mpv/video/vdpau.c

456 lines
15 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

vdpau: split off decoder parts, use "new" libavcodec vdpau hwaccel API Move the decoder parts from vo_vdpau.c to a new file vdpau_old.c. This file is named so because because it's written against the "old" libavcodec vdpau pseudo-decoder (e.g. "h264_vdpau"). Add support for the "new" libavcodec vdpau support. This was recently added and replaces the "old" vdpau parts. (In fact, Libav is about to deprecate and remove the "old" API without deprecation grace period, so we have to support it now. Moreover, there will probably be no Libav release which supports both, so the transition is even less smooth than we could hope, and we have to support both the old and new API.) Whether the old or new API is used is checked by a configure test: if the new API is found, it is used, otherwise the old API is assumed. Some details might be handled differently. Especially display preemption is a bit problematic with the "new" libavcodec vdpau support: it wants to keep a pointer to a specific vdpau API function (which can be driver specific, because preemption might switch drivers). Also, surface IDs are now directly stored in AVFrames (and mp_images), so they can't be forced to VDP_INVALID_HANDLE on preemption. (This changes even with older libavcodec versions, because mp_image always uses the newer representation to make vo_vdpau.c simpler.) Decoder initialization in the new code tries to deal with codec profiles, while the old code always uses the highest profile per codec. Surface allocation changes. Since the decoder won't call config() in vo_vdpau.c on video size change anymore, we allow allocating surfaces of arbitrary size instead of locking it to what the VO was configured. The non-hwdec code also has slightly different allocation behavior now. Enabling the old vdpau special decoders via e.g. --vd=lavc:h264_vdpau doesn't work anymore (a warning suggesting the --hwdec option is printed instead).
2013-07-27 23:49:45 +00:00
/*
* This file is part of mpv.
*
* mpv is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* mpv is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
* with mpv. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
#include <assert.h>
vdpau: split off decoder parts, use "new" libavcodec vdpau hwaccel API Move the decoder parts from vo_vdpau.c to a new file vdpau_old.c. This file is named so because because it's written against the "old" libavcodec vdpau pseudo-decoder (e.g. "h264_vdpau"). Add support for the "new" libavcodec vdpau support. This was recently added and replaces the "old" vdpau parts. (In fact, Libav is about to deprecate and remove the "old" API without deprecation grace period, so we have to support it now. Moreover, there will probably be no Libav release which supports both, so the transition is even less smooth than we could hope, and we have to support both the old and new API.) Whether the old or new API is used is checked by a configure test: if the new API is found, it is used, otherwise the old API is assumed. Some details might be handled differently. Especially display preemption is a bit problematic with the "new" libavcodec vdpau support: it wants to keep a pointer to a specific vdpau API function (which can be driver specific, because preemption might switch drivers). Also, surface IDs are now directly stored in AVFrames (and mp_images), so they can't be forced to VDP_INVALID_HANDLE on preemption. (This changes even with older libavcodec versions, because mp_image always uses the newer representation to make vo_vdpau.c simpler.) Decoder initialization in the new code tries to deal with codec profiles, while the old code always uses the highest profile per codec. Surface allocation changes. Since the decoder won't call config() in vo_vdpau.c on video size change anymore, we allow allocating surfaces of arbitrary size instead of locking it to what the VO was configured. The non-hwdec code also has slightly different allocation behavior now. Enabling the old vdpau special decoders via e.g. --vd=lavc:h264_vdpau doesn't work anymore (a warning suggesting the --hwdec option is printed instead).
