musl/arch/arm
Rich Felker 321f4fa906 add max_align_t definition for C11 and C++11
unfortunately this needs to be able to vary by arch, because of a huge
mess GCC made: the GCC definition, which became the ABI, depends on
quirks in GCC's definition of __alignof__, which does not match the
formal alignment of the type.

GCC's __alignof__ unexpectedly exposes the an implementation detail,
its "preferred alignment" for the type, rather than the formal/ABI
alignment of the type, which it only actually uses in structures. on
most archs the two values are the same, but on some (at least i386)
the preferred alignment is greater than the ABI alignment.

I considered using _Alignas(8) unconditionally, but on at least one
arch (or1k), the alignment of max_align_t with GCC's definition is
only 4 (even the "preferred alignment" for these types is only 4).
2014-08-20 17:20:14 -04:00
..
bits add max_align_t definition for C11 and C++11 2014-08-20 17:20:14 -04:00
src add some ARM EABI-specific exception handling infrastructure 2013-07-10 16:11:01 -04:00
atomic.h clean up unused and inconsistent atomics in arch dirs 2014-07-27 21:50:24 -04:00
crt_arch.h add function types to arm crt assembly 2013-08-15 14:52:27 -04:00
pthread_arch.h fix arm thread-pointer/atomic asm when compiling to thumb code 2014-04-30 15:32:11 -04:00
reloc.h refactor to remove arch-specific relocation code from dynamic linker 2014-06-18 02:44:02 -04:00
syscall_arch.h fixup general __syscall breakage introduced in x32 port 2014-02-24 17:06:06 -05:00