`MemPostings.PostingsForLabelMatching()`: don't hold the mutex while matching (#14286)

* MemPostings.PostingsForLabelMatching: let mutex go

This changes the `MemPostings.PostingsForLabelMatching` implementation
to stop holding the read mutex while matching the label values.

We've seen that this method can be slow when the matcher is expensive,
that's why we even added a context expiration check.

However, there are critical process that might be waiting on this mutex:
writes (adding new series) and compaction (deleting the
garbage-collected ones), so we should avoid holding it for a long period
of time.

Given that we've copied the values to a slice anyway, there's no need to
hold the lock while matching.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

tsdb/index/postings.go

@@ -425,16 +425,62 @@ func (p *MemPostings) addFor(id storage.SeriesRef, l labels.Label) {
 }
 
 func (p *MemPostings) PostingsForLabelMatching(ctx context.Context, name string, match func(string) bool) Postings {
-	p.mtx.RLock()
+	// We'll copy the values into a slice and then match over that,
+	// this way we don't need to hold the mutex while we're matching,
+	// which can be slow (seconds) if the match function is a huge regex.
+	// Holding this lock prevents new series from being added (slows down the write path)
+	// and blocks the compaction process.
+	vals := p.labelValues(name)
+	for i, count := 0, 1; i < len(vals); count++ {
+		if count%checkContextEveryNIterations == 0 && ctx.Err() != nil {
+			return ErrPostings(ctx.Err())
+		}
 
-	e := p.m[name]
-	if len(e) == 0 {
-		p.mtx.RUnlock()
+		if match(vals[i]) {
+			i++
+			continue
+		}
+
+		// Didn't match, bring the last value to this position, make the slice shorter and check again.
+		// The order of the slice doesn't matter as it comes from a map iteration.
+		vals[i], vals = vals[len(vals)-1], vals[:len(vals)-1]
+	}
+
+	// If none matched (or this label had no values), no need to grab the lock again.
+	if len(vals) == 0 {
 		return EmptyPostings()
 	}
 
-	// Benchmarking shows that first copying the values into a slice and then matching over that is
-	// faster than matching over the map keys directly, at least on AMD64.
+	// Now `vals` only contains the values that matched, get their postings.
+	its := make([]Postings, 0, len(vals))
+	p.mtx.RLock()
+	e := p.m[name]
+	for _, v := range vals {
+		if refs, ok := e[v]; ok {
+			// Some of the values may have been garbage-collected in the meantime this is fine, we'll just skip them.
+			// If we didn't let the mutex go, we'd have these postings here, but they would be pointing nowhere
+			// because there would be a `MemPostings.Delete()` call waiting for the lock to delete these labels,
+			// because the series were deleted already.
+			its = append(its, NewListPostings(refs))
+		}
+	}
+	// Let the mutex go before merging.
+	p.mtx.RUnlock()
+
+	return Merge(ctx, its...)
+}
+
+// labelValues returns a slice of label values for the given label name.
+// It will take the read lock.
+func (p *MemPostings) labelValues(name string) []string {
+	p.mtx.RLock()
+	defer p.mtx.RUnlock()
+
+	e := p.m[name]
+	if len(e) == 0 {
+		return nil
+	}
+
 	vals := make([]string, 0, len(e))
 	for v, srs := range e {
 		if len(srs) > 0 {
@@ -442,21 +488,7 @@ func (p *MemPostings) PostingsForLabelMatching(ctx context.Context, name string,
 		}
 	}
 
-	var its []Postings
-	count := 1
-	for _, v := range vals {
-		if count%checkContextEveryNIterations == 0 && ctx.Err() != nil {
-			p.mtx.RUnlock()
-			return ErrPostings(ctx.Err())
-		}
-		count++
-		if match(v) {
-			its = append(its, NewListPostings(e[v]))
-		}
-	}
-	p.mtx.RUnlock()
-
-	return Merge(ctx, its...)
+	return vals
 }
 
 // ExpandPostings returns the postings expanded as a slice.

tsdb/index/postings_test.go

@@ -1435,6 +1435,28 @@ func BenchmarkMemPostings_PostingsForLabelMatching(b *testing.B) {
 	}
 }
 
+func TestMemPostings_PostingsForLabelMatching(t *testing.T) {
+	mp := NewMemPostings()
+	mp.Add(1, labels.FromStrings("foo", "1"))
+	mp.Add(2, labels.FromStrings("foo", "2"))
+	mp.Add(3, labels.FromStrings("foo", "3"))
+	mp.Add(4, labels.FromStrings("foo", "4"))
+
+	isEven := func(v string) bool {
+		iv, err := strconv.Atoi(v)
+		if err != nil {
+			panic(err)
+		}
+		return iv%2 == 0
+	}
+
+	p := mp.PostingsForLabelMatching(context.Background(), "foo", isEven)
+	require.NoError(t, p.Err())
+	refs, err := ExpandPostings(p)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	require.Equal(t, []storage.SeriesRef{2, 4}, refs)
+}
+
 func TestMemPostings_PostingsForLabelMatchingHonorsContextCancel(t *testing.T) {
 	memP := NewMemPostings()
 	seriesCount := 10 * checkContextEveryNIterations