Back in 2013 xfstests were rearranged, which also changed the way
./check parses test lists. Catch up with those changes. Note that
tests can no longer be listed in ranges, we only accept individual
tests and test groups (e.g. -g quick).
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@inktank.com>
This test attempts to generate a random number of holes within a
particular range, but may fail because hole placement is random.
Signed-off-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Tests were rearranged upstream; use an old version for the time being
until we can refactor run_xfstests.sh to cope. See #6385
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
These tests are showing intermittent failures so we'll drop them
from the default list for the time being.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
I've gone through the set of xfstests that were previously found to
not work. Some of those now do work, and with the addition of an
option to pass to "mkfs.xfs" a large number of other tests now
produce expected output as well.
This patch updates the default list of tests to run to reflect
the result of this exercise. The following 50 additional tests
are now run by default:
029 074 078 084-087 100 105 117 121 124 126 129-134
164 165 167 174 181 184 186 187 192 214-216 227 236
237 241 243 245-249 257-259 261 277 278 280 285 286
Test 127 completed without error, but it took from 1-3 hours so I
kept that out of the list.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
This adds a "-c <count>" option to the run_xfstests.sh script so
the full set of tests can be repeated more than once without having
to go through the setup process each time.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com>
Stop the qa noise we fix#2410. Looks like a freeze/thaw thing.
Maybe Jan's new freeze/thaw code will address this? That's probably
wishful thinking.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Test 232 in the xfstests suite produces an XFS error in the log
when run over an RBD device. This is most likely an XFS problem
that will be tracked separately (in tracker 2302).
My original plan with getting this checked in was to have it run a
baseline set of the tests--all known to pass on rbd devices--with
the intention of doing ongoing work to add back missing tests (at
least from the "auto" group) as we understand and fix whatever
makes them produce failures.
So just comment out test 232 so the xfstests script is able to
run to completion without error.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@dreamhost.com>
Because we exit on any error (due to 'set -e'), the cleanup call was
never getting made in the event of an error. The net effect of that
was that a filesystem could be left mounted, and rbd cleanup then
couldn't complete because the module was in use.
Fix the trap call so it calls cleanup on exit as well as error.
Switch to using the capitalized signal names in the call.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@dreamhost.com>
It turns out that xfstests *does* exit with non-zero status
when a test fails. Its exit status is the number of tests
that failed (which, now that we have over 255 tests could be
an issue...)
Save the exit status and make it be the result of the run.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@dreamhost.com
Add a script that runs xfstests over a pair of devices that are
specified using command line arguments. The tests are run using
a specified filesystem type (xfs, ext4, or btrfs).
A default set of tests is run if none is specified on the command
line. Normally there's an "auto" group used for this purpose, but
for now I've laid out a (large) subset of them that I know pass on
rbd devices. These can be updated as we find they work reliably.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@dreamhost.com>