2013-07-27 23:49:45 +00:00
#include "vdpau.h"
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
#include "osdep/threads.h"
#include "osdep/timer.h"
#include "video/out/x11_common.h"
vdpau: split off decoder parts, use "new" libavcodec vdpau hwaccel API Move the decoder parts from vo_vdpau.c to a new file vdpau_old.c. This file is named so because because it's written against the "old" libavcodec vdpau pseudo-decoder (e.g. "h264_vdpau"). Add support for the "new" libavcodec vdpau support. This was recently added and replaces the "old" vdpau parts. (In fact, Libav is about to deprecate and remove the "old" API without deprecation grace period, so we have to support it now. Moreover, there will probably be no Libav release which supports both, so the transition is even less smooth than we could hope, and we have to support both the old and new API.) Whether the old or new API is used is checked by a configure test: if the new API is found, it is used, otherwise the old API is assumed. Some details might be handled differently. Especially display preemption is a bit problematic with the "new" libavcodec vdpau support: it wants to keep a pointer to a specific vdpau API function (which can be driver specific, because preemption might switch drivers). Also, surface IDs are now directly stored in AVFrames (and mp_images), so they can't be forced to VDP_INVALID_HANDLE on preemption. (This changes even with older libavcodec versions, because mp_image always uses the newer representation to make vo_vdpau.c simpler.) Decoder initialization in the new code tries to deal with codec profiles, while the old code always uses the highest profile per codec. Surface allocation changes. Since the decoder won't call config() in vo_vdpau.c on video size change anymore, we allow allocating surfaces of arbitrary size instead of locking it to what the VO was configured. The non-hwdec code also has slightly different allocation behavior now. Enabling the old vdpau special decoders via e.g. --vd=lavc:h264_vdpau doesn't work anymore (a warning suggesting the --hwdec option is printed instead).
2013-07-27 23:49:45 +00:00
#include "video/img_format.h"
#include "video/mp_image.h"
static void mark_vdpau_objects_uninitialized(struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx)
{
for (int i = 0; i < MAX_VIDEO_SURFACES; i++) {
ctx->video_surfaces[i].surface = VDP_INVALID_HANDLE;
ctx->video_surfaces[i].osurface = VDP_INVALID_HANDLE;
ctx->video_surfaces[i].allocated = false;
}
ctx->vdp_device = VDP_INVALID_HANDLE;
}
static void preemption_callback(VdpDevice device, void *context)
{
struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx = context;
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
pthread_mutex_lock(&ctx->preempt_lock);
ctx->is_preempted = true;
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
pthread_mutex_unlock(&ctx->preempt_lock);
}
static int win_x11_init_vdpau_procs(struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx)
{
struct vo_x11_state *x11 = ctx->x11;
VdpStatus vdp_st;
// Don't operate on ctx->vdp directly, so that even if init fails, ctx->vdp
// will have the function pointers from the previous successful init, and
// won't randomly make other code crash on calling NULL pointers.
struct vdp_functions vdp = {0};
if (!x11)
return -1;
struct vdp_function {
const int id;
int offset;
};
static const struct vdp_function vdp_func[] = {
#define VDP_FUNCTION(_, macro_name, mp_name) {macro_name, offsetof(struct vdp_functions, mp_name)},
#include "video/vdpau_functions.inc"
#undef VDP_FUNCTION
{0, -1}
};
VdpGetProcAddress *get_proc_address;
vdp_st = vdp_device_create_x11(x11->display, x11->screen, &ctx->vdp_device,
&get_proc_address);
if (vdp_st != VDP_STATUS_OK) {
if (ctx->is_preempted)
MP_DBG(ctx, "Error calling vdp_device_create_x11 while preempted: %d\n",
vdp_st);
else
MP_ERR(ctx, "Error when calling vdp_device_create_x11: %d\n", vdp_st);
return -1;
}
for (const struct vdp_function *dsc = vdp_func; dsc->offset >= 0; dsc++) {
vdp_st = get_proc_address(ctx->vdp_device, dsc->id,
(void **)((char *)&vdp + dsc->offset));
if (vdp_st != VDP_STATUS_OK) {
MP_ERR(ctx, "Error when calling vdp_get_proc_address(function "
"id %d): %s\n", dsc->id,
vdp.get_error_string ? vdp.get_error_string(vdp_st) : "?");
return -1;
}
}
ctx->vdp = vdp;
ctx->get_proc_address = get_proc_address;
vdp_st = vdp.preemption_callback_register(ctx->vdp_device,
preemption_callback, ctx);
return 0;
}
static int handle_preemption(struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx)
{
if (!ctx->is_preempted)
return 0;
mark_vdpau_objects_uninitialized(ctx);
if (!ctx->preemption_user_notified) {
