From 6c436203522156699ef11c6792ed481e02cef366 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "chappedm@gmail.com" Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 14:36:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] amend-r165: forgot to regenrate configure and Makefile.in git-svn-id: http://gperftools.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@166 6b5cf1ce-ec42-a296-1ba9-69fdba395a50 --- Makefile.in | 4 ++-- configure | 6 ++---- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile.in b/Makefile.in index e2cd1f7..22145a8 100644 --- a/Makefile.in +++ b/Makefile.in @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ host_triplet = @host@ @ENABLE_FRAME_POINTERS_FALSE@@X86_64_AND_NO_FP_BY_DEFAULT_TRUE@am__append_6 = -DNO_FRAME_POINTER # As of gcc 4.6, -fomit-frame-pointer is the default even for i386. Since -# we must always have frame pointers for i386 in order to generate backtraces -# we now specify -fno-omit-frame-pointer by default (i386 only). +# we must always have frame pointers for gcc i386 in order to generate +# backtraces we now specify -fno-omit-frame-pointer by default (i386 only). @GCC_TRUE@@I386_TRUE@am__append_7 = -fno-omit-frame-pointer @MINGW_TRUE@am__append_8 = -Wl,-u__tcmalloc noinst_PROGRAMS = $(am__EXEEXT_1) $(am__EXEEXT_2) $(am__EXEEXT_3) \ diff --git a/configure b/configure index 601f852..396edf9 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -16543,8 +16543,7 @@ fi -# On x86_64, instead of libunwind, we can choose to compile with frame-pointers -# (This isn't needed on i386, where -fno-omit-frame-pointer is the default). +# On x86_64, instead of libunwind, we can choose to compile with frame-pointers. # Check whether --enable-frame_pointers was given. if test "${enable_frame_pointers+set}" = set; then : enableval=$enable_frame_pointers; @@ -16563,8 +16562,7 @@ else fi -# Some x86_64 systems do not insert frame pointers by default (all -# i386 systems that I know of, do. I don't know about non-x86 chips). +# Some x86_64 systems do not insert frame pointers by default. # We want to see if the current system is one of those. cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext /* end confdefs.h. */