mirror of
http://git.haproxy.org/git/haproxy.git/
synced 2024-12-23 21:22:17 +00:00
BUG/MINOR: cache: Cache response even if request has "no-cache" directive
Since commit cc9bf2e5f
"MEDIUM: cache: Change caching conditions"
responses that do not have an explicit expiration time are not cached
anymore. But this mechanism wrongly used the TX_CACHE_IGNORE flag
instead of the TX_CACHEABLE one. The effect this had is that a cacheable
response that corresponded to a request having a "Cache-Control:
no-cache" for instance would not be cached.
Contrary to what was said in the other commit message, the "checkcache"
option should not be impacted by the use of the TX_CACHEABLE flag
instead of the TX_CACHE_IGNORE one. The response is indeed considered as
not cacheable if it has no expiration time, regardless of the presence
of a cookie in the response.
This should fix GitHub issue #2048.
This patch can be backported up to branch 2.4.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4c0be6b20
commit
879debeecb
@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
|
||||
/* cacheability management, bits values 0x1000 to 0x3000 (0-3 shift 12) */
|
||||
#define TX_CACHEABLE 0x00001000 /* at least part of the response is cacheable */
|
||||
#define TX_CACHE_COOK 0x00002000 /* a cookie in the response is cacheable */
|
||||
#define TX_CACHE_IGNORE 0x00004000 /* do not retrieve object from cache, or avoid caching response */
|
||||
#define TX_CACHE_IGNORE 0x00004000 /* do not retrieve object from cache */
|
||||
#define TX_CACHE_SHIFT 12 /* bit shift */
|
||||
|
||||
#define TX_CON_WANT_TUN 0x00008000 /* Will be a tunnel (CONNECT or 101-Switching-Protocol) */
|
||||
|
32
reg-tests/cache/caching_rules.vtc
vendored
32
reg-tests/cache/caching_rules.vtc
vendored
@ -67,6 +67,18 @@ server s1 {
|
||||
txresp -hdr "Cache-Control: max-age=500" \
|
||||
-hdr "Age: 100" -bodylen 140
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# "Control-Cache: no-cache" on client request but still stored in cache
|
||||
rxreq
|
||||
expect req.url == "/nocache"
|
||||
txresp -hdr "Cache-Control: max-age=500" \
|
||||
-hdr "Age: 100" -bodylen 140
|
||||
|
||||
rxreq
|
||||
expect req.url == "/nocache"
|
||||
txresp -hdr "Cache-Control: max-age=500" \
|
||||
-hdr "Age: 100" -bodylen 140
|
||||
|
||||
} -start
|
||||
|
||||
server s2 {
|
||||
@ -221,4 +233,24 @@ client c1 -connect ${h1_fe_sock} {
|
||||
expect resp.bodylen == 140
|
||||
expect resp.http.X-Cache-Hit == 1
|
||||
|
||||
# Cache-Control: no-cache
|
||||
txreq -url "/nocache" -hdr "Cache-Control: no-cache"
|
||||
rxresp
|
||||
expect resp.status == 200
|
||||
expect resp.bodylen == 140
|
||||
expect resp.http.X-Cache-Hit == 0
|
||||
|
||||
txreq -url "/nocache" -hdr "Cache-Control: no-cache"
|
||||
rxresp
|
||||
expect resp.status == 200
|
||||
expect resp.bodylen == 140
|
||||
expect resp.http.X-Cache-Hit == 0
|
||||
|
||||
txreq -url "/nocache"
|
||||
rxresp
|
||||
expect resp.status == 200
|
||||
expect resp.bodylen == 140
|
||||
expect resp.http.X-Cache-Hit == 1
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
} -run
|
||||
|
@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ enum act_return http_action_store_cache(struct act_rule *rule, struct proxy *px,
|
||||
|
||||
http_check_response_for_cacheability(s, &s->res);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(txn->flags & TX_CACHEABLE) || !(txn->flags & TX_CACHE_COOK) || (txn->flags & TX_CACHE_IGNORE))
|
||||
if (!(txn->flags & TX_CACHEABLE) || !(txn->flags & TX_CACHE_COOK))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
shctx_lock(shctx);
|
||||
|
@ -3772,7 +3772,7 @@ void http_check_response_for_cacheability(struct stream *s, struct channel *res)
|
||||
/* We won't store an entry that has neither a cache validator nor an
|
||||
* explicit expiration time, as suggested in RFC 7234#3. */
|
||||
if (!has_freshness_info && !has_validator)
|
||||
txn->flags |= TX_CACHE_IGNORE;
|
||||
txn->flags &= ~TX_CACHEABLE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user