mirror of
https://github.com/ceph/ceph
synced 2024-12-27 14:03:25 +00:00
cd8e903c9c
Add unselectable prompts to doc/rados/operations/monitoring-osd-pg.rst. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57108 Signed-off-by: Zac Dover <zac.dover@gmail.com>
554 lines
23 KiB
ReStructuredText
554 lines
23 KiB
ReStructuredText
=========================
|
||
Monitoring OSDs and PGs
|
||
=========================
|
||
|
||
High availability and high reliability require a fault-tolerant approach to
|
||
managing hardware and software issues. Ceph has no single point-of-failure, and
|
||
can service requests for data in a "degraded" mode. Ceph's `data placement`_
|
||
introduces a layer of indirection to ensure that data doesn't bind directly to
|
||
particular OSD addresses. This means that tracking down system faults requires
|
||
finding the `placement group`_ and the underlying OSDs at root of the problem.
|
||
|
||
.. tip:: A fault in one part of the cluster may prevent you from accessing a
|
||
particular object, but that doesn't mean that you cannot access other objects.
|
||
When you run into a fault, don't panic. Just follow the steps for monitoring
|
||
your OSDs and placement groups. Then, begin troubleshooting.
|
||
|
||
Ceph is generally self-repairing. However, when problems persist, monitoring
|
||
OSDs and placement groups will help you identify the problem.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Monitoring OSDs
|
||
===============
|
||
|
||
An OSD's status is either in the cluster (``in``) or out of the cluster
|
||
(``out``); and, it is either up and running (``up``), or it is down and not
|
||
running (``down``). If an OSD is ``up``, it may be either ``in`` the cluster
|
||
(you can read and write data) or it is ``out`` of the cluster. If it was
|
||
``in`` the cluster and recently moved ``out`` of the cluster, Ceph will migrate
|
||
placement groups to other OSDs. If an OSD is ``out`` of the cluster, CRUSH will
|
||
not assign placement groups to the OSD. If an OSD is ``down``, it should also be
|
||
``out``.
|
||
|
||
.. note:: If an OSD is ``down`` and ``in``, there is a problem and the cluster
|
||
will not be in a healthy state.
|
||
|
||
.. ditaa::
|
||
|
||
+----------------+ +----------------+
|
||
| | | |
|
||
| OSD #n In | | OSD #n Up |
|
||
| | | |
|
||
+----------------+ +----------------+
|
||
^ ^
|
||
| |
|
||
| |
|
||
v v
|
||
+----------------+ +----------------+
|
||
| | | |
|
||
| OSD #n Out | | OSD #n Down |
|
||
| | | |
|
||
+----------------+ +----------------+
|
||
|
||
If you execute a command such as ``ceph health``, ``ceph -s`` or ``ceph -w``,
|
||
you may notice that the cluster does not always echo back ``HEALTH OK``. Don't
|
||
panic. With respect to OSDs, you should expect that the cluster will **NOT**
|
||
echo ``HEALTH OK`` in a few expected circumstances:
|
||
|
||
#. You haven't started the cluster yet (it won't respond).
|
||
#. You have just started or restarted the cluster and it's not ready yet,
|
||
because the placement groups are getting created and the OSDs are in
|
||
the process of peering.
|
||
#. You just added or removed an OSD.
|
||
#. You just have modified your cluster map.
|
||
|
||
An important aspect of monitoring OSDs is to ensure that when the cluster
|
||
is up and running that all OSDs that are ``in`` the cluster are ``up`` and
|
||
running, too. To see if all OSDs are running, execute:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
ceph osd stat
|
||
|
||
The result should tell you the total number of OSDs (x),
|
||
how many are ``up`` (y), how many are ``in`` (z) and the map epoch (eNNNN). ::
|
||
|
||
x osds: y up, z in; epoch: eNNNN
|
||
|
||
If the number of OSDs that are ``in`` the cluster is more than the number of
|
||
OSDs that are ``up``, execute the following command to identify the ``ceph-osd``
|
||
daemons that are not running:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
ceph osd tree
|
||
|
||
::
|
||
|
||
#ID CLASS WEIGHT TYPE NAME STATUS REWEIGHT PRI-AFF
|
||
-1 2.00000 pool openstack
|
||
-3 2.00000 rack dell-2950-rack-A
|
||
-2 2.00000 host dell-2950-A1
|
||
0 ssd 1.00000 osd.0 up 1.00000 1.00000
|
||
1 ssd 1.00000 osd.1 down 1.00000 1.00000
|
||
|
||
.. tip:: The ability to search through a well-designed CRUSH hierarchy may help
|
||
you troubleshoot your cluster by identifying the physical locations faster.
