libabigail/doc/manuals/libabigail-concepts.rst
Dodji Seketeli a8b00c0892 Update the manual for the suppression specification initial work
* doc/manuals/abidiff.rst: Add documentation for the new
	--suppressions command line switch.
	(--harmless, --harmful): Refer to the new "concepts" section
	below, where harmful/harmless concepts are now explained.
	(Notes): Move the content of the notes section where
	harmful/harmless concepts were explained, to the newly created
	'Concepts' section.
	* doc/manuals/index.rst: Limit the depth of the table of content
	to 2.  Add the new libabigail-concepts.rst stuff in here.  Adjust
	for the renaming of tools.rst to libabigail-tools.rst.
	* doc/manuals/libabigail-concepts.rst: New file.

Signed-off-by: Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>
2014-10-15 22:32:56 +02:00

286 lines
9.0 KiB
ReStructuredText

#########
Concepts
#########
.. _abi_artifacts_label:
ABI artifacts
=============
An ABI artifact is a relevant part of the ABI of a shared library or
program. Examples of ABI artifacts are exported types, variables,
functions, or `ELF`_ symbols exported by a shared library.
.. _harmfulchangeconcept_label:
Harmful changes
===============
A change in the diff report is considered harmful if it might cause
ABI compatibility issues. That is, it might prevent an application
dynamically linked against a given version of a library to keep
working with the changed subsequent versions of the same library.
.. _harmlesschangeconcept_label:
Harmless changes
================
A change in the diff report is considered harmless if it will not
cause any ABI compatibility issue. That is, it will not prevent an
application dynamically linked against given version of a library to
keep working with the changed subsequent versions of the same library.
By default, ``abidiff`` filters harmless changes from the diff report.
.. _suppr_spec_label:
Suppression specifications
==========================
* Definition
A suppression specification file is a way for a user to instruct
:ref:`abidiff <abidiff_label>` to avoid emitting reports for changes
involving certain :ref:`ABI artifacts<abi_artifacts_label>`.
It contains directives (or specifications) that describe the set of
ABI artifacts to avoid emitting change reports about.
* Introductory examples
Its syntax is based on a simplified form of `Ini File Syntax`_. For
instance, specify that change reports on a type named FooPrivateType
should be suppressed, one could write this suppression specification:
::
[suppress_type]
name = FooPrivateType
Maybe we want to ensure that only a change reports about structures
named FooPrivateType should be suppressed, one could write: ::
[suppress_type]
type_kind = struct
name = FooPrivateType
But we could also want to suppress change reports avoid typedefs named
FooPrivateType. In that case we would write: ::
[suppress_type]
type_kind = typedef
name = FooPrivateType
Or, we could want to suppress change reports about all struct which
names ends with PrivateType: ::
[suppress_type]
type_kind = struct
name = ^.*PrivateType
Let's now look at the generic syntax of suppression specification
files.
* Syntax
* Properties
More generally, the format of suppression lists is organized
around the concept of `property`. Every property has a name and
a value, delimited by the ``=`` sign. E.g: ::
name = value
Leading and trailing white spaces are ignored around property
name and values.
* Sections
Properties are then grouped into arbitrarily named sections that
shall not be nested. The name of the section is on a line by
itself and is surrounded by square brackets, i.e: ::
[section_name]
property1_name = property1_value
property2_name = property2_value
A section might or might not have properties. Sections that
expect having properties and which are found nonetheless empty
are just ignored. Properties that are not recognized by the
reader are ignored as well.
* Section names
* ``[suppress_type]``
Suppresses report messages about a type change. The potential
properties of this sections are:
* ``name_regexp`` ``=`` <regular-expression>
Suppresses change reports involving types whose name
matches the regular expression specified as value of this
property.
* ``name`` ``=`` <a-value>
Suppresses change reports involving types whose name
equals the value of this property.
* ``type_kind`` ``=`` ``class`` | ``struct`` | ``union`` |
``enum`` | ``array`` | ``typedef`` | ``builtin``
Suppresses change reports involving a certain kind of
type. The kind of type to suppress change reports for is
specified by the possible values listed above:
- ``class``: suppress change reports for class types.
