mirror of
https://github.com/ceph/ceph
synced 2024-12-22 19:34:30 +00:00
213 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText
213 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText
==========================
|
|
Hardware Recommendations
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
Ceph was designed to run on commodity hardware, which makes building and
|
|
maintaining petabyte-scale data clusters economically feasible.
|
|
When planning out your cluster hardware, you will need to balance a number
|
|
of considerations, including failure domains and potential performance
|
|
issues. Hardware planning should include distributing Ceph daemons and
|
|
other processes that use Ceph across many hosts. Generally, we recommend
|
|
running Ceph daemons of a specific type on a host configured for that type
|
|
of daemon. We recommend using other hosts for processes that utilize your
|
|
data cluster (e.g., OpenStack, CloudStack, etc).
|
|
|
|
`Inktank`_ provides excellent premium support for hardware planning.
|
|
|
|
.. _Inktank: http://www.inktank.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPU
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
Ceph metadata servers dynamically redistribute their load, which is CPU
|
|
intensive. So your metadata servers should have significant processing power
|
|
(e.g., quad core or better CPUs). Ceph OSDs run the RADOS service, calculate
|
|
data placement with CRUSH, replicate data, and maintain their own copy of the
|
|
cluster map. Therefore, OSDs should have a reasonable amount of processing power
|
|
(e.g., dual-core processors). Monitors simply maintain a master copy of the
|
|
cluster map, so they are not CPU intensive. You must also consider whether the
|
|
host machine will run CPU-intensive processes in addition to Ceph daemons. For
|
|
example, if your hosts will run computing VMs (e.g., OpenStack Nova), you will
|
|
need to ensure that these other processes leave sufficient processing power for
|
|
Ceph daemons. We recommend running additional CPU-intensive processes on
|
|
separate hosts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RAM
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
Metadata servers and monitors must be capable of serving their data quickly, so
|
|
they should have plenty of RAM (e.g., 1GB of RAM per daemon instance). OSDs do
|
|
not require as much RAM (e.g., 500MB of RAM per daemon instance). Generally,
|
|
more RAM is better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data Storage
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
Plan your data storage configuration carefully, because there are significant
|
|
opportunities for performance improvement by incurring the added cost of using
|
|
solid state drives, and there are significant cost-per-gigabyte considerations
|
|
with hard disk drives. Metadata servers and monitors don't use a lot of storage
|
|
space. A metadata server requires approximately 1MB of storage space per daemon
|
|
instance. A monitor requires approximately 10GB of storage space per daemon
|
|
instance. One opportunity for performance improvement is to use solid-state
|
|
drives to reduce random access time and read latency while accelerating
|
|
throughput. Solid state drives cost more than 10x as much per gigabyte when
|
|
compared to a hard disk, but they often exhibit access times that are at least
|
|
100x faster than a hard disk drive. Since the storage requirements for metadata
|
|
servers and monitors are so low, solid state drives may provide an economical
|
|
opportunity to improve performance. OSDs should have plenty of disk space. We
|
|
recommend a minimum disk size of 1 terabyte. We recommend dividing the price of
|
|
the hard disk drive by the number of gigabytes to arrive at a cost per
|
|
gigabyte, because larger drives may have a significant impact on the
|
|
cost-per-gigabyte. For example, a 1 terabyte hard disk priced at $75.00 has a
|
|
cost of $0.07 per gigabyte (i.e., $75 / 1024 = 0.0732). By contrast, a 3
|
|
terabyte hard disk priced at $150.00 has a cost of $0.05 per gigabyte (i.e.,
|
|
$150 / 3072 = 0.0488). In the foregoing example, using the 1 terabyte disks
|
|
would generally increase the cost per gigabyte by 40%--rendering your cluster
|
|
substantially less cost efficient. For OSD hosts, we recommend using an OS disk
|
|
for the operating system and software, and one disk for each OSD daemon you run
|
|
on the host. While solid state drives are cost prohibitive for object storage,
|
|
OSDs may see a performance improvement by storing an OSD's journal on a solid
|
|
state drive and the OSD's object data on a hard disk drive. You may run multiple
|
|
OSDs per host, but you should ensure that the sum of the total throughput of
|
|
your OSD hard disks doesn't exceed the network bandwidth required to service a
|
|
client's need to read or write data. You should also consider what percentage of
|
|
the cluster's data storage is on each host. If the percentage is large and the
|
|
host fails, it can lead to problems such as exceeding the ``full ratio``, which
|
|
causes Ceph to halt operations as a safety precaution that prevents data loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Networks
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
We recommend that each host have at least two 1Gbps network interface
|
|
controllers (NICs). Since most commodity hard disk drives have a throughput of
|
|
approximately 100MB/second, your NICs should be able to handle the traffic for
|
|
the OSD disks on your host. We recommend a minimum of two NICs to account for a
|
|
public (front-side) network and a cluster (back-side) network. A cluster network
|
|
(preferably not connected to the internet) handles the additional load for data
|
|
replication and helps stop denial of service attacks that prevent the cluster
|
|
from achieving ``active + clean`` states for placement groups as OSDs replicate
|
|
data across the cluster. Consider starting with a 10Gbps network in your racks.