MP_ERR(ctx, "Got display preemption notice! Will attempt to recover.\n");
ctx->preemption_user_notified = true;
}
/* Trying to initialize seems to be quite slow, so only try once a
* second to avoid using 100% CPU. */
if (ctx->last_preemption_retry_fail &&
mp_time_sec() - ctx->last_preemption_retry_fail < 1.0)
return -1;
if (win_x11_init_vdpau_procs(ctx) < 0) {
ctx->last_preemption_retry_fail = mp_time_sec();
return -1;
}
ctx->preemption_user_notified = false;
ctx->last_preemption_retry_fail = 0;
ctx->is_preempted = false;
ctx->preemption_counter++;
MP_INFO(ctx, "Recovered from display preemption.\n");
return 1;
}
vdpau: split off decoder parts, use "new" libavcodec vdpau hwaccel API Move the decoder parts from vo_vdpau.c to a new file vdpau_old.c. This file is named so because because it's written against the "old" libavcodec vdpau pseudo-decoder (e.g. "h264_vdpau"). Add support for the "new" libavcodec vdpau support. This was recently added and replaces the "old" vdpau parts. (In fact, Libav is about to deprecate and remove the "old" API without deprecation grace period, so we have to support it now. Moreover, there will probably be no Libav release which supports both, so the transition is even less smooth than we could hope, and we have to support both the old and new API.) Whether the old or new API is used is checked by a configure test: if the new API is found, it is used, otherwise the old API is assumed. Some details might be handled differently. Especially display preemption is a bit problematic with the "new" libavcodec vdpau support: it wants to keep a pointer to a specific vdpau API function (which can be driver specific, because preemption might switch drivers). Also, surface IDs are now directly stored in AVFrames (and mp_images), so they can't be forced to VDP_INVALID_HANDLE on preemption. (This changes even with older libavcodec versions, because mp_image always uses the newer representation to make vo_vdpau.c simpler.) Decoder initialization in the new code tries to deal with codec profiles, while the old code always uses the highest profile per codec. Surface allocation changes. Since the decoder won't call config() in vo_vdpau.c on video size change anymore, we allow allocating surfaces of arbitrary size instead of locking it to what the VO was configured. The non-hwdec code also has slightly different allocation behavior now. Enabling the old vdpau special decoders via e.g. --vd=lavc:h264_vdpau doesn't work anymore (a warning suggesting the --hwdec option is printed instead).
2013-07-27 23:49:45 +00:00
// Check whether vdpau display preemption happened. The caller provides a
// preemption counter, which contains the logical timestamp of the last
// preemption handled by the caller. The counter can be 0 for init.
// Return values:
// -1: the display is currently preempted, and vdpau can't be used
// 0: a preemption event happened, and the caller must recover
// (*counter is updated, and a second call will report status ok)
// 1: everything is fine, no preemption happened
int mp_vdpau_handle_preemption(struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx, uint64_t *counter)
{
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
int r = 1;
pthread_mutex_lock(&ctx->preempt_lock);
// First time init
if (!*counter)
*counter = ctx->preemption_counter;
if (handle_preemption(ctx) < 0)
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
r = -1;
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
if (r > 0 && *counter < ctx->preemption_counter) {
*counter = ctx->preemption_counter;
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
r = 0; // signal recovery after preemption
}
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
pthread_mutex_unlock(&ctx->preempt_lock);
return r;
}
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
struct surface_ref {
struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx;
int index;
};
static void release_decoder_surface(void *ptr)
{
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
struct surface_ref *r = ptr;
struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx = r->ctx;
pthread_mutex_lock(&ctx->pool_lock);
assert(ctx->video_surfaces[r->index].in_use);
ctx->video_surfaces[r->index].in_use = false;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&ctx->pool_lock);
talloc_free(r);
}
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
static struct mp_image *create_ref(struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx, int index)
{
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
struct surface_entry *e = &ctx->video_surfaces[index];
assert(!e->in_use);
e->in_use = true;