Note that even if class types don't exist for C, this
value still triggers the suppression of change reports
for struct types, in C. In C++ however, it should do
what it suggests.
- ``struct``: suppress change reports for struct types
in C or C++. Note that the value ``class`` above is a
super-set of this one.
- ``union``: suppress change reports for union types.
- ``enum``: suppress change reports for enum types.
- ``array``: suppress change reports for array types.
- ``typedef``: suppress change reports for typedef types.
- ``builtin``: suppress change reports for built-in (or
native) types. Example of built-in types are char,
int, unsigned int, etc.
* ``label`` ``=`` <some-value>
Define a label for the section. A label is just an
informative string that might be used by abidiff to refer
to a type suppression in error messages.
* Comments
``;`` or ``#`` ASCII character at the beginning of a line
indicates a comment. Comment lines are ignored.
* Code examples
Suppose we have a library named ``libtest1-v0.so`` which contains this
very useful code: ::
$ cat -n test1-v0.cc
1 // A forward declaration for a type considered to be opaque to
2 // function foo() below.
3 struct opaque_type;
4
5 // This function cannot touch any member of opaque_type. Hence,
6 // changes to members of opaque_type should not impact foo, as far as
7 // ABI is concerned.
8 void
9 foo(opaque_type*)
10 {
11 }
12
13 struct opaque_type
14 {
15 int member0;
16 char member1;
17 };
$
Let's change the layout of struct opaque_type by inserting a data
member around line 15, leading to a new version of the library,
that we shall name ``libtest1-v1.so``: ::
$ cat -n test1-v1.cc
1 // A forward declaration for a type considered to be opaque to
2 // function foo() below.
3 struct opaque_type;
4
5 // This function cannot touch any member of opaque_type; Hence,
6 // changes to members of opaque_type should not impact foo, as far as
7 // ABI is concerned.
8 void
9 foo(opaque_type*)
10 {
11 }
12
13 struct opaque_type
14 {
15 char added_member; // <-- a new member got added here now.
16 int member0;
17 char member1;
18 };
$
Let's compile both examples. We shall not forget to compile them
with debug information generation turned on: ::
$ g++ -shared -g -Wall -o libtest1-v0.so test1-v0.cc
$ g++ -shared -g -Wall -o libtest1-v1.so test1-v1.cc
Let's ask :ref:`abidiff <abidiff_label>` which ABI differences it sees
between ``libtest1-v0.so`` and ``libtest1-v1.so``: ::
$ abidiff libtest1-v0.so libtest1-v1.so
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 1 Changed, 0 Added function
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
1 function with some indirect sub-type change:
[C]'function void foo(opaque_type*)' has some indirect sub-type changes:
parameter 0 of type 'opaque_type*' has sub-type changes:
in pointed to type 'struct opaque_type':
size changed from 64 to 96 bits
1 data member insertion:
'char opaque_type::added_member', at offset 0 (in bits)
2 data member changes:
'int opaque_type::member0' offset changed from 0 to 32
'char opaque_type::member1' offset changed from 32 to 64
So ``abidiff`` reports that the opaque_type's layout has changed
in a significant way, as far as ABI implications are concerned, in
theory. After all, a sub-type (``struct opaque_type``) of an
exported function (``foo()``) has seen its layout change. This
might have non negligible ABI implications. But in practice here,
the programmer of the litest1-v1.so library knows that the "soft"
contract between the function ``foo()`` and the type ``struct
opaque_type`` is to stay away from the data members of the type.
So layout changes of ``struct opaque_type`` should not impact
``foo()``.
Now to teach ``abidiff`` about this soft contract and have it
avoid emitting what amounts to false positives in this case, we
write the suppression specification file below: ::
$ cat test1.suppr
[suppress_type]
type_kind = struct
name = opaque_type
Translated in plain English, this suppression specification would
read: "Do not emit change reports about a struct which name is
opaque_type".
Let's now invoke ``abidiff`` on the two versions of the library
again, but this time with the suppression specification: ::
$ abidiff --suppressions test1.suppr libtest1-v0.so libtest1-v1.so
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed (1 filtered out), 0 Added function
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
As you can see, ``abidiff`` does not report the change anymore; it
tells us that it was filtered out instead.
.. _ELF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executable_and_Linkable_Format
.. _Ini File Syntax: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INI_file