From f86a106f68531bad6210ff6a272f9c73bd801c06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Olivier Houchard Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:28:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] MINOR: fd: Fix a typo in a coment. The function si called fd_takeover, not fd_takeother. --- src/fd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/fd.c b/src/fd.c index 919e43351..b0a16841e 100644 --- a/src/fd.c +++ b/src/fd.c @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void fd_dodelete(int fd, int do_close) int locked = fdtab[fd].running_mask != tid_bit; /* We're just trying to protect against a concurrent fd_insert() - * here, not against fd_takeother(), because either we're called + * here, not against fd_takeover(), because either we're called * directly from the iocb(), and we're already locked, or we're * called from the mux tasklet, but then the mux is responsible for * making sure the tasklet does nothing, and the connection is never