I found on an (old) AIX 5.1 machine that stdint.h didn't exist while
inttypes.h which is expected to include it does exist and provides the
desired functionalities.
As explained here, stdint being just a subset of inttypes for use in
freestanding environments, it's probably always OK to switch to inttypes
instead:
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009696799/basedefs/stdint.h.html
Also it's even clearer here in the autoconf doc :
https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.61/html_node/Header-Portability.html
"The C99 standard says that inttypes.h includes stdint.h, so there's
no need to include stdint.h separately in a standard environment.
Some implementations have inttypes.h but not stdint.h (e.g., Solaris
7), but we don't know of any implementation that has stdint.h but not
inttypes.h"
It used to be called 'len' during the reorganisation but strictly speaking
it's not a length since it wraps. Also we already use '_data' as the suffix
to count available data, and data is also what we use to indicate the amount
of data in a pipe so let's improve consistency here. It was important to do
this in two operations because data used to be the name of the pointer to
the storage area.
The new file istbuf.h links the indirect strings (ist) with the buffers.
The purpose is to encourage addition of more standard buffer manipulation
functions that rely on this in order to improve the overall ease of use
along all the code. Just like ist.h and buf.h, this new file is not
expected to depend on anything beyond these two files.
A few functions were added and/or converted from buffer.h :
- b_isteq() : indicates if a buffer and a string match
- b_isteat() : consumes a string from the buffer if it matches
- b_istput() : appends a small string to a buffer (all or none)
- b_putist() : appends part of a large string to a buffer
The equivalent functions were removed from buffer.h and changed at the
various call places.