|
||
|
||
If an OSD is ``down``, start it:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
sudo systemctl start ceph-osd@1
|
||
|
||
See `OSD Not Running`_ for problems associated with OSDs that stopped, or won't
|
||
restart.
|
||
|
||
|
||
PG Sets
|
||
=======
|
||
|
||
When CRUSH assigns placement groups to OSDs, it looks at the number of replicas
|
||
for the pool and assigns the placement group to OSDs such that each replica of
|
||
the placement group gets assigned to a different OSD. For example, if the pool
|
||
requires three replicas of a placement group, CRUSH may assign them to
|
||
``osd.1``, ``osd.2`` and ``osd.3`` respectively. CRUSH actually seeks a
|
||
pseudo-random placement that will take into account failure domains you set in
|
||
your `CRUSH map`_, so you will rarely see placement groups assigned to nearest
|
||
neighbor OSDs in a large cluster.
|
||
|
||
Ceph processes a client request using the **Acting Set**, which is the set of
|
||
OSDs that will actually handle the requests since they have a full and working
|
||
version of a placement group shard. The set of OSDs that should contain a shard
|
||
of a particular placement group as the **Up Set**, i.e. where data is
|
||
moved/copied to (or planned to be).
|
||
|
||
In some cases, an OSD in the Acting Set is ``down`` or otherwise not able to
|
||
service requests for objects in the placement group. When these situations
|
||
arise, don't panic. Common examples include:
|
||
|
||
- You added or removed an OSD. Then, CRUSH reassigned the placement group to
|
||
other OSDs--thereby changing the composition of the Acting Set and spawning
|
||
the migration of data with a "backfill" process.
|
||
- An OSD was ``down``, was restarted, and is now ``recovering``.
|
||
- An OSD in the Acting Set is ``down`` or unable to service requests,
|
||
and another OSD has temporarily assumed its duties.
|
||
|
||
In most cases, the Up Set and the Acting Set are identical. When they are not,
|
||
it may indicate that Ceph is migrating the PG (it's remapped), an OSD is
|
||
recovering, or that there is a problem (i.e., Ceph usually echoes a "HEALTH
|
||
WARN" state with a "stuck stale" message in such scenarios).
|
||
|
||
To retrieve a list of placement groups, execute:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
ceph pg dump
|
||
|
||
To view which OSDs are within the Acting Set or the Up Set for a given placement
|
||
group, execute:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
ceph pg map {pg-num}
|
||
|
||
The result should tell you the osdmap epoch (eNNN), the placement group number
|
||
({pg-num}), the OSDs in the Up Set (up[]), and the OSDs in the acting set
|
||
(acting[])::
|
||
|
||
osdmap eNNN pg {raw-pg-num} ({pg-num}) -> up [0,1,2] acting [0,1,2]
|
||
|
||
.. note:: If the Up Set and Acting Set do not match, this may be an indicator
|
||
that the cluster rebalancing itself or of a potential problem with
|
||
the cluster.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Peering
|
||
=======
|
||
|
||
Before you can write data to a placement group, it must be in an ``active``
|
||
state, and it **should** be in a ``clean`` state. For Ceph to determine the
|
||
current state of a placement group, the primary OSD of the placement group
|
||
(i.e., the first OSD in the acting set), peers with the secondary and tertiary
|
||
OSDs to establish agreement on the current state of the placement group
|
||
(assuming a pool with 3 replicas of the PG).
