fix getopt[_long] clobbering of optopt on success

getopt is only specified to modify optopt on error, and some software
apparently infers an error from optopt!=0.

getopt_long is changed analogously. the resulting behavior differs
slightly from the behavior of the GNU implementation of getopt_long,
which keeps an internal shadow copy of optopt and copies it to the
public one on return, but since the GNU implementation also exhibits
this shadow-copy behavior for plain getopt where is is non-conforming,
I think this can reasonably be considered a bug rather than an
intentional behavior that merits mimicing.
This commit is contained in:
Rich Felker 2017-01-04 19:02:02 -05:00
parent 150747b41e
commit 786fda875a
2 changed files with 5 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ int getopt(int argc, char * const argv[], const char *optstring)
c = 0xfffd; /* replacement char */
}
optchar = argv[optind]+optpos;
optopt = c;
optpos += k;
if (!argv[optind][optpos]) {
@ -79,6 +78,7 @@ int getopt(int argc, char * const argv[], const char *optstring)
} while (l && d != c);
if (d != c) {
optopt = c;
if (optstring[0] != ':' && opterr)
__getopt_msg(argv[0], ": unrecognized option: ", optchar, k);
return '?';
@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ int getopt(int argc, char * const argv[], const char *optstring)
if (optstring[i] == ':') {
if (optstring[i+1] == ':') optarg = 0;
else if (optind >= argc) {
optopt = c;
if (optstring[0] == ':') return ':';
if (opterr) __getopt_msg(argv[0],
": option requires an argument: ",

View File

@ -75,9 +75,9 @@ static int __getopt_long_core(int argc, char *const *argv, const char *optstring
if (cnt==1) {
i = match;
optind++;
optopt = longopts[i].val;
if (*opt == '=') {
if (!longopts[i].has_arg) {
optopt = longopts[i].val;
if (colon || !opterr)
return '?';
__getopt_msg(argv[0],
@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static int __getopt_long_core(int argc, char *const *argv, const char *optstring
optarg = opt+1;
} else if (longopts[i].has_arg == required_argument) {
if (!(optarg = argv[optind])) {
optopt = longopts[i].val;
if (colon) return ':';
if (!opterr) return '?';
__getopt_msg(argv[0],
@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ static int __getopt_long_core(int argc, char *const *argv, const char *optstring
return longopts[i].val;
}
if (argv[optind][1] == '-') {
optopt = 0;
if (!colon && opterr)
__getopt_msg(argv[0], cnt ?
": option is ambiguous: " :