RepoMirrors/mpv
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv synced 2025-01-29 11:12:56 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Joe Barr calls us Mplayer.

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@12230 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2
This commit is contained in:
diego 2004-04-17 23:21:05 +00:00
parent 12879e2b5d
commit abbc09b604
1 changed files with 7 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
DOCS/xml/en/users-vs-dev.xml
View File

@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ GCC 2.96, and started recommending other compilers. Examples are
<ulink url="http://www.mysql.com/downloads/mysql-3.23.html">MySQL</ulink>, <ulink url="http://www.mysql.com/downloads/mysql-3.23.html">MySQL</ulink>,
and and
<ulink url="http://avifile.sourceforge.net/news-old1.htm">avifile</ulink>. <ulink url="http://avifile.sourceforge.net/news-old1.htm">avifile</ulink>.
Other interesting links are Other interesting links are
<ulink url="http://www.atnf.csiro.au/people/rgooch/linux/docs/kernel-newsflash.html"> <ulink url="http://www.atnf.csiro.au/people/rgooch/linux/docs/kernel-newsflash.html">
Linux kernel news flash about kernel 2.4.17</ulink> Linux kernel news flash about kernel 2.4.17</ulink>
and and
@ -187,13 +187,15 @@ he quotes his exchange with G
that perfectly summarizes the whole situation: that perfectly summarizes the whole situation:
<blockquote><para> <blockquote><para>
However, he also went on to say that he was "surprised" by my column about However, he also went on to say that he was &quot;surprised&quot; by my column
<application>MPlayer</application> and thought it was unfair, reminding me that it is about <application>Mplayer</application> and thought it was unfair, reminding
a free software project. "If you don't like it," Bartsch said, "you're free not to use it." me that it is a free software project. &quot;If you don't like it,&quot;
Bartsch said, &quot;you're free not to use it.&quot;
</para></blockquote> </para></blockquote>
Almost two years later in october 2003 he wrote another review called Almost two years later in october 2003 he wrote another review called
<ulink url="http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=03/10/02/0343200">Mplayer revisited</ulink>. <ulink url="http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=03/10/02/0343200">Mplayer revisited</ulink>
(wrong spelling preserved).
In it he came to the following conclusions: In it he came to the following conclusions:
<blockquote><para> <blockquote><para>