On RHEL I'm seeing issues with putting the core module in the "extra"
path. On the next depmod run, it gets added to modules.dep, and on a
subsequent kpatch install I see the following errors:
/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/50drm/module-setup.sh: line 26: /lib/modules/3.10.0-123.4.4.el7.x86_64//weak-updates/kpatch/kpatch.ko: No such file or directory
/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/90kernel-modules/module-setup.sh: line 14: /lib/modules/3.10.0-123.4.4.el7.x86_64//weak-updates/kpatch/kpatch.ko: No such file or directory
modinfo: ERROR: Module /lib/modules/3.10.0-123.4.4.el7.x86_64/weak-updates/kpatch/kpatch.ko not found.
Until the core module gets merged into Linux, I think we can put it in
/usr/lib/kpatch, which is also where the patch modules are going to be
delivered in the RHEL RPM.
Making sure the other options still work with the kpatch utility for
now, so as to keep backwards compatibility between a newer kpatch
utility and older core modules. We can break this compatibility for
kpatch 0.2.0.
When CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is enabled, loading of the patch module fails
with "no symbol version for kpatch_register". When building the patch
module, we need to point it to the core module's Module.symvers file.
This also works when CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is disabled, since
Module.symvers is created regardless.
Build and install the kpatch core module with make and make install,
rather than building it every time with kpatch build.
The only downside to this approach is that the user has to make and make
install kpatch every time they get a new kernel. But this is only
temporary, until the kpatch module is delivered in an RPM.
- setup the makefiles to support "make" and "make install", which builds
the kpatch-build tools and installs everything in /usr/local.
- update kpatch-build to support new paths
- add "kpatch build" wrapper around kpatch-build
Josh Poimboeuf
Seth Jennings