prometheus/storage/remote/wal_watcher_test.go

448 lines
11 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
// Copyright 2018 The Prometheus Authors
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package remote
import (
"fmt"
"io/ioutil"
"math/rand"
"os"
"path"
"sync"
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/prometheus/common/model"
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pkg/timestamp"
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/prompb"
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/util/testutil"
"github.com/prometheus/tsdb"
"github.com/prometheus/tsdb/labels"
"github.com/prometheus/tsdb/wal"
)
type writeToMock struct {
samplesAppended int
seriesLabels map[uint64][]prompb.Label
seriesLock sync.Mutex
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
seriesSegmentIndexes map[uint64]int
}
func (wtm *writeToMock) Append(s []tsdb.RefSample) bool {
wtm.samplesAppended += len(s)
return true
}
func (wtm *writeToMock) StoreSeries(series []tsdb.RefSeries, index int) {
temp := make(map[uint64][]prompb.Label, len(series))
for _, s := range series {
ls := make(model.LabelSet, len(s.Labels))
for _, label := range s.Labels {
ls[model.LabelName(label.Name)] = model.LabelValue(label.Value)
}
temp[s.Ref] = labelsetToLabelsProto(ls)
}
wtm.seriesLock.Lock()
defer wtm.seriesLock.Unlock()
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
for ref, labels := range temp {
wtm.seriesLabels[ref] = labels
wtm.seriesSegmentIndexes[ref] = index
}
}
func (wtm *writeToMock) SeriesReset(index int) {
// Check for series that are in segments older than the checkpoint
// that were not also present in the checkpoint.
wtm.seriesLock.Lock()
defer wtm.seriesLock.Unlock()
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
for k, v := range wtm.seriesSegmentIndexes {
if v < index {
delete(wtm.seriesLabels, k)
delete(wtm.seriesSegmentIndexes, k)
}
}
}
func (wtm *writeToMock) checkNumLabels() int {
wtm.seriesLock.Lock()
defer wtm.seriesLock.Unlock()
return len(wtm.seriesLabels)
}
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
func newWriteToMock() *writeToMock {
return &writeToMock{
seriesLabels: make(map[uint64][]prompb.Label),
seriesSegmentIndexes: make(map[uint64]int),
}
}
func Test_readToEnd_noCheckpoint(t *testing.T) {
pageSize := 32 * 1024
const seriesCount = 10
const samplesCount = 250
dir, err := ioutil.TempDir("", "readToEnd_noCheckpoint")
testutil.Ok(t, err)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir)
wdir := path.Join(dir, "wal")
err = os.Mkdir(wdir, 0777)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
w, err := wal.NewSize(nil, nil, wdir, 128*pageSize)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
var recs [][]byte
enc := tsdb.RecordEncoder{}
for i := 0; i < seriesCount; i++ {
series := enc.Series([]tsdb.RefSeries{
tsdb.RefSeries{
Ref: uint64(i),
Labels: labels.Labels{labels.Label{"__name__", fmt.Sprintf("metric_%d", i)}},
},
}, nil)
recs = append(recs, series)
for j := 0; j < samplesCount; j++ {
sample := enc.Samples([]tsdb.RefSample{
tsdb.RefSample{
Ref: uint64(j),
T: int64(i),
V: float64(i),
},
}, nil)
recs = append(recs, sample)
// Randomly batch up records.
if rand.Intn(4) < 3 {
testutil.Ok(t, w.Log(recs...))
recs = recs[:0]
}
}
}
testutil.Ok(t, w.Log(recs...))
_, _, err = w.Segments()
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
testutil.Ok(t, err)
wt := newWriteToMock()
st := timestamp.FromTime(time.Now())
watcher := NewWALWatcher(nil, "", wt, dir, st)
go watcher.Start()
i := 0
ticker := time.NewTicker(100 * time.Millisecond)
for range ticker.C {
if wt.checkNumLabels() >= seriesCount*10*2 {
break
}
i++
if i >= 10 {
break
}
}
watcher.Stop()
ticker.Stop()
testutil.Equals(t, seriesCount, wt.checkNumLabels())
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
}
func Test_readToEnd_withCheckpoint(t *testing.T) {
pageSize := 32 * 1024
const seriesCount = 10
const samplesCount = 250
dir, err := ioutil.TempDir("", "readToEnd_withCheckpoint")
testutil.Ok(t, err)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir)
wdir := path.Join(dir, "wal")
err = os.Mkdir(wdir, 0777)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
os.Create(wal.SegmentName(wdir, 30))
enc := tsdb.RecordEncoder{}
w, err := wal.NewSize(nil, nil, wdir, 128*pageSize)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
// Write to the initial segment then checkpoint.
