Prefer prefix ++operator for non-primitive types like iterators for
performance reasons. Prefix ++/-- operators avoid creating a temporary
copy.
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Use empty() since it should be prefered as it has, following the
standard, a constant time complexity regardless of the containter
type. The same is not guaranteed for size().
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Prefer prefix ++operator for non-primitive types like iterators for
performance reasons. Prefix ++/-- operators avoid creating a temporary
copy.
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Prefer prefix ++operator for non-primitive types like iterators for
performance reasons. Prefix ++/-- operators avoid creating a temporary
copy.
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Prefer prefix ++operator for non-primitive types like iterators for
performance reasons. Prefix ++/-- operators avoid creating a temporary
copy.
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Prefer prefix ++operator for non-primitive types like iterators for
performance reasons. Prefix ++/-- operators avoid creating a temporary
copy.
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Prefer prefix ++operator for non-primitive types like iterators for
performance reasons. Prefix ++/-- operators avoid creating a temporary
copy.
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Fixes: #6678
We don't want to allow regular users to write to secondary zones,
otherwise we'd end up with data inconsistencies.
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@inktank.com>
Formerly, if sentries is empty, we skip missing. In general,
we need to continue adding items from missing until we get
to next (returned from collection_list_partial) to avoid
missing any objects.
Fixes: #6633
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: David Zafman <david.zafman@inktank.com>
Selects __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ or __func__. Linux assumes GNU, and chooses
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ if gcc/g++ versions are favorable.
This also includes a fix in ax_c_var_func.m4:
AC_TRY_COMPILE will wrap the test in main{}, and then GCC will complain
about nested functions. Just use the original main{} body.
diff --git a/m4/ax_c_var_func.m4 b/m4/ax_c_var_func.m4
index 0ad7d2b..8b57563 100644
--- a/m4/ax_c_var_func.m4
+++ b/m4/ax_c_var_func.m4
@@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ AC_DEFUN([AX_C_VAR_FUNC],
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CC])
AC_CACHE_CHECK(whether $CC recognizes __func__, ac_cv_c_var_func,
AC_TRY_COMPILE(,
-[int main() {
+[
char *s = __func__;
-}],
+],
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_FUNC,,
[Define if the C complier supports __func__]) ac_cv_c_var_func=yes,
ac_cv_c_var_func=no) )
Signed-off-by: Noah Watkins <noahwatkins@gmail.com>
googletest does not support death tests on FreeBSD. I've submitted a
patch upstream that trivially enables support, but in the meantime we
can't compile death tests for Ceph on FreeBSD.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/googletestframework/tjY6UjWgNOw
Signed-off-by: Alan Somers <asomers@gmail.com>
Split may cause holes such that head != tail and yet
log.empty().
Fixes: #6722
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: David Zafman <david.zafman@inktank.com>
Due to split, there may be a hole at newhead.
Fixes: #6722
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: David Zafman <david.zafman@inktank.com>
