ceph/qa/suites/rados/thrash-old-clients/ceph.yaml

# Don't verify os + flavor + sha1
verify_ceph_hash: false
tasks:
- cephadm:
    conf:
      mon:
        auth allow insecure global id reclaim: true
qa/suites/rados/thrash-old-clients: disable verify_ceph_hash in this test, older ceph clients are installed on el7, but the ceph cluster is deployed using cephadm, which in turn pulls ceph container images built using the ceph being tested on el8. since we've dropped the build of master on el7, there is no need to verify if ceph package is available if cephadm is used for deploying the cluster. Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai <kchai@redhat.com> 2020-06-23 07:40:30 +00:00			`# Don't verify os + flavor + sha1`
			`verify_ceph_hash: false`
qa/suites/rados/thrash-old-clients: do some thrashing with jewel and luminous clients Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com> 2018-04-24 17:08:07 +00:00			`tasks:`
qa/suites/rados/thrash-old-clients: use cephadm - deploy cluster with cephadm so we can run a octopus+ cluster and also install client packages that are ancient. - move client.2 back onto the third node, since packages no longer conflict. - test on centos 7.x (i picked 6), since the old releases all built on that release. Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com> 2019-12-20 16:13:40 +00:00			`- cephadm:`
cephadm: set auth_allow_insecure_global_id_reclaim for mon on bootstrap If this is a fresh pacific cluster, let's assume that there won't be legacy clients connecting. (And if there are, let's put the burden on the user to enable them to do so insecurely.) This is in contrast to upgrades, where our focus is on not breaking anything. Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> 2021-03-26 16:02:50 +00:00			`conf:`
			`mon:`
			`auth allow insecure global id reclaim: true`