mirror of
https://github.com/ceph/ceph
synced 2024-12-30 07:23:11 +00:00
afe657c2fe
Drop the output of pg query from the doc, as it is: * Very old. The doc has only one-fourth of the latest 'pg query' output. * Updating the latest 'pg query' output in the doc would be huge. * too difficult to maintain it in the doc and make it sync with the changes of the actual 'pg query' output. However, we can insert parts of the output in the doc if necessary. Signed-off-by: Jos Collin <jcollin@redhat.com>
510 lines
22 KiB
ReStructuredText
510 lines
22 KiB
ReStructuredText
=========================
|
||
Monitoring OSDs and PGs
|
||
=========================
|
||
|
||
High availability and high reliability require a fault-tolerant approach to
|
||
managing hardware and software issues. Ceph has no single point-of-failure, and
|
||
can service requests for data in a "degraded" mode. Ceph's `data placement`_
|
||
introduces a layer of indirection to ensure that data doesn't bind directly to
|
||
particular OSD addresses. This means that tracking down system faults requires
|
||
finding the `placement group`_ and the underlying OSDs at root of the problem.
|
||
|
||
.. tip:: A fault in one part of the cluster may prevent you from accessing a
|
||
particular object, but that doesn't mean that you cannot access other objects.
|
||
When you run into a fault, don't panic. Just follow the steps for monitoring
|
||
your OSDs and placement groups. Then, begin troubleshooting.
|
||
|
||
Ceph is generally self-repairing. However, when problems persist, monitoring
|
||
OSDs and placement groups will help you identify the problem.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Monitoring OSDs
|
||
===============
|
||
|
||
An OSD's status is either in the cluster (``in``) or out of the cluster
|
||
(``out``); and, it is either up and running (``up``), or it is down and not
|
||
running (``down``). If an OSD is ``up``, it may be either ``in`` the cluster
|
||
(you can read and write data) or it is ``out`` of the cluster. If it was
|
||
``in`` the cluster and recently moved ``out`` of the cluster, Ceph will migrate
|
||
placement groups to other OSDs. If an OSD is ``out`` of the cluster, CRUSH will
|
||
not assign placement groups to the OSD. If an OSD is ``down``, it should also be
|
||
``out``.
|
||
|
||
.. note:: If an OSD is ``down`` and ``in``, there is a problem and the cluster
|
||
will not be in a healthy state.
|
||
|
||
.. ditaa:: +----------------+ +----------------+
|
||
| | | |
|
||
| OSD #n In | | OSD #n Up |
|
||
| | | |
|
||
+----------------+ +----------------+
|
||
^ ^
|
||
| |
|
||
| |
|
||
v v
|
||
+----------------+ +----------------+
|
||
| | | |
|
||
| OSD #n Out | | OSD #n Down |
|
||
| | | |
|
||
+----------------+ +----------------+
|
||
|
||
If you execute a command such as ``ceph health``, ``ceph -s`` or ``ceph -w``,
|
||
you may notice that the cluster does not always echo back ``HEALTH OK``. Don't
|
||
panic. With respect to OSDs, you should expect that the cluster will **NOT**
|
||
echo ``HEALTH OK`` in a few expected circumstances:
|
||
|
||
#. You haven't started the cluster yet (it won't respond).
|
||
#. You have just started or restarted the cluster and it's not ready yet,
|
||
because the placement groups are getting created and the OSDs are in
|
||
the process of peering.
|
||
#. You just added or removed an OSD.
|
||
#. You just have modified your cluster map.