e->age = ctx->age_counter++;
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
struct surface_ref *ref = talloc_ptrtype(NULL, ref);
*ref = (struct surface_ref){ctx, index};
struct mp_image *res =
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
mp_image_new_custom_ref(&(struct mp_image){0}, ref,
release_decoder_surface);
if (res) {
mp_image_setfmt(res, e->rgb ? IMGFMT_VDPAU_OUTPUT : IMGFMT_VDPAU);
mp_image_set_size(res, e->w, e->h);
res->planes[0] = (void *)"dummy"; // must be non-NULL, otherwise arbitrary
res->planes[3] = (void *)(intptr_t)(e->rgb ? e->osurface : e->surface);
}
return res;
vdpau: split off decoder parts, use "new" libavcodec vdpau hwaccel API Move the decoder parts from vo_vdpau.c to a new file vdpau_old.c. This file is named so because because it's written against the "old" libavcodec vdpau pseudo-decoder (e.g. "h264_vdpau"). Add support for the "new" libavcodec vdpau support. This was recently added and replaces the "old" vdpau parts. (In fact, Libav is about to deprecate and remove the "old" API without deprecation grace period, so we have to support it now. Moreover, there will probably be no Libav release which supports both, so the transition is even less smooth than we could hope, and we have to support both the old and new API.) Whether the old or new API is used is checked by a configure test: if the new API is found, it is used, otherwise the old API is assumed. Some details might be handled differently. Especially display preemption is a bit problematic with the "new" libavcodec vdpau support: it wants to keep a pointer to a specific vdpau API function (which can be driver specific, because preemption might switch drivers). Also, surface IDs are now directly stored in AVFrames (and mp_images), so they can't be forced to VDP_INVALID_HANDLE on preemption. (This changes even with older libavcodec versions, because mp_image always uses the newer representation to make vo_vdpau.c simpler.) Decoder initialization in the new code tries to deal with codec profiles, while the old code always uses the highest profile per codec. Surface allocation changes. Since the decoder won't call config() in vo_vdpau.c on video size change anymore, we allow allocating surfaces of arbitrary size instead of locking it to what the VO was configured. The non-hwdec code also has slightly different allocation behavior now. Enabling the old vdpau special decoders via e.g. --vd=lavc:h264_vdpau doesn't work anymore (a warning suggesting the --hwdec option is printed instead).
2013-07-27 23:49:45 +00:00
}
static struct mp_image *mp_vdpau_get_surface(struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx,
VdpChromaType chroma,
VdpRGBAFormat rgb_format,
bool rgb, int w, int h)
vdpau: split off decoder parts, use "new" libavcodec vdpau hwaccel API Move the decoder parts from vo_vdpau.c to a new file vdpau_old.c. This file is named so because because it's written against the "old" libavcodec vdpau pseudo-decoder (e.g. "h264_vdpau"). Add support for the "new" libavcodec vdpau support. This was recently added and replaces the "old" vdpau parts. (In fact, Libav is about to deprecate and remove the "old" API without deprecation grace period, so we have to support it now. Moreover, there will probably be no Libav release which supports both, so the transition is even less smooth than we could hope, and we have to support both the old and new API.) Whether the old or new API is used is checked by a configure test: if the new API is found, it is used, otherwise the old API is assumed. Some details might be handled differently. Especially display preemption is a bit problematic with the "new" libavcodec vdpau support: it wants to keep a pointer to a specific vdpau API function (which can be driver specific, because preemption might switch drivers). Also, surface IDs are now directly stored in AVFrames (and mp_images), so they can't be forced to VDP_INVALID_HANDLE on preemption. (This changes even with older libavcodec versions, because mp_image always uses the newer representation to make vo_vdpau.c simpler.) Decoder initialization in the new code tries to deal with codec profiles, while the old code always uses the highest profile per codec. Surface allocation changes. Since the decoder won't call config() in vo_vdpau.c on video size change anymore, we allow allocating surfaces of arbitrary size instead of locking it to what the VO was configured. The non-hwdec code also has slightly different allocation behavior now. Enabling the old vdpau special decoders via e.g. --vd=lavc:h264_vdpau doesn't work anymore (a warning suggesting the --hwdec option is printed instead).
