amend-r165: forgot to regenrate configure and Makefile.in

git-svn-id: http://gperftools.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@166 6b5cf1ce-ec42-a296-1ba9-69fdba395a50
This commit is contained in:
chappedm@gmail.com 2012-11-03 14:36:33 +00:00
parent c566266b10
commit 6c43620352
2 changed files with 4 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ host_triplet = @host@
@ENABLE_FRAME_POINTERS_FALSE@@X86_64_AND_NO_FP_BY_DEFAULT_TRUE@am__append_6 = -DNO_FRAME_POINTER
# As of gcc 4.6, -fomit-frame-pointer is the default even for i386. Since
# we must always have frame pointers for i386 in order to generate backtraces
# we now specify -fno-omit-frame-pointer by default (i386 only).
# we must always have frame pointers for gcc i386 in order to generate
# backtraces we now specify -fno-omit-frame-pointer by default (i386 only).
@GCC_TRUE@@I386_TRUE@am__append_7 = -fno-omit-frame-pointer
@MINGW_TRUE@am__append_8 = -Wl,-u__tcmalloc
noinst_PROGRAMS = $(am__EXEEXT_1) $(am__EXEEXT_2) $(am__EXEEXT_3) \

6
configure vendored
View File

@ -16543,8 +16543,7 @@ fi
# On x86_64, instead of libunwind, we can choose to compile with frame-pointers
# (This isn't needed on i386, where -fno-omit-frame-pointer is the default).
# On x86_64, instead of libunwind, we can choose to compile with frame-pointers.
# Check whether --enable-frame_pointers was given.
if test "${enable_frame_pointers+set}" = set; then :
enableval=$enable_frame_pointers;
@ -16563,8 +16562,7 @@ else
fi
# Some x86_64 systems do not insert frame pointers by default (all
# i386 systems that I know of, do. I don't know about non-x86 chips).
# Some x86_64 systems do not insert frame pointers by default.
# We want to see if the current system is one of those.
cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
/* end confdefs.h. */