mirror of
https://github.com/ceph/ceph
synced 2024-12-22 11:31:55 +00:00
28 lines
1.6 KiB
ReStructuredText
28 lines
1.6 KiB
ReStructuredText
C++17 and libstdc++ ABI
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
Ceph has switched over to C++17 in mimic. To build Ceph on old distros without
|
|
GCC-7, it is required to install GCC-7 from additionary repos. On RHEL/CentOS,
|
|
we are using devtoolset-7_ from SCLs_ for building Ceph. But devltoolset-7 is
|
|
always using the old ABI_ even if ``_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=1`` is defined. So,
|
|
on RHEL/CentOS, the old implementations of ``std::string`` and ``std::list``
|
|
are still used. In other words, ``std::string`` is still copy-on-write, and
|
|
``std::list::size()`` is still O(n) on these distros. But on Ubuntu Xenial,
|
|
Ceph is built using the new ABI. So, because we are still using libstdc++ and
|
|
devtoolset for building packages on RHEL/CentOS, please do not rely on the
|
|
behavior of the new ABI or the old one.
|
|
|
|
For those who argue that "GCC supports dual ABI!", here comes the long story.
|
|
The problem is in the system shared library and ``libstdc++_nonshared.a`` model.
|
|
If some symbol is exported from the system shared library, we must use that, and
|
|
cannot override it. Also, the dual ABI support requires several of the system
|
|
shared library symbols to behave differently (e.g. for locale facets, need
|
|
to register twice as many, one set for old ABI, another for new ABI). So, this
|
|
leaves us with no options but to stick with the old ABI, if we want to enable
|
|
the built binaries to run on old distros where only the libstdc++ with the old
|
|
ABI is available.
|
|
|
|
.. _ABI: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/using_dual_abi.html
|
|
.. _devtoolset-7: https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-7/
|
|
.. _SCLs: https://www.softwarecollections.org/
|