This probably makes it much faster (I wouldn't know, I didn't run any
benchmarks ). Seems to work as well (although I'm not sure, it's not
like I'd perform rigorous tests).
The scale_zimg test seems to mysteriously treat color in fully
transparent alpha differently, which makes no sense, and isn't visible
(but makes the test fail). I can't be bothered with investigating this
more. What do you do with failing tests? Correct, you disable them. Or
rather, you disable whatever appears to cause them to fail, which is the
threading in this case.
This change follows mostly the tile_example.cpp. The slice size uses a
minimum of 64, which was suggested by the zimg author. Some of this
commit is a bit inelegant and weird, such as recomputing the scale
factor for every slice, or the way slice_h is managed. Too lazy to make
this more elegant.
zimg git had a regressio around active_region (which is needed by the
slicing), which was fixed in commit 83071706b2e6bc634. Apparently, the
bug was never released, so just add a warning to the manpage.
The intention is to add slice-threading to the wrapper. For that
purpose, move all zimg related state to a new struct mp_zimg_state.
There is now an array of instances of this struct. The intention is to
have one instance for each thread. As of this commit, this is hardcoded
to 1 thread; the following commit extends this.
Raise swscale and zimg default parameters. This restores screenshot
quality settings (maybe) unset in the commit before. Also expose some
more libswscale and zimg options.
Since these options are also used for VOs like x11 and drm, this will
make x11/drm/etc. much slower. For compensation, provide a profile that
sets the old option values: sw-fast. I'm also enabling zimg here, just
as an experiment.
The core problem is that we have a single set of command line options
which control the settings used for most swscale/zimg uses. This was
done in the previous commit. It cannot differentiate between the VOs,
which need to be realtime and may accept/require lower quality options,
and things like screenshots or vo_image, which can be slower, but should
not sacrifice quality by default.
Should this have two sets of options or something similar to do the
right thing depending on the code which calls libswscale? Maybe. Or
should I just ignore the problem, make it someone else's problem (users
who want to use software conversion VOs), provide a sub-optimal
solution, and call it a day? Definitely, sounds good, pushing to master,
goodbye.
Purpose uncertain. I guess it's slightly better, maybe.
The move of the sws/zimg options from VO opts (vo_opt_list) to the
top-level option list is tricky. VO opts have some helper code in vo.c,
that sends VOCTRL_SET_PANSCAN to the VO on every VO opts change. That's
because updating certain VO options used to be this way (and not just
the panscan option). This isn't needed anymore for sws/zimg options, so
explicitly move them away.
This provides a very similar API to sws_utils.h, which can be used to
convert and scale from one mp_image to another.
This commit adds only the code, but does not use it anywhere.
The code is quite preliminary and barely tested. It supports only a few
pixel formats, and will return failure for many others. (Unlike
libswscale, which tries to support anything that FFmpeg knows.)
zimg itself accepts only planar formats. Supporting other formats
requires manual packing/unpacking. (Compared to libswscale, the zimg API
is generally lower level, but allows for more flexibility.) Only BGR0
output was actually tested. It appears to work.
wm4