mirror of
https://github.com/ceph/ceph
synced 2024-12-22 11:31:55 +00:00
93f9007da3
Signed-off-by: Jian Su <sujian@umcloud.com>
123 lines
5.6 KiB
ReStructuredText
123 lines
5.6 KiB
ReStructuredText
CephFS Snapshots
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
CephFS supports snapshots, generally created by invoking mkdir against the
|
|
(hidden, special) .snap directory.
|
|
|
|
Overview
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
Generally, snapshots do what they sound like: they create an immutable view
|
|
of the filesystem at the point in time they're taken. There are some headline
|
|
features that make CephFS snapshots different from what you might expect:
|
|
|
|
* Arbitrary subtrees. Snapshots are created within any directory you choose,
|
|
and cover all data in the filesystem under that directory.
|
|
* Asynchronous. If you create a snapshot, buffered data is flushed out lazily,
|
|
including from other clients. As a result, "creating" the snapshot is
|
|
very fast.
|
|
|
|
Important Data Structures
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
* SnapRealm: A `SnapRealm` is created whenever you create a snapshot at a new
|
|
point in the hierarchy (or, when a snapshotted inode is moved outside of its
|
|
parent snapshot). SnapRealms contain an `sr_t srnode`, links to `past_parents`
|
|
and `past_children`, and all `inodes_with_caps` that are part of the snapshot.
|
|
Clients also have a SnapRealm concept that maintains less data but is used to
|
|
associate a `SnapContext` with each open file for writing.
|
|
* sr_t: An `sr_t` is the on-disk snapshot metadata. It is part of the containing
|
|
directory and contains sequence counters, timestamps, the list of associated
|
|
snapshot IDs, and `past_parents`.
|
|
* snaplink_t: `past_parents` et al are stored on-disk as a `snaplink_t`, holding
|
|
the inode number and first `snapid` of the inode/snapshot referenced.
|
|
|
|
Creating a snapshot
|
|
-------------------
|
|
Because CephFS snapshot currently is an experimental feature, we are supposed
|
|
to enable it explicitly by the command below before testing.
|
|
|
|
.. code::
|
|
|
|
$ ceph fs set <fs_name> allow_new_snaps true --yes-i-really-mean-it
|
|
|
|
|
|
To make a snapshot on directory "/1/2/3/foo", the client invokes "mkdir" on
|
|
"/1/2/3/foo/.snap" directory. This is transmitted to the MDS Server as a
|
|
CEPH_MDS_OP_MKSNAP-tagged `MClientRequest`, and initially handled in
|
|
Server::handle_client_mksnap(). It allocates a `snapid` from the `SnapServer`,
|
|
projects a new inode with the new SnapRealm, and commits it to the MDLog as
|
|
usual. When committed, it invokes
|
|
`MDCache::do_realm_invalidate_and_update_notify()`, which triggers most of the
|
|
real work of the snapshot.
|
|
|
|
If there were already snapshots above directory "foo" (rooted at "/1", say),
|
|
the new SnapRealm adds its most immediate ancestor as a `past_parent` on
|
|
creation. After committing to the MDLog, all clients with caps on files in
|
|
"/1/2/3/foo/" are notified (MDCache::send_snaps()) of the new SnapRealm, and
|
|
update the `SnapContext` they are using with that data. Note that this
|
|
*is not* a synchronous part of the snapshot creation!
|
|
|
|
Updating a snapshot
|
|
-------------------
|
|
If you delete a snapshot, or move data out of the parent snapshot's hierarchy,
|
|
a similar process is followed. Extra code paths check to see if we can break
|
|
the `past_parent` links between SnapRealms, or eliminate them entirely.
|
|
|
|
Generating a SnapContext
|
|
------------------------
|
|
A RADOS `SnapContext` consists of a snapshot sequence ID (`snapid`) and all
|
|
the snapshot IDs that an object is already part of. To generate that list, we
|
|
generate a list of all `snapids` associated with the SnapRealm and all its
|
|
`past_parents`.
|
|
|
|
Storing snapshot data
|
|
---------------------
|
|
File data is stored in RADOS "self-managed" snapshots. Clients are careful to
|
|
use the correct `SnapContext` when writing file data to the OSDs.
|
|
|
|
Storing snapshot metadata
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
Snapshotted dentries (and their inodes) are stored in-line as part of the
|
|
directory they were in at the time of the snapshot. *All dentries* include a
|
|
`first` and `last` snapid for which they are valid. (Non-snapshotted dentries
|
|
will have their `last` set to CEPH_NOSNAP).
|
|
|
|
Snapshot writeback
|
|
------------------
|
|
There is a great deal of code to handle writeback efficiently. When a Client
|
|
receives an `MClientSnap` message, it updates the local `SnapRealm`
|
|
representation and its links to specific `Inodes`, and generates a `CapSnap`
|
|
for the `Inode`. The `CapSnap` is flushed out as part of capability writeback,
|
|
and if there is dirty data the `CapSnap` is used to block fresh data writes
|
|
until the snapshot is completely flushed to the OSDs.
|
|
|
|
In the MDS, we generate snapshot-representing dentries as part of the regular
|
|
process for flushing them. Dentries with outstanding `CapSnap` data is kept
|
|
pinned and in the journal.
|
|
|
|
Deleting snapshots
|
|
------------------
|
|
Snapshots are deleted by invoking "rmdir" on the ".snap" directory they are
|
|
rooted in. (Attempts to delete a directory which roots snapshots *will fail*;
|
|
you must delete the snapshots first.) Once deleted, they are entered into the
|
|
`OSDMap` list of deleted snapshots and the file data is removed by the OSDs.
|
|
Metadata is cleaned up as the directory objects are read in and written back
|
|
out again.
|
|
|
|
Hard links
|
|
----------
|
|
Hard links do not interact well with snapshots. A file is snapshotted when its
|
|
primary link is part of a SnapRealm; other links *will not* preserve data.
|
|
Generally the location where a file was first created will be its primary link,
|
|
but if the original link has been deleted it is not easy (nor always
|
|
determnistic) to find which link is now the primary.
|
|
|
|
Multi-FS
|
|
---------
|
|
Snapshots and multiiple filesystems don't interact well. Specifically, each
|
|
MDS cluster allocates `snapids` independently; if you have multiple filesystems
|
|
sharing a single pool (via namespaces), their snapshots *will* collide and
|
|
deleting one will result in missing file data for others. (This may even be
|
|
invisible, not throwing errors to the user.) If each FS gets its own
|
|
pool things probably work, but this isn't tested and may not be true.
|