mirror of
git://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/openwrt.git
synced 2024-12-12 18:05:15 +00:00
ramips: fix two-way hash and auto ageout on MT7621
Current code directly writes the FOE entry to hash_val+1 position when hash collision occurs. However, it is found that this behavior will cause the cache and the hardware FOE table to be inconsistent. For example, there are three flows, and their hashed values are all equal to 100. The first flow is written to the position of 100. The second flow is written to the position of 100+1. Then, the logic of the current code will also write the third flow to 100+1. At this time, the cache has flow 1 and 2; and the hardware FOE table has flow 1 and 3, where these two parts store different contents. So it is necessary to check whether the hash_val+1 is also occupied before writing. If hash_val+1 is also occupied, we won’t bind th third flow to the FOE table. Addition to that, we also cancel the processing of foe_entry removal because the hardware has auto age-out ability. The hardware will periodically iterate through the FOE table to find out the time-out entry and set it as INVALID. Signed-off-by: HsiuWen Yen <y.hsiuwen@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
45a2771953
commit
fe7d965ea9
@ -119,11 +119,11 @@ mtk_foe_set_mac(struct mtk_foe_entry *entry, u8 *smac, u8 *dmac)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
mtk_check_hashcollision(struct mtk_eth *eth, u32 hash)
|
||||
mtk_check_entry_available(struct mtk_eth *eth, u32 hash)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct mtk_foe_entry entry = ((struct mtk_foe_entry *)eth->foe_table)[hash];
|
||||
|
||||
return (entry.bfib1.state != BIND)? 0:1;
|
||||
return (entry.bfib1.state == BIND)? 0:1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ int mtk_flow_offload(struct mtk_eth *eth,
|
||||
|
||||
if (otuple->l4proto != IPPROTO_TCP && otuple->l4proto != IPPROTO_UDP)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (type == FLOW_OFFLOAD_DEL) {
|
||||
flow = NULL;
|
||||
synchronize_rcu();
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
switch (otuple->l3proto) {
|
||||
case AF_INET:
|
||||
@ -174,30 +180,25 @@ int mtk_flow_offload(struct mtk_eth *eth,
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (type == FLOW_OFFLOAD_DEL) {
|
||||
orig.bfib1.state = INVALID;
|
||||
reply.bfib1.state = INVALID;
|
||||
flow = NULL;
|
||||
goto write;
|
||||
/* Two-way hash: when hash collision occurs, the hash value will be shifted to the next position. */
|
||||
if (!mtk_check_entry_available(eth, ohash)){
|
||||
if (!mtk_check_entry_available(eth, ohash + 1))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
ohash += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!mtk_check_entry_available(eth, rhash)){
|
||||
if (!mtk_check_entry_available(eth, rhash + 1))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
rhash += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Two-way hash: when hash collision occurs, the hash value will be shifted to the next position. */
|
||||
if(mtk_check_hashcollision(eth, ohash))
|
||||
ohash += 1;
|
||||
if(mtk_check_hashcollision(eth, rhash))
|
||||
rhash += 1;
|
||||
mtk_foe_set_mac(&orig, dest->eth_src, dest->eth_dest);
|
||||
mtk_foe_set_mac(&reply, src->eth_src, src->eth_dest);
|
||||
|
||||
write:
|
||||
mtk_foe_write(eth, ohash, &orig);
|
||||
mtk_foe_write(eth, rhash, &reply);
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(eth->foe_flow_table[ohash], flow);
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(eth->foe_flow_table[rhash], flow);
|
||||
|
||||
if (type == FLOW_OFFLOAD_DEL)
|
||||
synchronize_rcu();
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user