ruleset is not used after merging below patch
commit f9a095deb1e74642d88bc9015684b0be113cc5f9
crush: s/ruleset/id/ in decompiled output
Moving away from the 'ruleset' terminology.
Signed-off-by: Changcheng Liu <changcheng.liu@intel.com>
* refs/pull/24502/head:
crushtool: implement --rebuild-class-roots command
crushtool: make --reweight re-sum choose_args weight-sets too
crushtool: --reweight should only reweight nonshadow roots
crush/CrushWrapper: reclassify: use default parent for created buckets
crush/CrushWrapper: reclassify: handle to-be-created buckets that we need twice
test/cli/crushtool/reclassify: add second gabe test case
crushtool: add --set-subtree-class; do not set class via --reclassify-root
test/cli/crushtool/reclassify: add reclassify test cases
doc/rados/operations/crush*: document reclassify
doc/rados/operations/crush: remove instructions for separate crush trees for ssd
crushtool: add --compare command
crushtool: implement --reclassify
crush/CrushCompiler: fix id scan to include class ids
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <jdurgin@redhat.com>
Sometimes we don't want the --reclassify-root to set the class of every
device because a small number of them are (correctly) a different class.
Allow both behaviors by adding a new, separate command to set the class
of all devices beneath a point in the hierarchy and do not implicitly do
that relabeling as part of --reclassify-root.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Since kraken, Ceph enforces a 1:1 correspondence between CRUSH ruleset and
CRUSH rule, so effectively ruleset and rule are the same thing, although
the term "ruleset" still survives - notably in the CRUSH rule itself, where it
effectively denotes the number of the rule.
This commit updates the documentation to more faithfully reflect the current
state of the code.
Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20559
Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
