Clarify in the first comment that it is `watch()` that waits, and reduce
verbiage.
The second comment was slightly contradictory to the first and otherwise
didn't seem to add much, since `currentSegment` was incremented just a
few lines later.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* fix bug that would cause us to only read from the WAL on the 15s
fallback timer if remote write had fallen behind and is no longer
reading from the WAL segment that is currently being written to
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* remove unintended logging, fix lint, plus allow test to take slightly
longer because cloud CI
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* address review feedback
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* fix watcher sleeps in test, flu brain is smooth
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* increase timeout, unfortunately cloud CI can require a longer timeout
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* WIP implement WAL watcher reading via notifications over a channel from
the TSDB code
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Notify via head appenders Commit (finished all WAL logging) rather than
on each WAL Log call
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Fix misspelled Notify plus add a metric for dropped Write notifications
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Update tests to handle new notification pattern
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* this test maybe needs more time on windows?
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* does this test need more time on windows as well?
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* read timeout is already a time.Duration
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* remove mistakenly commited benchmark data files
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* address some review feedback
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* fix missed changes from previous commit
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Fix issues from wrapper function
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* try fixing race condition in test by allowing tests to overwrite the
read ticker timeout instead of calling the Notify function
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* fix linting
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
This changes usage of path to be replaced with path/filepath, allowing
for filepath.Base to properly return the base directory on systems where
`/` is not the standard path separator.
This resolves an issue on Windows where intermediate folders containing
a `.` were incorrectly considered to be a part of the checkpoint name.
Related to grafana/agent#3826.
Signed-off-by: Robert Fratto <robertfratto@gmail.com>
Wiser coders than myself have come to the conclusion that a `switch`
statement is almost always superior to a statement that includes any
`else if`.
The exceptions that I have found in our codebase are just these two:
* The `if else` is followed by an additional statement before the next
condition (separated by a `;`).
* The whole thing is within a `for` loop and `break` statements are
used. In this case, using `switch` would require tagging the `for`
loop, which probably tips the balance.
Why are `switch` statements more readable?
For one, fewer curly braces. But more importantly, the conditions all
have the same alignment, so the whole thing follows the natural flow
of going down a list of conditions. With `else if`, in contrast, all
conditions but the first are "hidden" behind `} else if `, harder to
spot and (for no good reason) presented differently from the first
condition.
I'm sure the aforemention wise coders can list even more reasons.
In any case, I like it so much that I have found myself recommending
it in code reviews. I would like to make it a habit in our code base,
without making it a hard requirement that we would test on the CI. But
for that, there has to be a role model, so this commit eliminates all
`if else` occurrences, unless it is autogenerated code or fits one of
the exceptions above.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
* adapt code.go and write_handler.go to support float histograms
* adapt watcher.go to support float histograms
* wip adapt queue_manager.go to support float histograms
* address comments for metrics in queue_manager.go
* set test cases for queue manager
* use same counts for histograms and float histograms
* refactor createHistograms tests
* fix float histograms ref in watcher_test.go
* address PR comments
Signed-off-by: Marc Tuduri <marctc@protonmail.com>
The wlog.WL type can now be used to create a Write Ahead Log or a Write
Behind Log.
Before the prefix for wbl metrics was
'prometheus_tsdb_out_of_order_wal_' and has been replaced with
'prometheus_tsdb_out_of_order_wbl_'.
Signed-off-by: Jesus Vazquez <jesus.vazquez@grafana.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesus Vazquez <jesusvazquez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
machine424
Bryan Boreham
Callum Styan
Matthieu MOREL
Julien Levesy
Robert Fratto
beorn7
Marc Tudurí
Ganesh Vernekar
Jesus Vazquez