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
for i := 0; i < seriesCount*10; i++ {
ref := i + 100
series := enc.Series([]tsdb.RefSeries{
tsdb.RefSeries{
Ref: uint64(ref),
Labels: labels.Labels{labels.Label{"__name__", fmt.Sprintf("metric_%d", i)}},
},
}, nil)
testutil.Ok(t, w.Log(series))
for j := 0; j < samplesCount*10; j++ {
inner := rand.Intn(ref + 1)
sample := enc.Samples([]tsdb.RefSample{
tsdb.RefSample{
Ref: uint64(inner),
T: int64(i),
V: float64(i),
},
}, nil)
testutil.Ok(t, w.Log(sample))
}
}
tsdb.Checkpoint(w, 30, 31, func(x uint64) bool { return true }, 0)
w.Truncate(32)
// Write more records after checkpointing.
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
for i := 0; i < seriesCount*10; i++ {
series := enc.Series([]tsdb.RefSeries{
tsdb.RefSeries{
Ref: uint64(i),
Labels: labels.Labels{labels.Label{"__name__", fmt.Sprintf("metric_%d", i)}},
},
}, nil)
testutil.Ok(t, w.Log(series))
for j := 0; j < samplesCount*10; j++ {
sample := enc.Samples([]tsdb.RefSample{
tsdb.RefSample{
Ref: uint64(j),
T: int64(i),
V: float64(i),
},
}, nil)
testutil.Ok(t, w.Log(sample))
}
}
_, _, err = w.Segments()
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
testutil.Ok(t, err)
wt := newWriteToMock()
st := timestamp.FromTime(time.Now())
watcher := NewWALWatcher(nil, "", wt, dir, st)
go watcher.Start()
i := 0
ticker := time.NewTicker(100 * time.Millisecond)
for range ticker.C {
if wt.checkNumLabels() >= seriesCount*10*2 {
break
}
i++
if i >= 20 {
break
}
}
watcher.Stop()
ticker.Stop()
testutil.Equals(t, seriesCount*10*2, wt.checkNumLabels())
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
}
func Test_readCheckpoint(t *testing.T) {
pageSize := 32 * 1024
const seriesCount = 10
const samplesCount = 250
dir, err := ioutil.TempDir("", "readCheckpoint")
testutil.Ok(t, err)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir)
wdir := path.Join(dir, "wal")
err = os.Mkdir(wdir, 0777)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
os.Create(wal.SegmentName(wdir, 30))
enc := tsdb.RecordEncoder{}
w, err := wal.NewSize(nil, nil, wdir, 128*pageSize)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
// Write to the initial segment then checkpoint.
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
for i := 0; i < seriesCount*10; i++ {
ref := i + 100
series := enc.Series([]tsdb.RefSeries{
tsdb.RefSeries{
Ref: uint64(ref),
Labels: labels.Labels{labels.Label{"__name__", fmt.Sprintf("metric_%d", i)}},
},
}, nil)
testutil.Ok(t, w.Log(series))
for j := 0; j < samplesCount*10; j++ {
inner := rand.Intn(ref + 1)
sample := enc.Samples([]tsdb.RefSample{
tsdb.RefSample{
Ref: uint64(inner),
T: int64(i),
V: float64(i),
},
}, nil)
testutil.Ok(t, w.Log(sample))
}
}
tsdb.Checkpoint(w, 30, 31, func(x uint64) bool { return true }, 0)
w.Truncate(32)
// Start read after checkpoint, no more data written.
_, _, err = w.Segments()
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
testutil.Ok(t, err)
wt := newWriteToMock()
st := timestamp.FromTime(time.Now())
watcher := NewWALWatcher(nil, "", wt, dir, st)
go watcher.Start()
i := 0
ticker := time.NewTicker(100 * time.Millisecond)
for range ticker.C {
if wt.checkNumLabels() >= seriesCount*10*2 {
break
}
i++
if i >= 8 {
break
}
}
watcher.Stop()
ticker.Stop()
testutil.Equals(t, seriesCount*10, wt.checkNumLabels())
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
}
func Test_checkpoint_seriesReset(t *testing.T) {
pageSize := 32 * 1024
const seriesCount = 10
const samplesCount = 250
dir, err := ioutil.TempDir("", "seriesReset")
testutil.Ok(t, err)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir)
wdir := path.Join(dir, "wal")
err = os.Mkdir(wdir, 0777)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
enc := tsdb.RecordEncoder{}
w, err := wal.NewSize(nil, nil, wdir, pageSize)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
// Write to the initial segment, then checkpoint later.
