mpv/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE

Read this before you submit this pull request:
https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/blob/master/DOCS/contribute.md

Reading this link and following the rules will get your pull request reviewed
and merged faster. Nobody wants lazy pull requests.
github: try to get contributors to read contribute.md How hard can it be? I know contribute.md is a shitty wall of text, but that doesn't make it less important, and each violation will make it take longer by adding another review round anyway. And we really don't need lazy pull requests. If you can't be assed to follow a few simple rules, your code is probably shit or you wanted to be quick and lazy. Why should we accept it? We're the ones who have to maintain it and fix bugs in it, and if the contributor is lazy, the chance of you maintaining it is probably slim as well. On the other hand, WE the maintainers are not obligated to anything. Don't say that though, the first contact doesn't need to be negative. I don't know if the "lazy pull requests" is still too strong, but I can't tell. 2019-10-01 19:44:57 +00:00			`Read this before you submit this pull request:`
			`https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/blob/master/DOCS/contribute.md`
Add github issue and pull request templates I do not understand why github requires adding this crap to source code repositories themselves, instead of making them part of the repository configuration. Remove CONTRIBUTING.md to compensate for github crap accumulating. 2016-06-17 14:16:03 +00:00
github: try to get contributors to read contribute.md How hard can it be? I know contribute.md is a shitty wall of text, but that doesn't make it less important, and each violation will make it take longer by adding another review round anyway. And we really don't need lazy pull requests. If you can't be assed to follow a few simple rules, your code is probably shit or you wanted to be quick and lazy. Why should we accept it? We're the ones who have to maintain it and fix bugs in it, and if the contributor is lazy, the chance of you maintaining it is probably slim as well. On the other hand, WE the maintainers are not obligated to anything. Don't say that though, the first contact doesn't need to be negative. I don't know if the "lazy pull requests" is still too strong, but I can't tell. 2019-10-01 19:44:57 +00:00			`Reading this link and following the rules will get your pull request reviewed`
github: add newline at end of file of pull request template 2024-10-21 20:55:11 +00:00			`and merged faster. Nobody wants lazy pull requests.`