BUG/MAJOR: http: reject any empty content-length header value
The content-length header parser has its dedicated function, in order to take extreme care about invalid, unparsable, or conflicting values. But there's a corner case in it, by which it stops comparing values when reaching the end of the header. This has for a side effect that an empty value or a value that ends with a comma does not deserve further analysis, and it acts as if the header was absent. While this is not necessarily a problem for the value ending with a comma as it will be cause a header folding and will disappear, it is a problem for the first isolated empty header because this one will not be recontructed when next ones are seen, and will be passed as-is to the backend server. A vulnerable HTTP/1 server hosted behind haproxy that would just use this first value as "0" and ignore the valid one would then not be protected by haproxy and could be attacked this way, taking the payload for an extra request. In field the risk depends on the server. Most commonly used servers already have safe content-length parsers, but users relying on haproxy to protect a known-vulnerable server might be at risk (and the risk of a bug even in a reputable server should never be dismissed). A configuration-based work-around consists in adding the following rule in the frontend, to explicitly reject requests featuring an empty content-length header that would have not be folded into an existing one: http-request deny if { hdr_len(content-length) 0 } The real fix consists in adjusting the parser so that it always expects a value at the beginning of the header or after a comma. It will now reject requests and responses having empty values anywhere in the C-L header. This needs to be backported to all supported versions. Note that the modification was made to functions h1_parse_cont_len_header() and http_parse_cont_len_header(). Prior to 2.8 the latter was in h2_parse_cont_len_header(). One day the two should be refused but the former is also used by Lua. The HTTP messaging reg-tests were completed to test these cases. Thanks to Ben Kallus of Dartmouth College and Narf Industries for reporting this! (this is in GH #2237).
This commit is contained in:
parent
7ab4949ef1
commit
6492f1f29d
|
@ -273,3 +273,29 @@ client c3h1 -connect ${h1_feh1_sock} {
|
|||
# arrive here.
|
||||
expect_close
|
||||
} -run
|
||||
|
||||
client c4h1 -connect ${h1_feh1_sock} {
|
||||
# this request is invalid and advertises an invalid C-L ending with an
|
||||
# empty value, which results in a stream error.
|
||||
txreq \
|
||||
-req "GET" \
|
||||
-url "/test31.html" \
|
||||
-hdr "content-length: 0," \
|
||||
-hdr "connection: close"
|
||||
rxresp
|
||||
expect resp.status == 400
|
||||
expect_close
|
||||
} -run
|
||||
|
||||
client c5h1 -connect ${h1_feh1_sock} {
|
||||
# this request is invalid and advertises an empty C-L, which results
|
||||
# in a stream error.
|
||||
txreq \
|
||||
-req "GET" \
|
||||
-url "/test41.html" \
|
||||
-hdr "content-length:" \
|
||||
-hdr "connection: close"
|
||||
rxresp
|
||||
expect resp.status == 400
|
||||
expect_close
|
||||
} -run
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ barrier b1 cond 2 -cyclic
|
|||
barrier b2 cond 2 -cyclic
|
||||
barrier b3 cond 2 -cyclic
|
||||
barrier b4 cond 2 -cyclic
|
||||
barrier b5 cond 2 -cyclic
|
||||
barrier b6 cond 2 -cyclic
|
||||
|
||||
server s1 {
|
||||
rxreq
|
||||
|
@ -30,6 +32,12 @@ server s1 {
|
|||
|
||||
barrier b4 sync
|
||||
# the next request is never received
|
||||
|
||||
barrier b5 sync
|
||||
# the next request is never received
|
||||
|
||||
barrier b6 sync
|
||||
# the next request is never received
|
||||
} -repeat 2 -start
|
||||
|
||||
haproxy h1 -conf {
|
||||
|
@ -119,6 +127,32 @@ client c1h2 -connect ${h1_feh2_sock} {
|
|||
txdata -data "this is sent and ignored"
