Commit 04f5fe87d3 introduced an rwlock in the pools to deal with the risk
that pool_flush() dereferences an area being freed, and commit 899fb8abdc
turned it into a spinlock. The pools already contain a spinlock in case of
locked pools, so let's use the same and simplify the code by removing ifdefs.
At this point I'm really suspecting that if pool_flush() would instead
rely on __pool_get_first() to pick entries from the pool, the concurrency
problem could never happen since only one user would get a given entry at
once, thus it could not be freed by another user. It's not certain this
would be faster however because of the number of atomic ops to retrieve
one entry compared to a locked batch.
21072b9480