2013-07-27 23:49:45 +00:00
{
struct vdp_functions *vdp = &ctx->vdp;
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
int surface_index = -1;
VdpStatus vdp_st;
if (rgb) {
chroma = (VdpChromaType)-1;
} else {
rgb_format = (VdpChromaType)-1;
}
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
pthread_mutex_lock(&ctx->pool_lock);
// Destroy all unused surfaces that don't have matching parameters
for (int n = 0; n < MAX_VIDEO_SURFACES; n++) {
struct surface_entry *e = &ctx->video_surfaces[n];
if (!e->in_use && e->allocated) {
if (e->w != w || e->h != h || e->rgb != rgb ||
e->chroma != chroma || e->rgb_format != rgb_format)
{
if (e->rgb) {
vdp_st = vdp->output_surface_destroy(e->osurface);
} else {
vdp_st = vdp->video_surface_destroy(e->surface);
}
CHECK_VDP_WARNING(ctx, "Error when destroying surface");
e->surface = e->osurface = VDP_INVALID_HANDLE;
e->allocated = false;
}
}
}
// Try to find an existing unused surface
for (int n = 0; n < MAX_VIDEO_SURFACES; n++) {
struct surface_entry *e = &ctx->video_surfaces[n];
if (!e->in_use && e->allocated) {
assert(e->w == w && e->h == h);
assert(e->chroma == chroma);
assert(e->rgb_format == rgb_format);
assert(e->rgb == rgb);
if (surface_index >= 0) {
struct surface_entry *other = &ctx->video_surfaces[surface_index];
if (other->age < e->age)
continue;
}
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
surface_index = n;
}
}
if (surface_index >= 0)
goto done;
// Allocate new surface
for (int n = 0; n < MAX_VIDEO_SURFACES; n++) {
struct surface_entry *e = &ctx->video_surfaces[n];
if (!e->in_use) {
assert(e->surface == VDP_INVALID_HANDLE);
assert(e->osurface == VDP_INVALID_HANDLE);
assert(!e->allocated);
e->chroma = chroma;
e->rgb_format = rgb_format;
e->rgb = rgb;
e->w = w;
e->h = h;
if (rgb) {
vdp_st = vdp->output_surface_create(ctx->vdp_device, rgb_format,
w, h, &e->osurface);
e->allocated = e->osurface != VDP_INVALID_HANDLE;
} else {
vdp_st = vdp->video_surface_create(ctx->vdp_device, chroma,
w, h, &e->surface);
e->allocated = e->surface != VDP_INVALID_HANDLE;
}
CHECK_VDP_WARNING(ctx, "Error when allocating surface");
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
surface_index = n;
goto done;
}
}
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
done: ;
struct mp_image *mpi = NULL;
if (surface_index >= 0)
mpi = create_ref(ctx, surface_index);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&ctx->pool_lock);
if (!mpi)
MP_ERR(ctx, "no surfaces available in mp_vdpau_get_video_surface\n");
return mpi;
}
struct mp_image *mp_vdpau_get_video_surface(struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx,
VdpChromaType chroma, int w, int h)
{
return mp_vdpau_get_surface(ctx, chroma, 0, false, w, h);
}
struct mp_vdpau_ctx *mp_vdpau_create_device_x11(struct mp_log *log,
struct vo_x11_state *x11)
{
struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx = talloc_ptrtype(NULL, ctx);
*ctx = (struct mp_vdpau_ctx) {
.log = log,
.x11 = x11,
.preemption_counter = 1,
};
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
mpthread_mutex_init_recursive(&ctx->preempt_lock);
pthread_mutex_init(&ctx->pool_lock, NULL);
mark_vdpau_objects_uninitialized(ctx);
if (win_x11_init_vdpau_procs(ctx) < 0) {
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
mp_vdpau_destroy(ctx);
return NULL;
}
return ctx;
}
void mp_vdpau_destroy(struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx)
{
struct vdp_functions *vdp = &ctx->vdp;
VdpStatus vdp_st;
for (int i = 0; i < MAX_VIDEO_SURFACES; i++) {
// can't hold references past context lifetime
assert(!ctx->video_surfaces[i].in_use);
if (ctx->video_surfaces[i].surface != VDP_INVALID_HANDLE) {
vdp_st = vdp->video_surface_destroy(ctx->video_surfaces[i].surface);
2013-12-21 17:05:23 +00:00
CHECK_VDP_WARNING(ctx, "Error when calling vdp_video_surface_destroy");
}
if (ctx->video_surfaces[i].osurface != VDP_INVALID_HANDLE) {
vdp_st = vdp->output_surface_destroy(ctx->video_surfaces[i].osurface);
CHECK_VDP_WARNING(ctx, "Error when calling vdp_output_surface_destroy");
}
}
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
if (vdp->device_destroy && ctx->vdp_device != VDP_INVALID_HANDLE) {
vdp_st = vdp->device_destroy(ctx->vdp_device);
2013-12-21 17:05:23 +00:00
CHECK_VDP_WARNING(ctx, "Error when calling vdp_device_destroy");
}
