Use consistent keys for logs
Rule warnings are logged with numDropped=N while every other component uses num_dropped=N: ``` notifier/notifier.go: level.Warn(n.logger).Log("msg", "Alert batch larger than queue capacity, dropping alerts", "num_dropped", d) notifier/notifier.go: level.Warn(n.logger).Log("msg", "Alert notification queue full, dropping alerts", "num_dropped", d) storage/remote/write_handler.go: _ = level.Warn(h.logger).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting out-of-order exemplars", "num_dropped", outOfOrderExemplarErrs) rules/group.go: level.Warn(logger).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting out-of-order result from rule evaluation", "num_dropped", numOutOfOrder) rules/group.go: level.Warn(logger).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting too old result from rule evaluation", "num_dropped", numTooOld) rules/group.go: level.Warn(logger).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting results from rule evaluation with different value but same timestamp", "num_dropped", numDuplicates) scrape/scrape.go: level.Warn(sl.l).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting out-of-order samples", "num_dropped", appErrs.numOutOfOrder) scrape/scrape.go: level.Warn(sl.l).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting samples with different value but same timestamp", "num_dropped", appErrs.numDuplicates) scrape/scrape.go: level.Warn(sl.l).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting samples that are too old or are too far into the future", "num_dropped", appErrs.numOutOfBounds) scrape/scrape.go: level.Warn(sl.l).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting out-of-order exemplars", "num_dropped", appErrs.numExemplarOutOfOrder) ``` Rename numDropped to num_dropped for consistency. Signed-off-by: Łukasz Mierzwa <l.mierzwa@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
61481160d7
commit
3bb27c33e9
|
@ -546,13 +546,13 @@ func (g *Group) Eval(ctx context.Context, ts time.Time) {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if numOutOfOrder > 0 {
|
if numOutOfOrder > 0 {
|
||||||
level.Warn(logger).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting out-of-order result from rule evaluation", "numDropped", numOutOfOrder)
|
level.Warn(logger).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting out-of-order result from rule evaluation", "num_dropped", numOutOfOrder)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if numTooOld > 0 {
|
if numTooOld > 0 {
|
||||||
level.Warn(logger).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting too old result from rule evaluation", "numDropped", numTooOld)
|
level.Warn(logger).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting too old result from rule evaluation", "num_dropped", numTooOld)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if numDuplicates > 0 {
|
if numDuplicates > 0 {
|
||||||
level.Warn(logger).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting results from rule evaluation with different value but same timestamp", "numDropped", numDuplicates)
|
level.Warn(logger).Log("msg", "Error on ingesting results from rule evaluation with different value but same timestamp", "num_dropped", numDuplicates)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for metric, lset := range g.seriesInPreviousEval[i] {
|
for metric, lset := range g.seriesInPreviousEval[i] {
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue