additional shuffling. With the current state, anly
changes in the least singificant bits of a FP would matter.
2016-06-02 19:18:00 +02:00
Jonathan Boulle 38098f8c95 Add missing license headers
Prometheus is Apache 2 licensed, and most source files have the
appropriate copyright license header, but some were missing it without
apparent reason. Correct that by adding it.
2016-04-13 16:08:22 +02:00
Fabian Reinartz 306e8468a0 Switch from client_golang/model to common/model 2015-08-21 13:33:38 +02:00
Julius Volz 7f5d3c2c29 Fix and improve the fp locker.
Benchmark:
$ go test -bench 'Fingerprint' -test.run 'Fingerprint' -test.cpu=1,2,4

OLD
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerParallel        500000              3618 ns/op
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerParallel-2      100000             12257 ns/op
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerParallel-4      500000             10164 ns/op
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerSerial        10000000               283 ns/op
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerSerial-2      10000000               284 ns/op
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerSerial-4      10000000               288 ns/op

NEW
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerParallel       1000000              1018 ns/op
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerParallel-2     1000000              1164 ns/op
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerParallel-4     2000000               910 ns/op
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerSerial        50000000                56.0 ns/op
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerSerial-2      50000000                47.9 ns/op
BenchmarkFingerprintLockerSerial-4      50000000                54.5 ns/op

Change-Id: I3c65a43822840e7e64c3c3cfe759e1de51272581
2014-11-25 17:07:45 +01:00
Bjoern Rabenstein 7e6a03fbf9 Fix a few concurrency issues before starting to use the new fp locker.
Change-Id: I8615e8816e79ef0882e123163ee590c739b79d12
2014-11-25 17:07:45 +01:00
Julius Volz e0ee7ec7ab Add fingerprintLocker for locking individual fingerprints.
Change-Id: Id41ba555715229edf7d6543f56736b82f6eff1ef
2014-11-25 17:07:45 +01:00