haproxy/dev/haring
Willy Tarreau eb3d5f464d MEDIUM: ring: use the topmost bit of the tail as a lock
We're now locking the tail while looking for some room in the ring. In
fact it's still while writing to it, but the goal definitely is to get
rid of the lock ASAP. For this we reserve the topmost bit of the tail
as a lock, which may have as a possible visible effect that buffers will
be limited to 2GB instead of 4GB on 32-bit machines (though in practise,
good luck for allocating more than 2GB contiguous on 32-bit), but in
practice since the size is read with atol() and some operating systems
limit it to LONG_MAX unless passing negative numbers, the limit is
already there.

For now the impact on x86_64 is significant (drop from 2.35 to 1.4M/s
on 48 threads on EPYC 24 cores) but this situation is only temporary
so that changes can be reviewable and bisectable.

Other approaches were attempted, such as using XCHG instead, which is
slightly faster on x86 with low thread counts (but causes more write
contention), and forces readers to stall under heavy traffic because
they can't access a valid value for the queue anymore. A CAS requires
preloading the value and is les good on ARMv8.1. XADD could also be
considered with 12-13 upper bits of the offset dedicated to locking,
but that looks overkill.
2024-03-25 17:34:19 +00:00
..
haring.c MEDIUM: ring: use the topmost bit of the tail as a lock 2024-03-25 17:34:19 +00:00
README

This needs to be built from the top makefile, for example :

  make dev/haring/haring

If HAProxy is built with special options such -DDEBUG_THREAD or with
multi-threading support enabled (which changes the ring's header size),
it can be worth reusing the same build options for haring, usually they
will remain compatible, and will simplify the handling of different file
layouts, at the expense of dragging more dependencies into the executable.