mirror of
https://git.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.git
synced 2024-12-25 00:32:31 +00:00
92 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
92 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
|
# Technical Committee
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
_This document only makes sense with the rules from [the community document](community)_.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The Technical Committee (**TC**) is here to arbitrate and make decisions when
|
||
|
|
technical conflicts occur in the project.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The TC main role is to resolve technical conflicts.
|
||
|
|
It is therefore not a technical steering committee, but it is understood that
|
||
|
|
some decisions might impact the future of the project.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Process
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Seizing
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The TC can take possession of any technical matter that it sees fit.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To involve the TC in a matter, email tc@ or CC them on an ongoing discussion.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
As members of TC are developers, they also can email tc@ to raise an issue.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Announcement
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The TC, once seized, must announce itself on the main mailing list, with a _[TC]_ tag.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The TC has 2 modes of operation: a RFC one and an internal one.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If the TC thinks it needs the input from the larger community, the TC can call
|
||
|
|
for a RFC. Else, it can decide by itself.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If the disagreement involves a member of the TC, that member should recuse
|
||
|
|
themselves from the decision.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The decision to use a RFC process or an internal discussion is a discretionary
|
||
|
|
decision of the TC.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The TC can also reject a seizure for a few reasons such as:
|
||
|
|
the matter was not discussed enough previously; it lacks expertise to reach a
|
||
|
|
beneficial decision on the matter; or the matter is too trivial.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### RFC call
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In the RFC mode, one person from the TC posts on the mailing list the
|
||
|
|
technical question and will request input from the community.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The mail will have the following specification:
|
||
|
|
* a precise title
|
||
|
|
* a specific tag [TC RFC]
|
||
|
|
* a top-level email
|
||
|
|
* contain a precise question that does not exceed 100 words and that is answerable by developers
|
||
|
|
* may have an extra description, or a link to a previous discussion, if deemed necessary,
|
||
|
|
* contain a precise end date for the answers.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The answers from the community must be on the main mailing list and must have
|
||
|
|
the following specification:
|
||
|
|
* keep the tag and the title unchanged
|
||
|
|
* limited to 400 words
|
||
|
|
* a first-level, answering directly to the main email
|
||
|
|
* answering to the question.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Further replies to answers are permitted, as long as they conform to the
|
||
|
|
community standards of politeness, they are limited to 100 words, and are not
|
||
|
|
nested more than once. (max-depth=2)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
After the end-date, mails on the thread will be ignored.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Violations of those rules will be escalated through the Community Committee.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
After all the emails are in, the TC has 96 hours to give its final decision.
|
||
|
|
Exceptionally, the TC can request an extra delay, that will be notified on the
|
||
|
|
mailing list.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Within TC
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In the internal case, the TC has 96 hours to give its final decision.
|
||
|
|
Exceptionally, the TC can request an extra delay.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Decisions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The decisions from the TC will be sent on the mailing list, with the _[TC]_ tag.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Internally, the TC should take decisions with a majority, or using
|
||
|
|
ranked-choice voting.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The decision from the TC should be published with a summary of the reasons that
|
||
|
|
lead to this decision.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The decisions from the TC are final, until the matters are reopened after
|
||
|
|
no less than one year.
|
||
|
|
|