|
|
Replicating 1TB of data across a 1Gbps network takes 3 hours, and 3TBs (a
|
|
typical drive configuration) takes 9 hours. By contrast, with a 10Gbps network,
|
|
the replication times would be 20 minutes and 1 hour respectively. In a
|
|
petabyte-scale cluster, failure of an OSD disk should be an expectation, not an
|
|
exception. System administrators will appreciate PGs recovering from a
|
|
``degraded`` state to an ``active + clean`` state as rapidly as possible, with
|
|
price / performance tradeoffs taken into consideration. Additionally, some
|
|
deployment tools (e.g., Dell's Crowbar) deploy with five different networks,
|
|
but employ VLANs to make hardware and network cabling more manageable. VLANs
|
|
using 802.1q protocol require VLAN-capable NICs and Switches. The added hardware
|
|
expense may be offset by the operational cost savings for network setup and
|
|
maintenance. When using VLANs to handle VM traffic between between the cluster
|
|
and compute stacks (e.g., OpenStack, CloudStack, etc.), it is also worth
|
|
considering using 10G Ethernet. Top-of-rack routers for each network also need
|
|
to be able to communicate with spine routers that have even faster
|
|
throughput--e.g., 40Gbps to 100Gbps.
|
|
|
|
Your server hardware should have a Baseboard Management Controller (BMC).
|
|
Administration and deployment tools may also use BMCs extensively, so consider
|
|
the cost/benefit tradeoff of an out-of-band network for administration.
|
|
Hypervisor SSH access, VM image uploads, OS image installs, management sockets,
|
|
etc. can impose significant loads on a network. Running three networks may seem
|
|
like overkill, but each traffic path represents a potential capacity, throughput
|
|
and/or performance bottleneck that you should carefully consider before
|
|
deploying a large scale data cluster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Failure Domains
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
A failure domain is any failure that prevents access to one or more OSDs. That
|
|
could be a stopped daemon on a host; a hard disk failure, an OS crash, a
|
|
malfunctioning NIC, a failed power supply, a network outage, a power outage, and
|
|
so forth. When planning out your hardware needs, you must balance the
|
|
temptation to reduce costs by placing too many responsibilities into too few
|
|
failure domains, and the added costs of isolating every potential failure
|
|
domain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Hardware Recommendations
|
|
================================
|
|
|
|
Ceph can run on inexpensive commodity hardware. Small production clusters
|
|
and development clusters can run successfully with modest hardware.
|
|
|
|
+--------------+----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| Process | Criteria | Minimum Recommended |
|
|
+==============+================+====================================+
|
|
| ``ceph-osd`` | Processor | 1x 64-bit AMD-64/i386 dual-core |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | RAM | 500 MB per daemon |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | Volume Storage | 1x Disk per daemon |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | Network | 2x 1GB Ethernet NICs |
|
|
+--------------+----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| ``ceph-mon`` | Processor | 1x 64-bit AMD-64/i386 |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | RAM | 1 GB per daemon |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | Disk Space | 10 GB per daemon |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | Network | 2x 1GB Ethernet NICs |
|
|
+--------------+----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| ``ceph-mds`` | Processor | 1x 64-bit AMD-64/i386 quad-core |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | RAM | 1 GB minimum per daemon |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | Disk Space | 1 MB per daemon |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | Network | 2x 1GB Ethernet NICs |
|
|
+--------------+----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
.. important:: If you are running an OSD with a single disk, create a
|
|
partition for your volume storage that is separate from the partition
|
|
containing the OS. Generally, we recommend separate disks for the
|
|
OS and the volume storage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production Cluster Example
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
Production clusters for petabyte scale data storage may also use commodity
|
|
hardware, but should have considerably more memory, processing power and data
|
|
storage to account for heavy traffic loads.
|
|
|
|
A recent (2012) Ceph cluster project is using two fairly robust hardware
|
|
configurations for Ceph OSDs, and a lighter configuration for monitors.
|
|
|
|
+----------------+----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| Configuration | Criteria | Minimum Recommended |
|
|
+================+================+====================================+
|
|
| Dell PE R510 | Processor | 2x 64-bit quad-core Xeon CPUs |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | RAM | 16 GB |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | Volume Storage | 8x 2TB drives. 1 OS, 7 Storage |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | Client Network | 2x 1GB Ethernet NICs |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | OSD Network | 2x 1GB Ethernet NICs |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | Mgmt. Network | 2x 1GB Ethernet NICs |
|
|
+----------------+----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| Dell PE R515 | Processor | 1x hex-core Opteron CPU |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | RAM | 16 GB |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | Volume Storage | 12x 3TB drives. Storage |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | OS Storage | 1x 500GB drive. Operating System. |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | Client Network | 2x 1GB Ethernet NICs |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | OSD Network | 2x 1GB Ethernet NICs |
|
|
| +----------------+------------------------------------+
|
|
| | Mgmt. Network | 2x 1GB Ethernet NICs |
|
|
+----------------+----------------+------------------------------------+
|