vdpau: make mp_vdpau_ctx thread-safe Preparation so that various things related to video can run in different threads. One part to this is making the video surface pool safe. Another issue is the preemption mechanism, which continues to give us endless pain. In theory, it's probably impossible to handle preemption 100% correctly and race-condition free, unless _every_ API user in the same process uses a central, shared mutex to protect every vdpau API call. Otherwise, it could happen that one thread recovering from preemption allocates a vdpau object, and then another thread (which hasn't recovered yet) happens to free the object for some reason. This is because objects are referenced by integer IDs, and vdpau will reuse IDs invalidated by preemption after preemption. Since this is unreasonable, we're as lazy as possible when it comes to handling preemption. We don't do any locking around the mp_vdpau_ctx fields that are normally immutable, and only can change when recovering from preemption. In practice, this will work, because it doesn't matter whether not-yet-recovered components use the old or new vdpau function pointers or device ID. Code calls mp_vdpau_handle_preemption() anyway to check for the preemption event and possibly to recover, and that function acquires the lock protecting the preemption state. Another possible source of potential grandiose fuckup is the fact that the vdpau library is in fact only a tiny wrapper, and the real driver lives in a shared object dlopen()ed by the wrapper. The wrapper also calls dlclose() on the loaded shared object in some situations. One possible danger is that failing to recreate a vdpau device could trigger a dlclose() call, and that glibc might unload it. Currently, glibc implements full unloading of shared objects on the last dlclose() call, and if that happens, calls to function pointers pointing into the shared object would obviously crash. Fortunately, it seems the existing vdpau wrapper won't trigger this case and never unloads the driver once it's successfully loaded. To make it short, vdpau preemption opens up endless depths of WTFs. Another issue is that any participating thread might do the preemption recovery (whichever comes first). This is easier to implement. The implication is that we need threadsafe xlib. We just hope and pray that this will actually work. This also means that once vdpau code is actually involved in a multithreaded scenario, we have to add XInitThreads() to the X11 code.
2014-05-09 19:49:42 +00:00
pthread_mutex_destroy(&ctx->pool_lock);
pthread_mutex_destroy(&ctx->preempt_lock);
talloc_free(ctx);
vdpau: split off decoder parts, use "new" libavcodec vdpau hwaccel API Move the decoder parts from vo_vdpau.c to a new file vdpau_old.c. This file is named so because because it's written against the "old" libavcodec vdpau pseudo-decoder (e.g. "h264_vdpau"). Add support for the "new" libavcodec vdpau support. This was recently added and replaces the "old" vdpau parts. (In fact, Libav is about to deprecate and remove the "old" API without deprecation grace period, so we have to support it now. Moreover, there will probably be no Libav release which supports both, so the transition is even less smooth than we could hope, and we have to support both the old and new API.) Whether the old or new API is used is checked by a configure test: if the new API is found, it is used, otherwise the old API is assumed. Some details might be handled differently. Especially display preemption is a bit problematic with the "new" libavcodec vdpau support: it wants to keep a pointer to a specific vdpau API function (which can be driver specific, because preemption might switch drivers). Also, surface IDs are now directly stored in AVFrames (and mp_images), so they can't be forced to VDP_INVALID_HANDLE on preemption. (This changes even with older libavcodec versions, because mp_image always uses the newer representation to make vo_vdpau.c simpler.) Decoder initialization in the new code tries to deal with codec profiles, while the old code always uses the highest profile per codec. Surface allocation changes. Since the decoder won't call config() in vo_vdpau.c on video size change anymore, we allow allocating surfaces of arbitrary size instead of locking it to what the VO was configured. The non-hwdec code also has slightly different allocation behavior now. Enabling the old vdpau special decoders via e.g. --vd=lavc:h264_vdpau doesn't work anymore (a warning suggesting the --hwdec option is printed instead).
2013-07-27 23:49:45 +00:00
}
bool mp_vdpau_get_format(int imgfmt, VdpChromaType *out_chroma_type,
VdpYCbCrFormat *out_pixel_format)
{
VdpChromaType chroma = VDP_CHROMA_TYPE_420;
VdpYCbCrFormat ycbcr = (VdpYCbCrFormat)-1;
switch (imgfmt) {
case IMGFMT_420P:
ycbcr = VDP_YCBCR_FORMAT_YV12;
break;
case IMGFMT_NV12:
ycbcr = VDP_YCBCR_FORMAT_NV12;
break;
case IMGFMT_YUYV:
ycbcr = VDP_YCBCR_FORMAT_YUYV;
chroma = VDP_CHROMA_TYPE_422;
break;
case IMGFMT_UYVY:
ycbcr = VDP_YCBCR_FORMAT_UYVY;
chroma = VDP_CHROMA_TYPE_422;
break;
case IMGFMT_VDPAU:
break;
default:
return false;
}
if (out_chroma_type)
*out_chroma_type = chroma;
if (out_pixel_format)
*out_pixel_format = ycbcr;
return true;
}
bool mp_vdpau_get_rgb_format(int imgfmt, VdpRGBAFormat *out_rgba_format)
{
VdpRGBAFormat format = (VdpRGBAFormat)-1;
switch (imgfmt) {
case IMGFMT_BGR32:
format = VDP_RGBA_FORMAT_B8G8R8A8; break;
default:
return false;
}
if (out_rgba_format)
*out_rgba_format = format;
return true;
}
// Use mp_vdpau_get_video_surface, and upload mpi to it. Return NULL on failure.
// If the image is already a vdpau video surface, just return a reference.
struct mp_image *mp_vdpau_upload_video_surface(struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx,
struct mp_image *mpi)
{
struct vdp_functions *vdp = &ctx->vdp;
VdpStatus vdp_st;
if (mpi->imgfmt == IMGFMT_VDPAU || mpi->imgfmt == IMGFMT_VDPAU_OUTPUT)
return mp_image_new_ref(mpi);
VdpChromaType chroma = (VdpChromaType)-1;
VdpYCbCrFormat ycbcr = (VdpYCbCrFormat)-1;
VdpRGBAFormat rgbafmt = (VdpRGBAFormat)-1;
bool rgb = !mp_vdpau_get_format(mpi->imgfmt, &chroma, &ycbcr);
if (rgb && !mp_vdpau_get_rgb_format(mpi->imgfmt, &rgbafmt))
return NULL;
struct mp_image *hwmpi =
mp_vdpau_get_surface(ctx, chroma, rgbafmt, rgb, mpi->w, mpi->h);
if (!hwmpi)
return NULL;
struct mp_image *src = mpi;
if (mpi->stride[0] < 0)
src = mp_image_new_copy(mpi); // unflips it when copying
if (hwmpi->imgfmt == IMGFMT_VDPAU) {
VdpVideoSurface surface = (intptr_t)hwmpi->planes[3];
const void *destdata[3] = {src->planes[0], src->planes[2], src->planes[1]};
if (src->imgfmt == IMGFMT_NV12)
destdata[1] = destdata[2];
vdp_st = vdp->video_surface_put_bits_y_cb_cr(surface,
ycbcr, destdata, src->stride);
} else {
VdpOutputSurface rgb_surface = (intptr_t)hwmpi->planes[3];
vdp_st = vdp->output_surface_put_bits_native(rgb_surface,
&(const void *){src->planes[0]},
&(uint32_t){src->stride[0]},
NULL);
}
CHECK_VDP_WARNING(ctx, "Error when uploading surface");
if (src != mpi)
talloc_free(src);
mp_image_copy_attributes(hwmpi, mpi);
return hwmpi;
}
bool mp_vdpau_guess_if_emulated(struct mp_vdpau_ctx *ctx)
{
struct vdp_functions *vdp = &ctx->vdp;
VdpStatus vdp_st;
char const* info = NULL;
vdp_st = vdp->get_information_string(&info);
CHECK_VDP_WARNING(ctx, "Error when calling vdp_get_information_string");
return vdp_st == VDP_STATUS_OK && info && strstr(info, "VAAPI");
}