mirror of
http://git.haproxy.org/git/haproxy.git/
synced 2025-02-22 13:46:52 +00:00
BUG/MAJOR: config: verify that targets of track-sc and stick rules are present
Stick and track-sc rules may optionally designate a table in a different proxy. In this case, a number of verifications are made such as validating that this proxy actually exists. However, in multi-process mode, the target table might indeed exist but not be bound to the set of processes the rules will execute on. This will definitely result in a random behaviour especially if these tables do require peer synchronization, because some tasks will be started to try to synchronize form uninitialized areas. The typical issue looks like this : peers my-peers peer foo ... listen proxy bind-process 1 stick on src table ip ... backend ip bind-process 2 stick-table type ip size 1k peers my-peers While it appears obvious that the example above will not work, there are less obvious situations, such as having bind-process in a defaults section and having a larger set of processes for the referencing proxy than the referenced one. The present patch adds checks for such situations by verifying that all processes from the referencing proxy are present on the other one in all track-sc* and stick-* rules, and in sample fetch / converters referencing another table so that sc_inc_gpc0() and similar are safe as well. This fix must be backported to all maintained versions. It may potentially disrupt configurations which already randomly crash. There hardly is any intermediary solution though, such configurations need to be fixed.
This commit is contained in:
parent
155acffc13
commit
151e1ca989
@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ int check_trk_action(struct act_rule *rule, struct proxy *px, char **err)
|
||||
trk_idx(rule->action));
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (px->bind_proc & ~target->bind_proc) {
|
||||
memprintf(err, "stick-table '%s' referenced by 'track-sc%d' rule not present on all processes covered by proxy '%s'",
|
||||
target->id, trk_idx(rule->action), px->id);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
free(rule->arg.trk_ctr.table.n);
|
||||
rule->arg.trk_ctr.table.t = &target->table;
|
||||
|
@ -2649,6 +2649,11 @@ int check_config_validity()
|
||||
curproxy->id, mrule->table.name ? mrule->table.name : curproxy->id);
|
||||
cfgerr++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (curproxy->bind_proc & ~target->bind_proc) {
|
||||
ha_alert("Proxy '%s': stick-table '%s' referenced 'stick-store' rule not present on all processes covered by proxy '%s'.\n",
|
||||
curproxy->id, target->id, curproxy->id);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
free((void *)mrule->table.name);
|
||||
mrule->table.t = &(target->table);
|
||||
@ -2682,6 +2687,11 @@ int check_config_validity()
|
||||
curproxy->id, mrule->table.name ? mrule->table.name : curproxy->id);
|
||||
cfgerr++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (curproxy->bind_proc & ~target->bind_proc) {
|
||||
ha_alert("Proxy '%s': stick-table '%s' referenced 'stick-store' rule not present on all processes covered by proxy '%s'.\n",
|
||||
curproxy->id, target->id, curproxy->id);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
free((void *)mrule->table.name);
|
||||
mrule->table.t = &(target->table);
|
||||
|
@ -1264,6 +1264,12 @@ int smp_resolve_args(struct proxy *p)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (p->bind_proc & ~px->bind_proc) {
|
||||
ha_alert("parsing [%s:%d] : stick-table '%s' not present on all processes covered by proxy '%s'.\n",
|
||||
cur->file, cur->line, px->id, p->id);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
free(arg->data.str.area);
|
||||
arg->data.str.area = NULL;
|
||||
arg->unresolved = 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user