|
||
|
||
An important aspect of monitoring OSDs is to ensure that when the cluster
|
||
is up and running that all OSDs that are ``in`` the cluster are ``up`` and
|
||
running, too. To see if all OSDs are running, execute::
|
||
|
||
ceph osd stat
|
||
|
||
The result should tell you the total number of OSDs (x),
|
||
how many are ``up`` (y), how many are ``in`` (z) and the map epoch (eNNNN). ::
|
||
|
||
x osds: y up, z in; epoch: eNNNN
|
||
|
||
If the number of OSDs that are ``in`` the cluster is more than the number of
|
||
OSDs that are ``up``, execute the following command to identify the ``ceph-osd``
|
||
daemons that are not running::
|
||
|
||
ceph osd tree
|
||
|
||
::
|
||
|
||
#ID CLASS WEIGHT TYPE NAME STATUS REWEIGHT PRI-AFF
|
||
-1 2.00000 pool openstack
|
||
-3 2.00000 rack dell-2950-rack-A
|
||
-2 2.00000 host dell-2950-A1
|
||
0 ssd 1.00000 osd.0 up 1.00000 1.00000
|
||
1 ssd 1.00000 osd.1 down 1.00000 1.00000
|
||
|
||
.. tip:: The ability to search through a well-designed CRUSH hierarchy may help
|
||
you troubleshoot your cluster by identifying the physcial locations faster.
|
||
|
||
If an OSD is ``down``, start it::
|
||
|
||
sudo systemctl start ceph-osd@1
|
||
|
||
See `OSD Not Running`_ for problems associated with OSDs that stopped, or won't
|
||
restart.
|
||
|
||
|
||
PG Sets
|
||
=======
|
||
|
||
When CRUSH assigns placement groups to OSDs, it looks at the number of replicas
|
||
for the pool and assigns the placement group to OSDs such that each replica of
|
||
the placement group gets assigned to a different OSD. For example, if the pool
|
||
requires three replicas of a placement group, CRUSH may assign them to
|
||
``osd.1``, ``osd.2`` and ``osd.3`` respectively. CRUSH actually seeks a
|
||
pseudo-random placement that will take into account failure domains you set in
|
||
your `CRUSH map`_, so you will rarely see placement groups assigned to nearest
|
||
neighbor OSDs in a large cluster. We refer to the set of OSDs that should
|
||
contain the replicas of a particular placement group as the **Acting Set**. In
|
||
some cases, an OSD in the Acting Set is ``down`` or otherwise not able to
|
||
service requests for objects in the placement group. When these situations
|
||
arise, don't panic. Common examples include:
|
||
|
||
- You added or removed an OSD. Then, CRUSH reassigned the placement group to
|
||
other OSDs--thereby changing the composition of the Acting Set and spawning
|
||
the migration of data with a "backfill" process.
|
||
- An OSD was ``down``, was restarted, and is now ``recovering``.
|
||
- An OSD in the Acting Set is ``down`` or unable to service requests,
|
||
and another OSD has temporarily assumed its duties.
|
||
|
||
Ceph processes a client request using the **Up Set**, which is the set of OSDs
|
||
that will actually handle the requests. In most cases, the Up Set and the Acting
|
||
Set are virtually identical. When they are not, it may indicate that Ceph is
|
||
migrating data, an OSD is recovering, or that there is a problem (i.e., Ceph
|
||
usually echoes a "HEALTH WARN" state with a "stuck stale" message in such
|
||
scenarios).
|
||
|
||
To retrieve a list of placement groups, execute::
|
||
|
||
ceph pg dump
|
||
|
||
To view which OSDs are within the Acting Set or the Up Set for a given placement
|
||
group, execute::
|
||
|
||
ceph pg map {pg-num}
|
||
|
||
The result should tell you the osdmap epoch (eNNN), the placement group number
|
||
({pg-num}), the OSDs in the Up Set (up[]), and the OSDs in the acting set
|
||
(acting[]). ::
|
||
|
||
osdmap eNNN pg {raw-pg-num} ({pg-num}) -> up [0,1,2] acting [0,1,2]
|
||
|
||
.. note:: If the Up Set and Acting Set do not match, this may be an indicator
|
||
that the cluster rebalancing itself or of a potential problem with
|
||
the cluster.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Peering
|
||
=======
|
||
|
||
Before you can write data to a placement group, it must be in an ``active``
|
||
state, and it **should** be in a ``clean`` state. For Ceph to determine the
|
||
current state of a placement group, the primary OSD of the placement group
|
||
(i.e., the first OSD in the acting set), peers with the secondary and tertiary
|
||
OSDs to establish agreement on the current state of the placement group
|
||
(assuming a pool with 3 replicas of the PG).
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. ditaa:: +---------+ +---------+ +-------+
|
||
| OSD 1 | | OSD 2 | | OSD 3 |
|
||
+---------+ +---------+ +-------+
|
||
| | |
|
||
| Request To | |
|
||
| Peer | |
|
||
|-------------->| |
|
||
|<--------------| |
|
||
| Peering |
|
||
| |
|
||
| Request To |
|
||
| Peer |
|
||
|----------------------------->|
|
||
|<-----------------------------|
|
||
| Peering |
|
||
|
||
The OSDs also report their status to the monitor. See `Configuring Monitor/OSD
|
||
Interaction`_ for details. To troubleshoot peering issues, see `Peering
|
||
Failure`_.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Monitoring Placement Group States
|
||
=================================
|
||
|
||
If you execute a command such as ``ceph health``, ``ceph -s`` or ``ceph -w``,
|
||
you may notice that the cluster does not always echo back ``HEALTH OK``. After
|
||
you check to see if the OSDs are running, you should also check placement group
|
||
states. You should expect that the cluster will **NOT** echo ``HEALTH OK`` in a
|
||
number of placement group peering-related circumstances:
|
||
|
||
#. You have just created a pool and placement groups haven't peered yet.
|
||
#. The placement groups are recovering.
|
||
#. You have just added an OSD to or removed an OSD from the cluster.
|
||
#. You have just modified your CRUSH map and your placement groups are migrating.
|
||
#. There is inconsistent data in different replicas of a placement group.
|
||
#. Ceph is scrubbing a placement group's replicas.
|
||
#. Ceph doesn't have enough storage capacity to complete backfilling operations.
|
||
|
||
If one of the foregoing circumstances causes Ceph to echo ``HEALTH WARN``, don't
|
||
panic. In many cases, the cluster will recover on its own. In some cases, you
|
||
may need to take action. An important aspect of monitoring placement groups is
|
||
to ensure that when the cluster is up and running that all placement groups are
|
||
``active``, and preferably in the ``clean`` state. To see the status of all
|
||
placement groups, execute::
|
||
|
||
ceph pg stat
|
||
|
||
The result should tell you the total number of placement groups (x), how many
|
||
placement groups are in a particular state such as ``active+clean`` (y) and the
|
||
amount of data stored (z). ::
|
||
|
||
x pgs: y active+clean; z bytes data, aa MB used, bb GB / cc GB avail
|
||
|
||
.. note:: It is common for Ceph to report multiple states for placement groups.
|
||
|
||
In addition to the placement group states, Ceph will also echo back the amount of
|
||
storage capacity used (aa), the amount of storage capacity remaining (bb), and the total
|
||
storage capacity for the placement group. These numbers can be important in a
|
||
few cases:
|
||
|
||
- You are reaching your ``near full ratio`` or ``full ratio``.
|
||
- Your data is not getting distributed across the cluster due to an
|
||
error in your CRUSH configuration.
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. topic:: Placement Group IDs
|
||
|
||
Placement group IDs consist of the pool number (not pool name) followed
|
||
by a period (.) and the placement group ID--a hexadecimal number. You
|
||
can view pool numbers and their names from the output of ``ceph osd
|
||
lspools``. For example, the default pool ``rbd`` corresponds to
|
||
pool number ``0``. A fully qualified placement group ID has the
|
||
following form::
|
||
|
||
{pool-num}.{pg-id}
|
||
|
||
And it typically looks like this::
|
||
|
||
0.1f
|
||
|
||
|
||
To retrieve a list of placement groups, execute the following::
|
||
|
||
ceph pg dump
|
||
|
||
You can also format the output in JSON format and save it to a file::
|
||
|
||
ceph pg dump -o {filename} --format=json
|
||
|
||
To query a particular placement group, execute the following::
|
||
|
||
ceph pg {poolnum}.{pg-id} query
|
||
|
||
Ceph will output the query in JSON format.
|
||
|
||
The following subsections describe the common pg states in detail.
|
||
|
||
Creating
|
||
--------
|
||
|
||
When you create a pool, it will create the number of placement groups you
|
||
specified. Ceph will echo ``creating`` when it is creating one or more
|
||
placement groups. Once they are created, the OSDs that are part of a placement
|
||
group's Acting Set will peer. Once peering is complete, the placement group
|
||
status should be ``active+clean``, which means a Ceph client can begin writing
|
||
to the placement group.
|
||
|
||
.. ditaa::
|
||
|
||
/-----------\ /-----------\ /-----------\
|
||
| Creating |------>| Peering |------>| Active |
|
||
\-----------/ \-----------/ \-----------/
|
||
|
||
Peering
|
||
-------
|
||
|
||
When Ceph is Peering a placement group, Ceph is bringing the OSDs that
|
||
store the replicas of the placement group into **agreement about the state**
|
||
of the objects and metadata in the placement group. When Ceph completes peering,
|
||
this means that the OSDs that store the placement group agree about the current
|
||
state of the placement group. However, completion of the peering process does
|
||
**NOT** mean that each replica has the latest contents.
|
||
|
||
.. topic:: Authoratative History
|
||
|
||
Ceph will **NOT** acknowledge a write operation to a client, until
|
||
all OSDs of the acting set persist the write operation. This practice
|
||
ensures that at least one member of the acting set will have a record
|
||
of every acknowledged write operation since the last successful
|
||
peering operation.
|
||
|
||
With an accurate record of each acknowledged write operation, Ceph can
|
||
construct and disseminate a new authoritative history of the placement
|
||
group--a complete, and fully ordered set of operations that, if performed,
|
||
would bring an OSD’s copy of a placement group up to date.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Active
|
||
------
|
||
|
||
Once Ceph completes the peering process, a placement group may become
|
||
``active``. The ``active`` state means that the data in the placement group is
|
||
generally available in the primary placement group and the replicas for read
|
||
and write operations.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Clean
|
||
-----
|
||
|
||
When a placement group is in the ``clean`` state, the primary OSD and the
|
||
replica OSDs have successfully peered and there are no stray replicas for the
|
||
placement group. Ceph replicated all objects in the placement group the correct
|
||
number of times.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Degraded
|
||
--------
|
||
|
||
When a client writes an object to the primary OSD, the primary OSD is
|
||
responsible for writing the replicas to the replica OSDs. After the primary OSD
|
||
writes the object to storage, the placement group will remain in a ``degraded``
|
||
state until the primary OSD has received an acknowledgement from the replica
|
||
OSDs that Ceph created the replica objects successfully.
|
||
|
||
The reason a placement group can be ``active+degraded`` is that an OSD may be
|
||
``active`` even though it doesn't hold all of the objects yet. If an OSD goes
|
||
``down``, Ceph marks each placement group assigned to the OSD as ``degraded``.
|
||
The OSDs must peer again when the OSD comes back online. However, a client can
|
||
still write a new object to a ``degraded`` placement group if it is ``active``.
|
||
|
||
If an OSD is ``down`` and the ``degraded`` condition persists, Ceph may mark the
|
||
``down`` OSD as ``out`` of the cluster and remap the data from the ``down`` OSD
|
||
to another OSD. The time between being marked ``down`` and being marked ``out``
|
||
is controlled by ``mon osd down out interval``, which is set to ``600`` seconds
|
||
by default.
|
||
|
||
A placement group can also be ``degraded``, because Ceph cannot find one or more
|
||
objects that Ceph thinks should be in the placement group. While you cannot
|
||
read or write to unfound objects, you can still access all of the other objects
|
||
in the ``degraded`` placement group.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Recovering
|
||
----------
|
||
|
||
Ceph was designed for fault-tolerance at a scale where hardware and software
|
||
problems are ongoing. When an OSD goes ``down``, its contents may fall behind
|
||
the current state of other replicas in the placement groups. When the OSD is
|
||
back ``up``, the contents of the placement groups must be updated to reflect the
|
||
current state. During that time period, the OSD may reflect a ``recovering``
|
||
state.
|
||
|
||
Recovery is not always trivial, because a hardware failure might cause a
|
||
cascading failure of multiple OSDs. For example, a network switch for a rack or
|
||
cabinet may fail, which can cause the OSDs of a number of host machines to fall
|
||
behind the current state of the cluster. Each one of the OSDs must recover once
|
||
the fault is resolved.
|
||
|
||
Ceph provides a number of settings to balance the resource contention between
|
||
new service requests and the need to recover data objects and restore the
|
||
placement groups to the current state. The ``osd recovery delay start`` setting
|
||
allows an OSD to restart, re-peer and even process some replay requests before
|
||
starting the recovery process. The ``osd
|
||
recovery thread timeout`` sets a thread timeout, because multiple OSDs may fail,
|
||
restart and re-peer at staggered rates. The ``osd recovery max active`` setting
|
||
limits the number of recovery requests an OSD will entertain simultaneously to
|
||
prevent the OSD from failing to serve . The ``osd recovery max chunk`` setting
|
||
limits the size of the recovered data chunks to prevent network congestion.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Back Filling
|
||
------------
|
||
|
||
When a new OSD joins the cluster, CRUSH will reassign placement groups from OSDs
|
||
in the cluster to the newly added OSD. Forcing the new OSD to accept the
|
||
reassigned placement groups immediately can put excessive load on the new OSD.
|
||
Back filling the OSD with the placement groups allows this process to begin in
|
||
the background. Once backfilling is complete, the new OSD will begin serving
|
||
requests when it is ready.
|
||
|
||
During the backfill operations, you may see one of several states:
|
||
``backfill_wait`` indicates that a backfill operation is pending, but is not
|
||
underway yet; ``backfill`` indicates that a backfill operation is underway;
|
||
and, ``backfill_too_full`` indicates that a backfill operation was requested,
|
||
but couldn't be completed due to insufficient storage capacity. When a
|
||
placement group cannot be backfilled, it may be considered ``incomplete``.
|
||
|
||
Ceph provides a number of settings to manage the load spike associated with
|
||
reassigning placement groups to an OSD (especially a new OSD). By default,
|
||
``osd_max_backfills`` sets the maximum number of concurrent backfills to or from
|
||
an OSD to 10. The ``backfill full ratio`` enables an OSD to refuse a
|
||
backfill request if the OSD is approaching its full ratio (90%, by default) and
|
||
change with ``ceph osd set-backfillfull-ratio`` comand.
|
||
If an OSD refuses a backfill request, the ``osd backfill retry interval``
|
||
enables an OSD to retry the request (after 10 seconds, by default). OSDs can
|
||
also set ``osd backfill scan min`` and ``osd backfill scan max`` to manage scan
|
||
intervals (64 and 512, by default).
|
||
|
||
|
||
Remapped
|
||
--------
|
||
|
||
When the Acting Set that services a placement group changes, the data migrates
|
||
from the old acting set to the new acting set. It may take some time for a new
|
||
primary OSD to service requests. So it may ask the old primary to continue to
|
||
service requests until the placement group migration is complete. Once data
|
||
migration completes, the mapping uses the primary OSD of the new acting set.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Stale
|
||
-----
|
||
|
||
While Ceph uses heartbeats to ensure that hosts and daemons are running, the
|
||
``ceph-osd`` daemons may also get into a ``stuck`` state where they are not
|
||
reporting statistics in a timely manner (e.g., a temporary network fault). By
|
||
default, OSD daemons report their placement group, up thru, boot and failure
|
||
statistics every half second (i.e., ``0.5``), which is more frequent than the
|
||
heartbeat thresholds. If the **Primary OSD** of a placement group's acting set
|
||
fails to report to the monitor or if other OSDs have reported the primary OSD
|
||
``down``, the monitors will mark the placement group ``stale``.
|
||
|
||
When you start your cluster, it is common to see the ``stale`` state until
|
||
the peering process completes. After your cluster has been running for awhile,
|
||
seeing placement groups in the ``stale`` state indicates that the primary OSD
|
||
for those placement groups is ``down`` or not reporting placement group statistics
|
||
to the monitor.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Identifying Troubled PGs
|
||
========================
|
||
|
||
As previously noted, a placement group is not necessarily problematic just
|
||
because its state is not ``active+clean``. Generally, Ceph's ability to self
|
||
repair may not be working when placement groups get stuck. The stuck states
|
||
include:
|
||
|
||
- **Unclean**: Placement groups contain objects that are not replicated the
|
||
desired number of times. They should be recovering.
|
||
- **Inactive**: Placement groups cannot process reads or writes because they
|
||
are waiting for an OSD with the most up-to-date data to come back ``up``.
|
||
- **Stale**: Placement groups are in an unknown state, because the OSDs that
|
||
host them have not reported to the monitor cluster in a while (configured
|
||
by ``mon osd report timeout``).
|
||
|
||
To identify stuck placement groups, execute the following::
|
||
|
||
ceph pg dump_stuck [unclean|inactive|stale|undersized|degraded]
|
||
|
||
See `Placement Group Subsystem`_ for additional details. To troubleshoot
|
||
stuck placement groups, see `Troubleshooting PG Errors`_.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Finding an Object Location
|
||
==========================
|
||
|
||
To store object data in the Ceph Object Store, a Ceph client must:
|
||
|
||
#. Set an object name
|
||
#. Specify a `pool`_
|
||
|
||
The Ceph client retrieves the latest cluster map and the CRUSH algorithm
|
||
calculates how to map the object to a `placement group`_, and then calculates
|
||
how to assign the placement group to an OSD dynamically. To find the object
|
||
location, all you need is the object name and the pool name. For example::
|
||
|
||
ceph osd map {poolname} {object-name} [namespace]
|
||
|
||
.. topic:: Exercise: Locate an Object
|
||
|
||
As an exercise, lets create an object. Specify an object name, a path to a
|
||
test file containing some object data and a pool name using the
|
||
``rados put`` command on the command line. For example::
|
||
|
||
rados put {object-name} {file-path} --pool=data
|
||
rados put test-object-1 testfile.txt --pool=data
|
||
|
||
To verify that the Ceph Object Store stored the object, execute the following::
|
||
|
||
rados -p data ls
|
||
|
||
Now, identify the object location::
|
||
|
||
ceph osd map {pool-name} {object-name}
|
||
ceph osd map data test-object-1
|
||
|
||
Ceph should output the object's location. For example::
|
||
|
||
osdmap e537 pool 'data' (0) object 'test-object-1' -> pg 0.d1743484 (0.4) -> up ([1,0], p0) acting ([1,0], p0)
|
||
|
||
To remove the test object, simply delete it using the ``rados rm`` command.
|
||
For example::
|
||
|
||
rados rm test-object-1 --pool=data
|
||
|
||
|
||
As the cluster evolves, the object location may change dynamically. One benefit
|
||
of Ceph's dynamic rebalancing is that Ceph relieves you from having to perform
|
||
the migration manually. See the `Architecture`_ section for details.
|
||
|
||
.. _data placement: ../data-placement
|
||
.. _pool: ../pools
|
||
.. _placement group: ../placement-groups
|
||
.. _Architecture: ../../../architecture
|
||
.. _OSD Not Running: ../../troubleshooting/troubleshooting-osd#osd-not-running
|
||
.. _Troubleshooting PG Errors: ../../troubleshooting/troubleshooting-pg#troubleshooting-pg-errors
|
||
.. _Peering Failure: ../../troubleshooting/troubleshooting-pg#failures-osd-peering
|
||
.. _CRUSH map: ../crush-map
|
||
.. _Configuring Monitor/OSD Interaction: ../../configuration/mon-osd-interaction/
|
||
.. _Placement Group Subsystem: ../control#placement-group-subsystem
|