I find it useful to know why a restriction exists, to check whether that
reason still applies, or in which other places it might apply.
This is based on the note here:
https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pull/9270#pullrequestreview-743820956
on the PR where the original comment was added.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Disable isolation in isolation struct
Signed-off-by: darshanime <deathbullet@gmail.com>
* Run tsdb tests with isolation disabled
Signed-off-by: darshanime <deathbullet@gmail.com>
* Check for isolation disabled in isoState.Close()
Signed-off-by: darshanime <deathbullet@gmail.com>
* use t.Skip to skip isolation tests when disabled
Signed-off-by: darshanime <deathbullet@gmail.com>
* address review comments
Signed-off-by: darshanime <deathbullet@gmail.com>
* fix test for defaultIsolationState
Signed-off-by: darshanime <deathbullet@gmail.com>
* Change flag name. Set flag in DB. Do not init txRing. Close isoState.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Test disabled isolation in CircleCI test_go
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Skip isolation related tests in db_test.go
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
Fetch the low watermark value under the same lock as we need for the
appender, rather than releasing then re-aquiring a lock on the same
Mutex.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Track open appenders in doubly-linked list to make lowWatermark O(1).
* Use RW locks.
* Added BenchmarkIsolationWithState.
Signed-off-by: Peter Štibraný <peter.stibrany@grafana.com>
Bryan Boreham
Darshan Chaudhary
Ganesh Vernekar
Peter Štibraný
beorn7