diff --git a/doc/dev/osd_internals/erasure_coding.rst b/doc/dev/osd_internals/erasure_coding.rst index f9c34671569..f81453d6825 100644 --- a/doc/dev/osd_internals/erasure_coding.rst +++ b/doc/dev/osd_internals/erasure_coding.rst @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ PGBackend interfaces: - recoverable() - recover_object() -Backfill +`Backfill `_ -------- For the most part, backfill itself should behave similarly between @@ -292,14 +292,17 @@ replicated and erasure coded pools with a few exceptions: temporary pg chunk for that acting set slot. For 2, we don't really need to place the backfill peer in the acting -set for replicated PGs anyway. For 1, PGBackend::choose_backfill() -should determine which osds are backfilled in a particular interval. +set for replicated PGs anyway. +For 1, PGBackend::choose_backfill() should determine which osds are +backfilled in a particular interval. Core changes: -- Backfill should be capable of handling multiple backfill peers - concurrently even for replicated pgs (easier to test for now) -- Backfill peers should not be placed in the acting set. +- Backfill should be capable of `handling multiple backfill peers + concurrently `_ even for + replicated pgs (easier to test for now) +- `Backfill peers should not be placed in the acting set + `_. PGBackend interfaces: