mirror of
http://git.haproxy.org/git/haproxy.git/
synced 2024-12-14 23:44:41 +00:00
64bc40b654
This one is used to call getaddrinfo() to resolve IPv6 host names.
304 lines
14 KiB
Plaintext
304 lines
14 KiB
Plaintext
----------------------
|
|
HAProxy how-to
|
|
----------------------
|
|
version 1.4
|
|
willy tarreau
|
|
2010/05/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) How to build it
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
To build haproxy, you will need :
|
|
- GNU make. Neither Solaris nor OpenBSD's make work with the GNU Makefile.
|
|
However, specific Makefiles for BSD and OSX are provided.
|
|
- GCC between 2.91 and 4.5.0. Others may work, but not tested.
|
|
- GNU ld
|
|
|
|
Also, you might want to build with libpcre support, which will provide a very
|
|
efficient regex implementation and will also fix some badness on Solaris' one.
|
|
|
|
To build haproxy, you have to choose your target OS amongst the following ones
|
|
and assign it to the TARGET variable :
|
|
|
|
- linux22 for Linux 2.2
|
|
- linux24 for Linux 2.4 and above (default)
|
|
- linux24e for Linux 2.4 with support for a working epoll (> 0.21)
|
|
- linux26 for Linux 2.6 and above
|
|
- solaris for Solaris 8 or 10 (others untested)
|
|
- freebsd for FreeBSD 5 to 8.0 (others untested)
|
|
- openbsd for OpenBSD 3.1 to 4.6 (others untested)
|
|
- cygwin for Cygwin
|
|
- generic for any other OS.
|
|
- custom to manually adjust every setting
|
|
|
|
You may also choose your CPU to benefit from some optimizations. This is
|
|
particularly important on UltraSparc machines. For this, you can assign
|
|
one of the following choices to the CPU variable :
|
|
|
|
- i686 for intel PentiumPro, Pentium 2 and above, AMD Athlon
|
|
- i586 for intel Pentium, AMD K6, VIA C3.
|
|
- ultrasparc : Sun UltraSparc I/II/III/IV processor
|
|
- native : use the build machine's specific processor optimizations
|
|
- generic : any other processor or no specific optimization. (default)
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you may just set the CPU_CFLAGS value to the optimal GCC options
|
|
for your platform.
|
|
|
|
You may want to build specific target binaries which do not match your native
|
|
compiler's target. This is particularly true on 64-bit systems when you want
|
|
to build a 32-bit binary. Use the ARCH variable for this purpose. Right now
|
|
it only knows about a few x86 variants (i386,i486,i586,i686,x86_64), two
|
|
generic ones (32,64) and sets -m32/-m64 as well as -march=<arch> accordingly.
|
|
|
|
If your system supports PCRE (Perl Compatible Regular Expressions), then you
|
|
really should build with libpcre which is between 2 and 10 times faster than
|
|
other libc implementations. Regex are used for header processing (deletion,
|
|
rewriting, allow, deny). The only inconvenient of libpcre is that it is not
|
|
yet widely spread, so if you build for other systems, you might get into
|
|
trouble if they don't have the dynamic library. In this situation, you should
|
|
statically link libpcre into haproxy so that it will not be necessary to
|
|
install it on target systems. Available build options for PCRE are :
|
|
|
|
- USE_PCRE=1 to use libpcre, in whatever form is available on your system
|
|
(shared or static)
|
|
|
|
- USE_STATIC_PCRE=1 to use a static version of libpcre even if the dynamic
|
|
one is available. This will enhance portability.
|
|
|
|
- with no option, use your OS libc's standard regex implemntation (default).
|
|
Warning! group references on Solaris seem broken. Use static-pcre whenever
|
|
possible.
|
|
|
|
Recent systems can resolve IPv6 host names using getaddrinfo(). This primitive
|
|
is not present in all libcs and does not work in all of them either. Support in
|
|
glibc was broken before 2.3. Some embedded libs may not properly work either,
|
|
thus, support is disabled by default, meaning that some host names which only
|
|
resolve as IPv6 addresses will not resolve and configs might emit an error
|
|
during parsing. If you know that your OS libc has reliable support for
|
|
getaddrinfo(), you can add USE_GETADDRINFO=1 on the make command line to enable
|
|
it. This is the recommended option for most Linux distro packagers since it's
|
|
working fine on all recent mainstream distros. It is automatically enabled on
|
|
Solaris 8 and above, as it's known to work.
|
|
|
|
By default, the DEBUG variable is set to '-g' to enable debug symbols. It is
|
|
not wise to disable it on uncommon systems, because it's often the only way to
|
|
get a complete core when you need one. Otherwise, you can set DEBUG to '-s' to
|
|
strip the binary.
