* Add basic initial developer docs for TSDB
There's a decent amount of content already out there (blog posts,
conference talks, etc), but:
* when they get stale, they don't tend to get updated
* they still leave me with questions that I'ld like to answer
for developers (like me) who want to use, or work with, TSDB
What I propose is developer docs inside the prometheus
repository. Easy to find and harness the power of the community
to expand it and keep it up to date.
* perfect is the enemy of good. Let's have a base and incrementally improve
* Markdown docs should be broad but not too deep. Source code comments
can complement them, and are the ideal place for implementation details.
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* use example code that works out of the box
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* PR feedback
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* more docs
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* PR feedback
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* feedback
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* Update tsdb/docs/usage.md
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* final tweaks
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* workaround docs versioning issue
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* Move example code to real executable, testable example.
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* cleanup example test and make sure it always reproduces
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* obtain temp dir in a way that works with older Go versions
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* Fix Ganesh's comments
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* TSDB: demistify seriesRefs and ChunkRefs
The TSDB package contains many types of series and chunk references,
all shrouded in uint types. Often the same uint value may
actually mean one of different types, in non-obvious ways.
This PR aims to clarify the code and help navigating to relevant docs,
usage, etc much quicker.
Concretely:
* Use appropriately named types and document their semantics and
relations.
* Make multiplexing and demuxing of types explicit
(on the boundaries between concrete implementations and generic
interfaces).
* Casting between different types should be free. None of the changes
should have any impact on how the code runs.
TODO: Implement BlockSeriesRef where appropriate (for a future PR)
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* feedback
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* agent: demistify seriesRefs and ChunkRefs
Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
* Write exemplars to the WAL and send them over remote write.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Update example for exemplars, print data in a more obvious format.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Add metrics for remote write of exemplars.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Fix incorrect slices passed to send in remote write.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* We need to unregister the new metrics.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Address review comments
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Order of exemplar append vs write exemplar to WAL needs to change.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Several fixes to prevent sending uninitialized or incorrect samples with an exemplar. Fix dropping exemplar for missing series. Add tests for queue_manager sending exemplars
Signed-off-by: Martin Disibio <mdisibio@gmail.com>
* Store both samples and exemplars in the same timeseries buffer to remove the alloc when building final request, keep sub-slices in separate buffers for re-use
Signed-off-by: Martin Disibio <mdisibio@gmail.com>
* Condense sample/exemplar delivery tests to parameterized sub-tests
Signed-off-by: Martin Disibio <mdisibio@gmail.com>
* Rename test methods for clarity now that they also handle exemplars
Signed-off-by: Martin Disibio <mdisibio@gmail.com>
* Rename counter variable. Fix instances where metrics were not updated correctly
Signed-off-by: Martin Disibio <mdisibio@gmail.com>
* Add exemplars to LoadWAL benchmark
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* last exemplars timestamp metric needs to convert value to seconds with
ms precision
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Process exemplar records in a separate go routine when loading the WAL.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Address review comments related to clarifying comments and variable
names. Also refactor sample/exemplar to enqueue prompb types.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Regenerate types proto with comments, update protoc version again.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Put remote write of exemplars behind a feature flag.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Address some of Ganesh's review comments.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Move exemplar remote write feature flag to a config file field.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Address Bartek's review comments.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Don't allocate exemplar buffers in queue_manager if we're not going to
send exemplars over remote write.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Add ValidateExemplar function, validate exemplars when appending to head
and log them all to WAL before adding them to exemplar storage.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Address more reivew comments from Ganesh.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Add exemplar total label length check.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Address a few last review comments
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Disibio <mdisibio@gmail.com>
When appending to the head and a chunk is full it is flushed to the disk and m-mapped (memory mapped) to free up memory
Prom startup now happens in these stages
- Iterate the m-maped chunks from disk and keep a map of series reference to its slice of mmapped chunks.
- Iterate the WAL as usual. Whenever we create a new series, look for it's mmapped chunks in the map created before and add it to that series.
If a head chunk is corrupted the currpted one and all chunks after that are deleted and the data after the corruption is recovered from the existing WAL which means that a corruption in m-mapped files results in NO data loss.
[Mmaped chunks format](https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/blob/master/tsdb/docs/format/head_chunks.md) - main difference is that the chunk for mmaping now also includes series reference because there is no index for mapping series to chunks.
[The block chunks](https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/blob/master/tsdb/docs/format/chunks.md) are accessed from the index which includes the offsets for the chunks in the chunks file - example - chunks of series ID have offsets 200, 500 etc in the chunk files.
In case of mmaped chunks, the offsets are stored in memory and accessed from that. During WAL replay, these offsets are restored by iterating all m-mapped chunks as stated above by matching the series id present in the chunk header and offset of that chunk in that file.