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. ditaa::
|
||
|
||
+---------+ +---------+ +-------+
|
||
| OSD 1 | | OSD 2 | | OSD 3 |
|
||
+---------+ +---------+ +-------+
|
||
| | |
|
||
| Request To | |
|
||
| Peer | |
|
||
|-------------->| |
|
||
|<--------------| |
|
||
| Peering |
|
||
| |
|
||
| Request To |
|
||
| Peer |
|
||
|----------------------------->|
|
||
|<-----------------------------|
|
||
| Peering |
|
||
|
||
The OSDs also report their status to the monitor. See `Configuring Monitor/OSD
|
||
Interaction`_ for details. To troubleshoot peering issues, see `Peering
|
||
Failure`_.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Monitoring Placement Group States
|
||
=================================
|
||
|
||
If you execute a command such as ``ceph health``, ``ceph -s`` or ``ceph -w``,
|
||
you may notice that the cluster does not always echo back ``HEALTH OK``. After
|
||
you check to see if the OSDs are running, you should also check placement group
|
||
states. You should expect that the cluster will **NOT** echo ``HEALTH OK`` in a
|
||
number of placement group peering-related circumstances:
|
||
|
||
#. You have just created a pool and placement groups haven't peered yet.
|
||
#. The placement groups are recovering.
|
||
#. You have just added an OSD to or removed an OSD from the cluster.
|
||
#. You have just modified your CRUSH map and your placement groups are migrating.
|
||
#. There is inconsistent data in different replicas of a placement group.
|
||
#. Ceph is scrubbing a placement group's replicas.
|
||
#. Ceph doesn't have enough storage capacity to complete backfilling operations.
|
||
|
||
If one of the foregoing circumstances causes Ceph to echo ``HEALTH WARN``, don't
|
||
panic. In many cases, the cluster will recover on its own. In some cases, you
|
||
may need to take action. An important aspect of monitoring placement groups is
|
||
to ensure that when the cluster is up and running that all placement groups are
|
||
``active``, and preferably in the ``clean`` state. To see the status of all
|
||
placement groups, execute:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
ceph pg stat
|
||
|
||
The result should tell you the total number of placement groups (x), how many
|
||
placement groups are in a particular state such as ``active+clean`` (y) and the
|
||
amount of data stored (z). ::
|
||
|
||
x pgs: y active+clean; z bytes data, aa MB used, bb GB / cc GB avail
|
||
|
||
.. note:: It is common for Ceph to report multiple states for placement groups.
|
||
|
||
In addition to the placement group states, Ceph will also echo back the amount of
|
||
storage capacity used (aa), the amount of storage capacity remaining (bb), and the total
|
||
storage capacity for the placement group. These numbers can be important in a
|
||
few cases:
|
||
|
||
- You are reaching your ``near full ratio`` or ``full ratio``.
|
||
- Your data is not getting distributed across the cluster due to an
|
||
error in your CRUSH configuration.
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. topic:: Placement Group IDs
|
||
|
||
Placement group IDs consist of the pool number (not pool name) followed
|
||
by a period (.) and the placement group ID--a hexadecimal number. You
|
||
can view pool numbers and their names from the output of ``ceph osd
|
||
lspools``. For example, the first pool created corresponds to
|
||
pool number ``1``. A fully qualified placement group ID has the
|
||
following form::
|
||
|
||
{pool-num}.{pg-id}
|
||
|
||
And it typically looks like this::
|
||
|
||
1.1f
|
||
|
||
|
||
To retrieve a list of placement groups, execute the following:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
ceph pg dump
|
||
|
||
You can also format the output in JSON format and save it to a file:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
ceph pg dump -o {filename} --format=json
|
||
|
||
To query a particular placement group, execute the following:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
ceph pg {poolnum}.{pg-id} query
|
||
|
||
Ceph will output the query in JSON format.
|
||
|
||
The following subsections describe the common pg states in detail.
