mirror of
https://github.com/schoebel/mars
synced 2025-03-11 07:47:41 +00:00
doc: smaller updates
This commit is contained in:
parent
e2308c8973
commit
581b960260
@ -41802,11 +41802,11 @@ status open
|
||||
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
|
||||
Fortunately,
|
||||
There are some
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
|
||||
ideas
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
there is a method for
|
||||
for
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
dynamic
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
@ -41825,6 +41825,7 @@ dynamically dependent
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
on further external factors, like current customer demands, or forecasts,
|
||||
etc.
|
||||
Please evaluate them carefully before going into mass production.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
@ -42692,7 +42693,7 @@ internal
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
system
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
architecure layer / network level, there exists no redundant disk at all.
|
||||
architecture layer / network level, there exists no redundant disk at all.
|
||||
Only the application cluster is built redundantly.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
@ -42848,9 +42849,9 @@ In general, clustermanagers must fit to the model.
|
||||
status open
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
||||
Some people don't know, or they don't believe even when told them, that
|
||||
different architectural models like shared-disk or shared-nothing will
|
||||
|
||||
Some people don't seem to know, or they seemingly don't believe even when
|
||||
told, that different architectural models like shared-disk or shared-nothing
|
||||
will
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
require
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
@ -42878,7 +42879,7 @@ hazardous
|
||||
|
||||
Pitfall: suchalike problems are typically appearing
|
||||
\series bold
|
||||
only during incidents
|
||||
only during / after incidents
|
||||
\series default
|
||||
.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
@ -42900,7 +42901,7 @@ stable ordinary operation
|
||||
\begin_inset Quotes erd
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
|
||||
that the system is reliable.
|
||||
that a system is reliable.
|
||||
The real
|
||||
\series bold
|
||||
risk
|
||||
@ -42913,7 +42914,8 @@ data inconsistencies
|
||||
\series bold
|
||||
wrong moment
|
||||
\series default
|
||||
, when the clustermanager has to execute the right actions for compensation
|
||||
, e.g.
|
||||
when the clustermanager has to execute the right actions for compensation
|
||||
of a certain component failure.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
@ -43006,7 +43008,22 @@ extremely
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Standard
|
||||
Both reasons are valid and must be automatically
|
||||
Both reasons are valid and should
|
||||
\begin_inset Foot
|
||||
status open
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
||||
Automatics should be preferred, but there are exceptional cases.
|
||||
For example, certain scenarios of hardware defects may require
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
manual switchoff
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
of some (parts of) automatics.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
|
||||
be automatically
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
handled
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
@ -43141,6 +43158,32 @@ automatic mode
|
||||
(except when you start to hack the code and/or write new plugins; then
|
||||
you might notice that there is no sufficient architectural layering / sufficien
|
||||
t separation between mechanism and strategy).
|
||||
Even when such a switch is present and is triggerd by somebody (whether
|
||||
this is good or bad), this does
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
not
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
imply that network outages cannot ocurr (e.g.
|
||||
concurrently by accident), and/or that it will work under any
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
unpredictable
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
incident / disaster scenario and/or its variants like
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
partial failures
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
/ rolling disasters / etc (c.f.
|
||||
section
|
||||
\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
||||
LatexCommand nameref
|
||||
reference "sec:What-is-Geo-Redundancy"
|
||||
plural "false"
|
||||
caps "false"
|
||||
noprefix "false"
|
||||
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
|
||||
)
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Standard
|
||||
@ -43165,7 +43208,8 @@ triggering
|
||||
\series bold
|
||||
considerable risk
|
||||
\series default
|
||||
when automatics do a wrong decision at hundreds of instances in parallel.
|
||||
when automatics do a bad or even wrong decision at hundreds of instances
|
||||
in parallel.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
@ -43221,6 +43265,11 @@ also
|
||||
Otherwise, some chaos is likely to happen.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Standard
|
||||
This is not enough: the CAP theorem and its sisters will also apply.
|
||||
Avoid SPOF = Single Points of Failure also at higher layers.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Standard
|
||||
Here is what you probably will
|
||||
\series bold
|
||||
@ -43340,12 +43389,13 @@ Minimum requirements for larger installations
|
||||
\series bold
|
||||
architectural software layers
|
||||
\series default
|
||||
is not only a blatant ignoration of well-established best practices of
|
||||
should be viewed as ignoration of well-established best practices from
|
||||
|
||||
\series bold
|
||||
software engineering
|
||||
\series default
|
||||
, but will bind you even more firmly to an
|
||||
.
|
||||
It will likely bind you to an
|
||||
\series bold
|
||||
inflexible system
|
||||
\series default
|
||||
@ -43593,7 +43643,7 @@ Typical contemporary STONITH implementations are using IPMI and relatives
|
||||
always
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
create a certain type of damage: the affected systems will definitely not
|
||||
be available, at least for some time until it has (manually) rebooted.
|
||||
be available, at least for some time until they have (manually) rebooted.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
@ -45317,6 +45367,122 @@ mandatory
|
||||
.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Itemize
|
||||
When considering algorithms like
|
||||
\series bold
|
||||
leader election
|
||||
\series default
|
||||
or
|
||||
\series bold
|
||||
master selection
|
||||
\series default
|
||||
or similar, or even highly sophisticated ones like
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
consensus on state machine replication
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_inset Foot
|
||||
status open
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
||||
Some families of protocols like PAXOS (see
|
||||
\begin_inset Flex URL
|
||||
status open
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
||||
|
||||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paxos_(computer_science)
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
|
||||
) are currently hyped.
|
||||
Certainly, suchalike agreement algorithms and their promises
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
look
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
appealing for humans.
|
||||
Practical replication of masses of so-called
|
||||
\begin_inset Quotes eld
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
|
||||
machines
|
||||
\begin_inset Quotes erd
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
|
||||
over long distances is not as easy as laymen in Theoretical Computer Science
|
||||
may conclude, e.g.
|
||||
from a
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
variety
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
of
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
misunderstandings
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
of terms and descriptions.
|
||||
This guide is on
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
geo-redundancy
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
of
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
datacenters
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
(cf section
|
||||
\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
||||
LatexCommand nameref
|
||||
reference "sec:What-is-Geo-Redundancy"
|
||||
plural "false"
|
||||
caps "false"
|
||||
noprefix "false"
|
||||
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
|
||||
), and this does
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
not
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
imply that the runtime state of VMs & co needs to be replicated.
|
||||
Discussions are outside the scope of this guide.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
|
||||
, please think twice.
|
||||
The CAP theorem will hold at
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
any
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
layer, and may produce
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
different
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
results at
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
each
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
of the layers.
|
||||
Chaos may occur.
|
||||
For example, independent split brain may occur at the layer of so-called
|
||||
|
||||
\emph on
|
||||
orchestrations
|
||||
\emph default
|
||||
, and at different points in time.
|
||||
\begin_inset Newline newline
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
|
||||
Example of an analogy: when a big classical orchestra is forcefully split
|
||||
into multiple sub-orchestras by some unexpected external force during their
|
||||
performance, the surviving players will not improve their music, in particular
|
||||
when they cannot hear each other anymore.
|
||||
Having a common conductor will also not help if he/she breaks down, or
|
||||
cannot be seen anymore by some of the surviving players, or when suddenly
|
||||
two independent conductors are entering the scene, e.g.
|
||||
because each of them believes that the other one would be already dead.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Chapter
|
||||
Advice for Managers and Architects
|
||||
\begin_inset CommandInset label
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user