We will (most probably) remove non-ptrguard code before the next
release. Let's skip the tests already now, because they double the
likelihood of failing flaky tests.
Signed-off-by: Sven Anderson <sven@redhat.com>
Dependabot can automatically create PRs for packages that have have a
new release. By depending on recent versions of the consumed packages,
the result of the OpenSSF scorecard will improve.
See-also: https://deps.dev/go/github.com%2Fceph%2Fgo-ceph/
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Mergify has not been working for weeks as they removed support for the
deprecated style we were relying on. This is my first attempt to
update it to the new style.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
It's too easy to forget to triage a PR with the API label, and then
if the PR looks good and is approved the mergify system will merge
it. Move to using an explicit "no-API" label for marking the PR as truly
not having API changes and not requiring a 2nd review.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
The new make targets allow us to share (mirror-enabled) ceph container
instances. Use this to test both non-ptrguard and prtguard test runs
while dropping the (now redundant) non-mirror-enabled ceph + tests
container run.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
This implements the policy first outlined in
https://github.com/ceph/go-ceph/discussions/549
In short: if a PR includes API changes (has the API label) then
either 2 reviews are required or 1 review plus 10 days must pass;
if a PR includes no API changes, then only 1 review is needed.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
Tests are running against Ceph Pacific and passing, so this can be
marked as a required CI status.
dpulls handles dependencies between PRs, once the status is marked with
success, the requirements have all been merged. Prevent merging when
dpulls is in a failed state.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
In order to run CI jobs also on PRs that are based on other PRs, this
change adds the pattern 'pr/**' to the tested base branches. That
means, if PRs are pushed that are based on branches that start with
pr/... these PRs are also get tested. So, if we - by convention - push
PRs to branches like for example pr/ansiwen/myfix42, then all PRs
that are not based on master but another PR get tested as well.
Signed-off-by: Sven Anderson <sven@redhat.com>
The "extended-review" label indicates that review is likely to take
an extended period of time and for bots to not automatically take
a PR.
This avoid the need to preemptively mark a PR as changes needed or
give a false impression with a "do-not-merge" tag, which has a subtle
lack-of-quality implication.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
We had been using setup-go@v2-beta for a while, before v2 was out.
Now v2-beta is out of data and generating warnings in the github
actions ui.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
Enabling Smart-mode for "Strict Merge" causes Mergify to do a rebase of
the PR before merging. The rebase will trigger CI runs again, and
merging will be done only when the CI results are successful.
See-also: https://docs.mergify.io/actions.html#merge
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Unfortunately it is not recommended to use a regular expression to check
for the CI status of multiple tests. In case some tests do not run and
fail to report the status, Mergify will not know something is wrong and
PRs might get merged.
The only way to make sure all status checks have passed successfully, is
to list them all separately.
See-also: https://docs.mergify.io/conditions.html#validating-all-status-check
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Recently, changes to ceph nautilus reminded me that due to the low rate of PRs we don't always catch things that change in our dependencies right away. I propose adding a daily CI run that help catch these kind of things sooner and can help distinguish between a PR related failure and random flakiness and upstream changes.
These rules for Mergify do the following:
1. dismiss review +1's when a PR is updated
but keep any -1 reviews, so the reviewer needs to confirm the update
addresses the comment(s)
2. merge the PR when there are 2 (or more) positive reviews, and no
negative ones
don't merge when the 'do-not-merge' label is added to the PR
also require that the status checks (CI) has passed
3. in case there are merge conflicts, Mergify will leave a message
asking for a rebase
Documentation: https://docs.mergify.io/configuration.html
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Only octopus containers will have castxml available for now.
Conditionally grab the files generated by 'implements' and
make it available for later examination.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
This should basically run similarly to the travis ci configuration
but use the native github ci infrastructure.
In order to avoid messing around with various env vars I had to use the
v2-beta version of the go setup library. Once v2 has been released
we can switch away from the beta.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