|
||
|
||
Creating
|
||
--------
|
||
|
||
When you create a pool, it will create the number of placement groups you
|
||
specified. Ceph will echo ``creating`` when it is creating one or more
|
||
placement groups. Once they are created, the OSDs that are part of a placement
|
||
group's Acting Set will peer. Once peering is complete, the placement group
|
||
status should be ``active+clean``, which means a Ceph client can begin writing
|
||
to the placement group.
|
||
|
||
.. ditaa::
|
||
|
||
/-----------\ /-----------\ /-----------\
|
||
| Creating |------>| Peering |------>| Active |
|
||
\-----------/ \-----------/ \-----------/
|
||
|
||
Peering
|
||
-------
|
||
|
||
When Ceph is Peering a placement group, Ceph is bringing the OSDs that
|
||
store the replicas of the placement group into **agreement about the state**
|
||
of the objects and metadata in the placement group. When Ceph completes peering,
|
||
this means that the OSDs that store the placement group agree about the current
|
||
state of the placement group. However, completion of the peering process does
|
||
**NOT** mean that each replica has the latest contents.
|
||
|
||
.. topic:: Authoritative History
|
||
|
||
Ceph will **NOT** acknowledge a write operation to a client, until
|
||
all OSDs of the acting set persist the write operation. This practice
|
||
ensures that at least one member of the acting set will have a record
|
||
of every acknowledged write operation since the last successful
|
||
peering operation.
|
||
|
||
With an accurate record of each acknowledged write operation, Ceph can
|
||
construct and disseminate a new authoritative history of the placement
|
||
group--a complete, and fully ordered set of operations that, if performed,
|
||
would bring an OSD’s copy of a placement group up to date.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Active
|
||
------
|
||
|
||
Once Ceph completes the peering process, a placement group may become
|
||
``active``. The ``active`` state means that the data in the placement group is
|
||
generally available in the primary placement group and the replicas for read
|
||
and write operations.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Clean
|
||
-----
|
||
|
||
When a placement group is in the ``clean`` state, the primary OSD and the
|
||
replica OSDs have successfully peered and there are no stray replicas for the
|
||
placement group. Ceph replicated all objects in the placement group the correct
|
||
number of times.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Degraded
|
||
--------
|
||
|
||
When a client writes an object to the primary OSD, the primary OSD is
|
||
responsible for writing the replicas to the replica OSDs. After the primary OSD
|
||
writes the object to storage, the placement group will remain in a ``degraded``
|
||
state until the primary OSD has received an acknowledgement from the replica
|
||
OSDs that Ceph created the replica objects successfully.
|
||
|
||
The reason a placement group can be ``active+degraded`` is that an OSD may be
|
||
``active`` even though it doesn't hold all of the objects yet. If an OSD goes
|
||
``down``, Ceph marks each placement group assigned to the OSD as ``degraded``.
|
||
The OSDs must peer again when the OSD comes back online. However, a client can
|
||
still write a new object to a ``degraded`` placement group if it is ``active``.
|
||
|
||
If an OSD is ``down`` and the ``degraded`` condition persists, Ceph may mark the
|
||
``down`` OSD as ``out`` of the cluster and remap the data from the ``down`` OSD
|
||
to another OSD. The time between being marked ``down`` and being marked ``out``
|
||
is controlled by ``mon_osd_down_out_interval``, which is set to ``600`` seconds
|
||
by default.
|
||
|
||
A placement group can also be ``degraded``, because Ceph cannot find one or more
|
||
objects that Ceph thinks should be in the placement group. While you cannot
|
||
read or write to unfound objects, you can still access all of the other objects
|
||
in the ``degraded`` placement group.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Recovering
|
||
----------
|
||
|
||
Ceph was designed for fault-tolerance at a scale where hardware and software
|
||
problems are ongoing. When an OSD goes ``down``, its contents may fall behind
|
||
the current state of other replicas in the placement groups. When the OSD is
|
||
back ``up``, the contents of the placement groups must be updated to reflect the
|
||
current state. During that time period, the OSD may reflect a ``recovering``
|
||
state.
