ceph/doc/config-cluster/file-system-recommendations.rst
Tommi Virtanen 5465e81097 doc: Whitespace cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Tommi Virtanen <tommi.virtanen@dreamhost.com>
2012-05-03 10:15:21 -07:00

52 lines
2.2 KiB
ReStructuredText

=========================================
Hard Disk and File System Recommendations
=========================================
Ceph aims for data safety, which means that when the application receives notice
that data was written to the disk, that data was actually written to the disk.
For old kernels (<2.6.33), disable the write cache if the journal is on a raw
disk. Newer kernels should work fine.
Use ``hdparm`` to disable write caching on the hard disk::
$ hdparm -W 0 /dev/hda 0
Ceph OSDs depend on the Extended Attributes (XATTRs) of the underlying file
system for:
- Internal object state
- Snapshot metadata
- RADOS Gateway Access Control Lists (ACLs).
Ceph OSDs rely heavily upon the stability and performance of the underlying file
system. The underlying file system must provide sufficient capacity for XATTRs.
File system candidates for Ceph include B tree and B+ tree file systems such as:
- ``btrfs``
- ``XFS``
If you are using ``ext4``, enable XATTRs. ::
filestore xattr use omap = true
.. warning:: XATTR limits.
The RADOS Gateway's ACL and Ceph snapshots easily surpass the 4-kilobyte limit
for XATTRs in ``ext4``, causing the ``ceph-osd`` process to crash. Version 0.45
or newer uses ``leveldb`` to bypass this limitation. ``ext4`` is a poor file
system choice if you intend to deploy the RADOS Gateway or use snapshots on
versions earlier than 0.45.
.. tip:: Use ``xfs`` initially and ``btrfs`` when it is ready for production.
The Ceph team believes that the best performance and stability will come from
``btrfs.`` The ``btrfs`` file system has internal transactions that keep the
local data set in a consistent state. This makes OSDs based on ``btrfs`` simple
to deploy, while providing scalability not currently available from block-based
file systems. The 64-kb XATTR limit for ``xfs`` XATTRS is enough to accommodate
RDB snapshot metadata and RADOS Gateway ACLs. So ``xfs`` is the second-choice
file system of the Ceph team in the long run, but ``xfs`` is currently more
stable than ``btrfs``. If you only plan to use RADOS and ``rbd`` without
snapshots and without ``radosgw``, the ``ext4`` file system should work just fine.