|
|
|
|
For example, I use this to build for Solaris 8 :
|
|
|
|
$ make TARGET=solaris CPU=ultrasparc USE_STATIC_PCRE=1
|
|
|
|
And I build it this way on OpenBSD or FreeBSD :
|
|
|
|
$ make -f Makefile.bsd REGEX=pcre DEBUG= COPTS.generic="-Os -fomit-frame-pointer -mgnu"
|
|
|
|
In order to build a 32-bit binary on an x86_64 Linux system :
|
|
|
|
$ make TARGET=linux26 ARCH=i386
|
|
|
|
If you need to pass other defines, includes, libraries, etc... then please
|
|
check the Makefile to see which ones will be available in your case, and
|
|
use the USE_* variables in the GNU Makefile, or ADDINC, ADDLIB, and DEFINE
|
|
variables in the BSD makefiles.
|
|
|
|
AIX 5.3 is known to work with the generic target. However, for the binary to
|
|
also run on 5.2 or earlier, you need to build with DEFINE="-D_MSGQSUPPORT",
|
|
otherwise __fd_select() will be used while not being present in the libc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) How to install it
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
To install haproxy, you can either copy the single resulting binary to the
|
|
place you want, or run :
|
|
|
|
$ sudo make install
|
|
|
|
If you're packaging it for another system, you can specify its root directory
|
|
in the usual DESTDIR variable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) How to set it up
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
There is some documentation in the doc/ directory :
|
|
|
|
- architecture.txt : this is the architecture manual. It is quite old and
|
|
does not tell about the nice new features, but it's still a good starting
|
|
point when you know what you want but don't know how to do it.
|
|
|
|
- configuration.txt : this is the configuration manual. It recalls a few
|
|
essential HTTP basic concepts, and details all the configuration file
|
|
syntax (keywords, units). It also describes the log and stats format. It
|
|
is normally always up to date. If you see that something is missing from
|
|
it, please report it as this is a bug.
|
|
|
|
- haproxy-en.txt / haproxy-fr.txt : these are the old outdated docs. You
|
|
should never need them. If you do, then please report what you didn't
|
|
find in the other ones.
|
|
|
|
- gpl.txt / lgpl.txt : the copy of the licenses covering the software. See
|
|
the 'LICENSE' file at the top for more information.
|
|
|
|
- the rest is mainly for developers.
|
|
|
|
There are also a number of nice configuration examples in the "examples"
|
|
directory as well as on several sites and articles on the net which are linked
|
|
to from the haproxy web site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4) How to report a bug
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
It is possible that from time to time you'll find a bug. A bug is a case where
|
|
what you see is not what is documented. Otherwise it can be a misdesign. If you
|
|
find that something is stupidly design, please discuss it on the list (see the
|
|
"how to contribute" section below). If you feel like you're proceeding right
|
|
and haproxy doesn't obey, then first ask yourself if it is possible that nobody
|
|
before you has even encountered this issue. If it's unlikely, the you probably
|
|
have an issue in your setup. Just in case of doubt, please consult the mailing
|
|
list archives :
|
|
|
|
http://www.formilux.org/archives/haproxy/
|
|
http://marc.info/?l=haproxy
|
|
|
|
Otherwise, please try to gather the maximum amount of information to help
|
|
reproduce the issue and send that to the mailing list :
|
|
|
|
haproxy@formilux.org
|
|
|
|
Please include your configuration and logs. You can mask your IP addresses and
|
|
passwords, we don't need them. But it's essential that you post your config if
|
|
you want people to guess what is happening.
|
|
|
|
Also, keep in mind that haproxy is designed to NEVER CRASH. If you see it die
|
|
without any reason, then it definitely is a critical bug that must be reported
|
|
and urgently fixed. It has happened a couple of times in the past, essentially
|
|
on development versions running on new architectures. If you think your setup
|
|
is fairly common, then it is possible that the issue is totally unrelated.
|
|
Anyway, if that happens, feel free to contact me directly, as I will give you
|
|
instructions on how to collect a usable core file, and will probably ask for
|
|
other captures that you'll not want to share with the list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5) How to contribute
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
It is possible that you'll want to add a specific feature to satisfy your needs
|
|
or one of your customers'. Contributions are welcome, however I'm often very
|
|
picky about changes. I will generally reject patches that change massive parts
|
|
of the code, or that touch the core parts without any good reason if those
|
|
changes have not been discussed first.
|
|
|
|
The proper place to discuss your changes is the HAProxy Mailing List. There are
|
|
enough skilled readers to catch hazardous mistakes and to suggest improvements.
