gperftools/NEWS

110 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext

=== 20 January 2010 ===
I've just released perftools 1.5
This version has a slew of changes, leading to somewhat faster
performance and improvements in portability. It adds features like
`ITIMER_REAL` support to the cpu profiler, and `tc_set_new_mode` to
mimic the windows function of the same name. Full details are in the
[http://google-perftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/perftools-1.5/ChangeLog
ChangeLog].
=== 11 September 2009 ===
I've just released perftools 1.4
The major change this release is the addition of a debugging malloc
library! If you link with `libtcmalloc_debug.so` instead of
`libtcmalloc.so` (and likewise for the `minimal` variants) you'll get
a debugging malloc, which will catch double-frees, writes to freed
data, `free`/`delete` and `delete`/`delete[]` mismatches, and even
(optionally) writes past the end of an allocated block.
We plan to do more with this library in the future, including
supporting it on Windows, and adding the ability to use the debugging
library with your default malloc in addition to using it with
tcmalloc.
There are also the usual complement of bug fixes, documented in the
ChangeLog, and a few minor user-tunable knobs added to components like
the system allocator.
=== 9 June 2009 ===
I've just released perftools 1.3
Like 1.2, this has a variety of bug fixes, especially related to the
Windows build. One of my bugfixes is to undo the weird `ld -r` fix to
`.a` files that I introduced in perftools 1.2: it caused problems on
too many platforms. I've reverted back to normal `.a` files. To work
around the original problem that prompted the `ld -r` fix, I now
provide `libtcmalloc_and_profiler.a`, for folks who want to link in
both.
The most interesting API change is that I now not only override
`malloc`/`free`/etc, I also expose them via a unique set of symbols:
`tc_malloc`/`tc_free`/etc. This enables clients to write their own
memory wrappers that use tcmalloc:
{{{
void* malloc(size_t size) { void* r = tc_malloc(size); Log(r); return r; }
}}}
=== 17 April 2009 ===
I've just released perftools 1.2.
This is mostly a bugfix release. The major change is internal: I have
a new system for creating packages, which allows me to create 64-bit
packages. (I still don't do that for perftools, because there is
still no great 64-bit solution, with libunwind still giving problems
and --disable-frame-pointers not practical in every environment.)
Another interesting change involves Windows: a
[http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=126 new
patch] allows users to choose to override malloc/free/etc on Windows
rather than patching, as is done now. This can be used to create
custom CRTs.
My fix for this
[http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/1ff9b50043090d9d/a59210c4206f2060?lnk=gst&q=dynamic#a59210c4206f2060
bug involving static linking] ended up being to make libtcmalloc.a and
libperftools.a a big .o file, rather than a true `ar` archive. This
should not yield any problems in practice -- in fact, it should be
better, since the heap profiler, leak checker, and cpu profiler will
now all work even with the static libraries -- but if you find it
does, please file a bug report.
Finally, the profile_handler_unittest provided in the perftools
testsuite (new in this release) is failing on FreeBSD. The end-to-end
test that uses the profile-handler is passing, so I suspect the
problem may be with the test, not the perftools code itself. However,
I do not know enough about how itimers work on FreeBSD to be able to
debug it. If you can figure it out, please let me know!
=== 11 March 2009 ===
I've just released perftools 1.1!
It has many changes since perftools 1.0 including
* Faster performance due to dynamically sized thread caches
* Better heap-sampling for more realistic profiles
* Improved support on Windows (MSVC 7.1 and cygwin)
* Better stacktraces in linux (using VDSO)
* Many bug fixes and feature requests
Note: if you use the CPU-profiler with applications that fork without
doing an exec right afterwards, please see the README. Recent testing
has shown that profiles are unreliable in that case. The problem has
existed since the first release of perftools. We expect to have a fix
for perftools 1.2. For more details, see
[http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=105 issue 105].
Everyone who uses perftools 1.0 is encouraged to upgrade to perftools
1.1. If you see any problems with the new release, please file a bug
report at http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/list.
Enjoy!