|
||||
rxrst
|
||||
} -run
|
||||
|
||||
# fifth request is invalid and advertises an invalid C-L ending with an
|
||||
# empty value, which results in a stream error.
|
||||
stream 9 {
|
||||
barrier b5 sync
|
||||
txreq \
|
||||
-req "GET" \
|
||||
-scheme "https" \
|
||||
-url "/test5.html" \
|
||||
-hdr "content-length" "0," \
|
||||
-nostrend
|
||||
rxrst
|
||||
} -run
|
||||
|
||||
# sixth request is invalid and advertises an empty C-L, which results
|
||||
# in a stream error.
|
||||
stream 11 {
|
||||
barrier b6 sync
|
||||
txreq \
|
||||
-req "GET" \
|
||||
-scheme "https" \
|
||||
-url "/test6.html" \
|
||||
-hdr "content-length" "" \
|
||||
-nostrend
|
||||
rxrst
|
||||
} -run
|
||||
} -run
|
||||
|
||||
# HEAD requests : don't work well yet
|
||||
|
@ -261,4 +295,30 @@ client c3h2 -connect ${h1_feh2_sock} {
|
|||
txdata -data "this is sent and ignored"
|
||||
rxrst
|
||||
} -run
|
||||
|
||||
# fifth request is invalid and advertises invalid C-L ending with an
|
||||
# empty value, which results in a stream error.
|
||||
stream 9 {
|
||||
barrier b5 sync
|
||||
txreq \
|
||||
-req "POST" \
|
||||
-scheme "https" \
|
||||
-url "/test25.html" \
|
||||
-hdr "content-length" "0," \
|
||||
-nostrend
|
||||
rxrst
|
||||
} -run
|
||||
|
||||
# sixth request is invalid and advertises an empty C-L, which results
|
||||
# in a stream error.
|
||||
stream 11 {
|
||||
barrier b6 sync
|
||||
txreq \
|
||||
-req "POST" \
|
||||
-scheme "https" \
|
||||
-url "/test26.html" \
|
||||
-hdr "content-length" "" \
|
||||
-nostrend
|
||||
rxrst
|
||||
} -run
|
||||
} -run
|
||||
|
|
20
src/h1.c
20
src/h1.c
|
@ -34,13 +34,20 @@ int h1_parse_cont_len_header(struct h1m *h1m, struct ist *value)
|
|||
int not_first = !!(h1m->flags & H1_MF_CLEN);
|
||||
struct ist word;
|
||||
|
||||
word.ptr = value->ptr - 1; // -1 for next loop's pre-increment
|
||||
word.ptr = value->ptr;
|
||||
e = value->ptr + value->len;
|
||||
|
||||
while (++word.ptr < e) {
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
if (word.ptr >= e) {
|
||||
/* empty header or empty value */
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* skip leading delimiter and blanks */
|
||||
if (unlikely(HTTP_IS_LWS(*word.ptr)))
|
||||
if (unlikely(HTTP_IS_LWS(*word.ptr))) {
|
||||
word.ptr++;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* digits only now */
|
||||
for (cl = 0, n = word.ptr; n < e; n++) {
|
||||
|
@ -79,6 +86,13 @@ int h1_parse_cont_len_header(struct h1m *h1m, struct ist *value)
|
|||
h1m->flags |= H1_MF_CLEN;
|
||||
h1m->curr_len = h1m->body_len = cl;
|
||||
*value = word;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now either n==e and we're done, or n points to the comma,
|
||||
* and we skip it and continue.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (n++ == e)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
word.ptr = n;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* here we've reached the end with a single value or a series of
|
||||
|
|
20
src/http.c
20
src/http.c
|
@ -707,13 +707,20 @@ int http_parse_cont_len_header(struct ist *value, unsigned long long *body_len,
|
|||
struct ist word;
|
||||
int check_prev = not_first;
|
||||
|
||||
word.ptr = value->ptr - 1; // -1 for next loop's pre-increment
|
||||
word.ptr = value->ptr;
|
||||
e = value->ptr + value->len;
|
||||
|
||||
while (++word.ptr < e) {
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
if (word.ptr >= e) {
|
||||
/* empty header or empty value */
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* skip leading delimiter and blanks */
|
||||
if (unlikely(HTTP_IS_LWS(*word.ptr)))
|
||||
if (unlikely(HTTP_IS_LWS(*word.ptr))) {
|
||||
word.ptr++;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* digits only now */
|
||||
for (cl = 0, n = word.ptr; n < e; n++) {
|
||||
|
@ -751,6 +758,13 @@ int http_parse_cont_len_header(struct ist *value, unsigned long long *body_len,
|
|||
/* OK, store this result as the one to be indexed */
|
||||
*body_len = cl;
|
||||
*value = word;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now either n==e and we're done, or n points to the comma,
|
||||
* and we skip it and continue.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (n++ == e)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
word.ptr = n;
|
||||
check_prev = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue