'rados cppool' copies the contents but that doesn't make the destination
pool an unmanaged snaps pool. Therefore, we must get an ENOTSUP when
we try to remove an unmanaged snap from a not-unmanaged pool.
Signed-off-by: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao.luis@inktank.com>
Prevent creation of buckets of type 0 ('osd', 'device', etc.), as they
will confusing the mapping algorithm.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Basic testing by forcing each monitor out of quorum at a time and making
sure they still reply to ping requests.
Fixes: #6705
Signed-off-by: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao.luis@inktank.com>
The adjust method returns a count of adjusted items.
Add a test.
Fixes: #6382
Backport: dumpling
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com>
When using the properties key=value only, the test was inverted
and an attempt to obtain a substring at index string::npos throws
an exception.
Add variations of osd pool create to qa/workunits/mon/pool_ops.sh
to assert the problem has been fixed and all code paths are used.
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/6357fixes#6357
Signed-off-by: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
set env var TEST_EXIT_ON_ERROR=0 to obtain all errors instead of exiting
with return 1 on first error found.
Signed-off-by: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao.luis@inktank.com>
If we add an item that already exists in particular position, we should
update instead of inserting it; the CrushWrapper methods are not
idempotent.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
The '! command' doesn't fail properly, even with -e, in bash (wtf!).
Also, the last pool deletion command succeeds because the pool
'--yes-i-really-really-mean-it' doesn't exist. So drop that test.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
The files from the ceph-test subpackage are installed to /usr/bin,
give them more useful names to make sure that the user know they
belong to ceph. add a 'ceph_' prefix and change some test* binaries
to ceph_test_*.
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Use ! for clarity when commands are supposed to fail.
Check a few other cases that should fail, and correct deleting
non-existent pools.
Signed-off-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Require that the pool name be passed twice along with an force option
before we irreversibly delete an entire pool of objects.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
The default of 8 is virtually never the right answer. Require the initial
pg count to be explicitly provided.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