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
for i := 0; i < seriesCount*10; i++ {
ref := i + 100
series := enc.Series([]tsdb.RefSeries{
tsdb.RefSeries{
Ref: uint64(ref),
Labels: labels.Labels{labels.Label{"__name__", fmt.Sprintf("metric_%d", i)}},
},
}, nil)
testutil.Ok(t, w.Log(series))
for j := 0; j < samplesCount*10; j++ {
inner := rand.Intn(ref + 1)
sample := enc.Samples([]tsdb.RefSample{
tsdb.RefSample{
Ref: uint64(inner),
T: int64(i),
V: float64(i),
},
}, nil)
testutil.Ok(t, w.Log(sample))
}
}
_, _, err = w.Segments()
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
testutil.Ok(t, err)
wt := newWriteToMock()
st := timestamp.FromTime(time.Now())
watcher := NewWALWatcher(nil, "", wt, dir, st)
go watcher.Start()
i := 0
ticker := time.NewTicker(100 * time.Millisecond)
for range ticker.C {
if wt.checkNumLabels() >= seriesCount*10*2 {
break
}
i++
if i >= 50 {
break
}
}
watcher.Stop()
ticker.Stop()
testutil.Equals(t, seriesCount*10, wt.checkNumLabels())
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
// If you modify the checkpoint and truncate segment #'s run the test to see how
// many series records you end up with and change the last Equals check accordingly
// or modify the Equals to Assert(len(wt.seriesLabels) < seriesCount*10)
_, err = tsdb.Checkpoint(w, 50, 200, func(x uint64) bool { return true }, 0)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
w.Truncate(200)
cp, _, err := tsdb.LastCheckpoint(path.Join(dir, "wal"))
testutil.Ok(t, err)
err = watcher.readCheckpoint(cp)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
}
func Test_decodeRecord(t *testing.T) {
dir, err := ioutil.TempDir("", "decodeRecord")
testutil.Ok(t, err)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir)
wt := newWriteToMock()
// st := timestamp.FromTime(time.Now().Add(-10 * time.Second))
watcher := NewWALWatcher(nil, "", wt, dir, 0)
Tail the TSDB WAL for remote_write This change switches the remote_write API to use the TSDB WAL. This should reduce memory usage and prevent sample loss when the remote end point is down. We use the new LiveReader from TSDB to tail WAL segments. Logic for finding the tracking segment is included in this PR. The WAL is tailed once for each remote_write endpoint specified. Reading from the segment is based on a ticker rather than relying on fsnotify write events, which were found to be complicated and unreliable in early prototypes. Enqueuing a sample for sending via remote_write can now block, to provide back pressure. Queues are still required to acheive parallelism and batching. We have updated the queue config based on new defaults for queue capacity and pending samples values - much smaller values are now possible. The remote_write resharding code has been updated to prevent deadlocks, and extra tests have been added for these cases. As part of this change, we attempt to guarantee that samples are not lost; however this initial version doesn't guarantee this across Prometheus restarts or non-retryable errors from the remote end (eg 400s). This changes also includes the following optimisations: - only marshal the proto request once, not once per retry - maintain a single copy of the labels for given series to reduce GC pressure Other minor tweaks: - only reshard if we've also successfully sent recently - add pending samples, latest sent timestamp, WAL events processed metrics Co-authored-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks.com> (initial prototype) Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com> (sharding changes) Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
2018-09-07 21:26:04 +00:00
// decode a series record
enc := tsdb.RecordEncoder{}
buf := enc.Series([]tsdb.RefSeries{tsdb.RefSeries{Ref: 1234, Labels: labels.Labels{}}}, nil)
watcher.decodeRecord(buf)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
testutil.Equals(t, 1, len(wt.seriesLabels))
// decode a samples record
buf = enc.Samples([]tsdb.RefSample{tsdb.RefSample{Ref: 100, T: 1, V: 1.0}, tsdb.RefSample{Ref: 100, T: 2, V: 2.0}}, nil)
watcher.decodeRecord(buf)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
testutil.Equals(t, 2, wt.samplesAppended)
}
func Test_decodeRecord_afterStart(t *testing.T) {
dir, err := ioutil.TempDir("", "decodeRecord")
testutil.Ok(t, err)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir)
wt := newWriteToMock()
// st := timestamp.FromTime(time.Now().Add(-10 * time.Second))
watcher := NewWALWatcher(nil, "", wt, dir, 1)
// decode a series record
enc := tsdb.RecordEncoder{}
buf := enc.Series([]tsdb.RefSeries{tsdb.RefSeries{Ref: 1234, Labels: labels.Labels{}}}, nil)
watcher.decodeRecord(buf)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
testutil.Equals(t, 1, len(wt.seriesLabels))
// decode a samples record
buf = enc.Samples([]tsdb.RefSample{tsdb.RefSample{Ref: 100, T: 1, V: 1.0}, tsdb.RefSample{Ref: 100, T: 2, V: 2.0}}, nil)
watcher.decodeRecord(buf)
testutil.Ok(t, err)
testutil.Equals(t, 1, wt.samplesAppended)
}