|
||
|
||
Recovery is not always trivial, because a hardware failure might cause a
|
||
cascading failure of multiple OSDs. For example, a network switch for a rack or
|
||
cabinet may fail, which can cause the OSDs of a number of host machines to fall
|
||
behind the current state of the cluster. Each one of the OSDs must recover once
|
||
the fault is resolved.
|
||
|
||
Ceph provides a number of settings to balance the resource contention between
|
||
new service requests and the need to recover data objects and restore the
|
||
placement groups to the current state. The ``osd_recovery_delay_start`` setting
|
||
allows an OSD to restart, re-peer and even process some replay requests before
|
||
starting the recovery process. The ``osd_recovery_thread_timeout`` sets a thread
|
||
timeout, because multiple OSDs may fail, restart and re-peer at staggered rates.
|
||
The ``osd_recovery_max_active`` setting limits the number of recovery requests
|
||
an OSD will entertain simultaneously to prevent the OSD from failing to serve.
|
||
The ``osd_recovery_max_chunk`` setting limits the size of the recovered data
|
||
chunks to prevent network congestion.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Back Filling
|
||
------------
|
||
|
||
When a new OSD joins the cluster, CRUSH will reassign placement groups from OSDs
|
||
in the cluster to the newly added OSD. Forcing the new OSD to accept the
|
||
reassigned placement groups immediately can put excessive load on the new OSD.
|
||
Back filling the OSD with the placement groups allows this process to begin in
|
||
the background. Once backfilling is complete, the new OSD will begin serving
|
||
requests when it is ready.
|
||
|
||
During the backfill operations, you may see one of several states:
|
||
``backfill_wait`` indicates that a backfill operation is pending, but is not
|
||
underway yet; ``backfilling`` indicates that a backfill operation is underway;
|
||
and, ``backfill_toofull`` indicates that a backfill operation was requested,
|
||
but couldn't be completed due to insufficient storage capacity. When a
|
||
placement group cannot be backfilled, it may be considered ``incomplete``.
|
||
|
||
The ``backfill_toofull`` state may be transient. It is possible that as PGs
|
||
are moved around, space may become available. The ``backfill_toofull`` is
|
||
similar to ``backfill_wait`` in that as soon as conditions change
|
||
backfill can proceed.
|
||
|
||
Ceph provides a number of settings to manage the load spike associated with
|
||
reassigning placement groups to an OSD (especially a new OSD). By default,
|
||
``osd_max_backfills`` sets the maximum number of concurrent backfills to and from
|
||
an OSD to 1. The ``backfill_full_ratio`` enables an OSD to refuse a
|
||
backfill request if the OSD is approaching its full ratio (90%, by default) and
|
||
change with ``ceph osd set-backfillfull-ratio`` command.
|
||
If an OSD refuses a backfill request, the ``osd_backfill_retry_interval``
|
||
enables an OSD to retry the request (after 30 seconds, by default). OSDs can
|
||
also set ``osd_backfill_scan_min`` and ``osd_backfill_scan_max`` to manage scan
|
||
intervals (64 and 512, by default).
|
||
|
||
|
||
Remapped
|
||
--------
|
||
|
||
When the Acting Set that services a placement group changes, the data migrates
|
||
from the old acting set to the new acting set. It may take some time for a new
|
||
primary OSD to service requests. So it may ask the old primary to continue to
|
||
service requests until the placement group migration is complete. Once data
|
||
migration completes, the mapping uses the primary OSD of the new acting set.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Stale
|
||
-----
|
||
|
||
While Ceph uses heartbeats to ensure that hosts and daemons are running, the
|
||
``ceph-osd`` daemons may also get into a ``stuck`` state where they are not
|
||
reporting statistics in a timely manner (e.g., a temporary network fault). By
|
||
default, OSD daemons report their placement group, up through, boot and failure
|
||
statistics every half second (i.e., ``0.5``), which is more frequent than the
|
||
heartbeat thresholds. If the **Primary OSD** of a placement group's acting set
|
||
fails to report to the monitor or if other OSDs have reported the primary OSD
|
||
``down``, the monitors will mark the placement group ``stale``.