**Prombench results**
_WAL Replay_
1h Wal reply time
30% less wal reply time - 4m31 vs 3m36
2h Wal reply time
20% less wal reply time - 8m16 vs 7m
_Memory During WAL Replay_
High Churn:
10-15% less RAM - 32gb vs 28gb
20% less RAM after compaction 34gb vs 27gb
No Churn:
20-30% less RAM - 23gb vs 18gb
40% less RAM after compaction 32.5gb vs 20gb
Screenshots are in [this comment](https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pull/6679#issuecomment-621678932)
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <cs15btech11018@iith.ac.in>
Rather than buffer up symbols in RAM, do it one by one
during compaction. Then use the reader's symbol handling
for symbol lookups during the rest of the index write.
There is some slowdown in compaction, due to having to look through a file
rather than a hash lookup. This is noise to the overall cost of compacting
series with thousands of samples though.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4 539917175 675341565 +25.08%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4 2441815993 2477453524 +1.46%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4 3978543559 3922909687 -1.40%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4 8430219716 8586610007 +1.86%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4 1786424591 1909552782 +6.89%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4 5328998202 6020839950 +12.98%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4 10085059958 11085278690 +9.92%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4 25497010155 27018079806 +5.97%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4 2427391406 2817217987 +16.06%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4 2592965497 2538805050 -2.09%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4 2437388343 2668012858 +9.46%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4 2317095324 2787423966 +20.30%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4 2600239857 2096973860 -19.35%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4 500851 470794 -6.00%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4 821527 791451 -3.66%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4 1141562 1111508 -2.63%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4 2141576 2111504 -1.40%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4 871466 841424 -3.45%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4 1941428 1911415 -1.55%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4 3071573 3041510 -0.98%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4 6771648 6741509 -0.45%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4 731493 824888 +12.77%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4 793918 887311 +11.76%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4 811842 905204 +11.50%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4 832244 925081 +11.16%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4 921553 1019162 +10.59%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4 40532648 35698276 -11.93%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4 60340216 53409568 -11.49%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4 81087336 72065552 -11.13%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4 142485576 120878544 -15.16%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4 208661368 203831136 -2.31%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4 347345904 340484696 -1.98%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4 585185856 576244648 -1.53%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4 1357641792 1358966528 +0.10%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4 126486664 119666744 -5.39%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4 122323192 115117224 -5.89%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4 126404504 119469864 -5.49%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4 119047832 112230408 -5.73%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4 136576016 116634800 -14.60%
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
Rather than keeping the offset of each postings list, instead
keep the nth offset of the offset of the posting list. As postings
list offsets have always been sorted, we can then get to the closest
entry before the one we want an iterate forwards.
I haven't done much tuning on the 32 number, it was chosen to try
not to read through more than a 4k page of data.
Switch to a bulk interface for fetching postings. Use it to avoid having
to re-read parts of the posting offset table when querying lots of it.
For a index with what BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers uses RAM
for r.postings drops from 3.79MB to 80.19kB or about 48x.
Bytes allocated go down by 30%, and suprisingly CPU usage drops by
4-6% for typical queries too.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4 35231 36673 +4.09%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4 563380 540627 -4.04%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4 536782 534186 -0.48%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4 533990 541550 +1.42%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4 113374598 117969608 +4.05%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4 146329884 139651442 -4.56%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4 50346510 44961127 -10.70%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4 41261550 35356165 -14.31%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 112544418 116904010 +3.87%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 112487086 116864918 +3.89%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4 41094758 35457904 -13.72%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 41906372 36151473 -13.73%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 147262414 140424800 -4.64%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 28615629 27872072 -2.60%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 147117177 140462403 -4.52%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 175096826 167902298 -4.11%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4 4 6 +50.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4 7 11 +57.14%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4 7 11 +57.14%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4 15 17 +13.33%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4 100010 100012 +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4 200069 200040 -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4 200072 200045 -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4 200070 200041 -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 100013 100017 +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 100017 100023 +0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4 200073 200046 -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 200075 200050 -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 200074 200049 -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 111165 111150 -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 200078 200055 -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 311282 311238 -0.01%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4 264 296 +12.12%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4 360 424 +17.78%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4 360 424 +17.78%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4 520 552 +6.15%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4 1600461 1600482 +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4 24900801 17259077 -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4 24900836 17259151 -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4 24900760 17259048 -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 1600557 1600621 +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 1600717 1600813 +0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4 24900856 17259176 -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 24900952 17259304 -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 24900993 17259333 -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 3788311 3142630 -17.04%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 24901137 17259509 -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 28693086 20405680 -28.88%
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
Dieter Plaetinck
Ganesh Vernekar
Callum Styan
Simon Pasquier
Brian Brazil
yuxiaobo
zhulongcheng
Ganesh Vernekar