|
|
You can subscribe to it by sending an empty e-mail at the following address :
|
|
|
|
haproxy+subscribe@formilux.org
|
|
|
|
If your work is very confidential and you can't publicly discuss it, you can
|
|
also mail me directly about it, but your mail may be waiting several days in
|
|
the queue before you get a response.
|
|
|
|
If you'd like a feature to be added but you think you don't have the skills to
|
|
implement it yourself, you should follow these steps :
|
|
|
|
1. discuss the feature on the mailing list. It is possible that someone
|
|
else has already implemented it, or that someone will tell you how to
|
|
proceed without it, or even why not to do it. It is also possible that
|
|
in fact it's quite easy to implement and people will guide you through
|
|
the process. That way you'll finally have YOUR patch merged, providing
|
|
the feature YOU need.
|
|
|
|
2. if you really can't code it yourself after discussing it, then you may
|
|
consider contacting someone to do the job for you. Some people on the
|
|
list might be OK with trying to do it. Otherwise, you can check the list
|
|
of contributors at the URL below, some of the regular contributors may
|
|
be able to do the work, probably not for free but their time is as much
|
|
valuable as yours after all, you can't eat the cake and have it too.
|
|
|
|
The list of past and regular contributors is available below. It lists not only
|
|
significant code contributions (features, fixes), but also time or money
|
|
donations :
|
|
|
|
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/contrib.html
|
|
|
|
Note to contributors: it's very handy when patches comes with a properly
|
|
formated subject. Try to put one of the following words between brackets
|
|
to indicate the importance of the patch followed if possible by a single
|
|
word indicating what subsystem is affected, then by a short description :
|
|
|
|
[BUG] fix for a minor or medium-level bug. When a few of these ones are
|
|
available, a new maintenance release is emitted.
|
|
|
|
[CRITICAL] medium-term reliability or security is at risk, an upgrade is
|
|
absolutely required. A maintenance release may be emitted even if
|
|
only one of these bugs are fixed.
|
|
|
|
[CLEANUP] code cleanup, silence of warnings, etc... theorically no impact.
|
|
These patches will rarely be seen in stable branches, though they
|
|
may appear when they remove some annoyance.
|
|
|
|
[MINOR] minor change, very low risk of impact. It is often the case for
|
|
code additions that don't touch live code.
|
|
|
|
[MEDIUM] medium risk, may cause unexpected regressions of low importance or
|
|
which may quickly be discovered.
|
|
|
|
[MAJOR] major risk of hidden regression. This happens when I rearrange
|
|
large parts of code, when I play with timeouts, with variable
|
|
initializations, etc... We should only exceptionally find such
|
|
patches in stable branches.
|
|
|
|
[OPTIM] some code was optimised. Sometimes if the regression risk is very
|
|
low and the gains significant, such patches may be merged in the
|
|
stable branch.
|
|
|
|
[DOC] documentation updates or fixes only. No code is affected, no need
|
|
to upgrade. These patches can also be sent right after a new
|
|
feature, to document it.
|
|
|
|
[TESTS] added regression testing configuration files or scripts
|
|
|
|
[BUILD] fix build issues. If you could build, no upgrade required.
|
|
|
|
[LICENSE] licensing updates (may impact distro packagers)
|
|
|
|
[RELEASE] release a new version (development version or stable version)
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] any other patch which could not be qualified with the tags above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tags are not rigid, and I reserve the right to change them when merging the
|
|
patch. It may happen that a same patch has a different tag in two distinct
|
|
branches. The reason is that a bug in one branch may just be a cleanup in the
|
|
other one because the code cannot be triggered.
|
|
|
|
Examples of messages :
|
|
- [DOC] document options forwardfor to logasap
|
|
- [BUG] stats: connection reset counters must be plain ascii, not HTML
|
|
- [MEDIUM] checks: support multi-packet health check responses
|
|
- [RELEASE] Released version 1.4.2
|
|
|
|
For a more efficient interaction between the mainline code and your code, I can
|
|
only strongly encourage you to try the Git version control system :
|
|
|
|
http://git-scm.com/
|
|
|
|
It's very fast, lightweight and lets you undo/redo your work as often as you
|
|
want, without making your mistakes visible to the rest of the world. It will
|
|
definitely help you contribute quality code and take other people's feedback
|
|
in consideration. In order to clone the HAProxy Git repository :
|
|
|
|
$ git clone http://git.1wt.eu/git/haproxy-1.4.git (stable 1.4)
|
|
$ git clone http://git.1wt.eu/git/haproxy.git/ (development)
|
|
|
|
If you decide to use Git for your developments, then your commit messages will
|
|
have the subject line in the format described above, then the whole description
|
|
of your work (mainly why you did it) will be in the body. You can directly send
|
|
your commits to the mailing list, the format is convenient to read and process.
|
|
|
|
-- end
|