|
||
|
||
When you start your cluster, it is common to see the ``stale`` state until
|
||
the peering process completes. After your cluster has been running for awhile,
|
||
seeing placement groups in the ``stale`` state indicates that the primary OSD
|
||
for those placement groups is ``down`` or not reporting placement group statistics
|
||
to the monitor.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Identifying Troubled PGs
|
||
========================
|
||
|
||
As previously noted, a placement group is not necessarily problematic just
|
||
because its state is not ``active+clean``. Generally, Ceph's ability to self
|
||
repair may not be working when placement groups get stuck. The stuck states
|
||
include:
|
||
|
||
- **Unclean**: Placement groups contain objects that are not replicated the
|
||
desired number of times. They should be recovering.
|
||
- **Inactive**: Placement groups cannot process reads or writes because they
|
||
are waiting for an OSD with the most up-to-date data to come back ``up``.
|
||
- **Stale**: Placement groups are in an unknown state, because the OSDs that
|
||
host them have not reported to the monitor cluster in a while (configured
|
||
by ``mon_osd_report_timeout``).
|
||
|
||
To identify stuck placement groups, execute the following:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
ceph pg dump_stuck [unclean|inactive|stale|undersized|degraded]
|
||
|
||
See `Placement Group Subsystem`_ for additional details. To troubleshoot
|
||
stuck placement groups, see `Troubleshooting PG Errors`_.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Finding an Object Location
|
||
==========================
|
||
|
||
To store object data in the Ceph Object Store, a Ceph client must:
|
||
|
||
#. Set an object name
|
||
#. Specify a `pool`_
|
||
|
||
The Ceph client retrieves the latest cluster map and the CRUSH algorithm
|
||
calculates how to map the object to a `placement group`_, and then calculates
|
||
how to assign the placement group to an OSD dynamically. To find the object
|
||
location, all you need is the object name and the pool name. For example:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
ceph osd map {poolname} {object-name} [namespace]
|
||
|
||
.. topic:: Exercise: Locate an Object
|
||
|
||
As an exercise, let's create an object. Specify an object name, a path
|
||
to a test file containing some object data and a pool name using the
|
||
``rados put`` command on the command line. For example:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
rados put {object-name} {file-path} --pool=data
|
||
rados put test-object-1 testfile.txt --pool=data
|
||
|
||
To verify that the Ceph Object Store stored the object, execute the
|
||
following:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
rados -p data ls
|
||
|
||
Now, identify the object location:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
ceph osd map {pool-name} {object-name}
|
||
ceph osd map data test-object-1
|
||
|
||
Ceph should output the object's location. For example::
|
||
|
||
osdmap e537 pool 'data' (1) object 'test-object-1' -> pg 1.d1743484 (1.4) -> up ([0,1], p0) acting ([0,1], p0)
|
||
|
||
To remove the test object, simply delete it using the ``rados rm``
|
||
command. For example:
|
||
|
||
.. prompt:: bash $
|
||
|
||
rados rm test-object-1 --pool=data
|
||
|
||
|
||
As the cluster evolves, the object location may change dynamically. One benefit
|
||
of Ceph's dynamic rebalancing is that Ceph relieves you from having to perform
|
||
the migration manually. See the `Architecture`_ section for details.
|
||
|
||
.. _data placement: ../data-placement
|
||
.. _pool: ../pools
|
||
.. _placement group: ../placement-groups
|
||
.. _Architecture: ../../../architecture
|
||
.. _OSD Not Running: ../../troubleshooting/troubleshooting-osd#osd-not-running
|
||
.. _Troubleshooting PG Errors: ../../troubleshooting/troubleshooting-pg#troubleshooting-pg-errors
|
||
.. _Peering Failure: ../../troubleshooting/troubleshooting-pg#failures-osd-peering
|
||
.. _CRUSH map: ../crush-map
|
||
.. _Configuring Monitor/OSD Interaction: ../../configuration/mon-osd-interaction/
|
||
.. _Placement Group Subsystem: ../control#placement-group-subsystem
|