2019-04-13 09:29:04 +00:00
|
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
Partial Object Recovery
|
|
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-05 01:52:00 +00:00
|
|
|
Partial Object Recovery improves the efficiency of log-based recovery (vs
|
|
|
|
backfill). Original log-based recovery calculates missing_set based on pg_log
|
|
|
|
differences.
|
2019-04-13 09:29:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The whole object should be recovery from one OSD to another
|
|
|
|
if the object is indicated modified by pg_log regardless of how much
|
|
|
|
content in the object is really modified. That means a 4M object,
|
|
|
|
which is just modified 4k inside, should recovery the whole 4M object
|
|
|
|
rather than the modified 4k content. In addition, object map should be
|
|
|
|
also recovered even if it is not modified at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partial Object Recovery is designed to solve the problem mentioned above.
|
|
|
|
In order to achieve the goals, two things should be done:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. logging where the object is modified is necessary
|
2019-07-04 08:54:25 +00:00
|
|
|
2. logging whether the object_map of an object is modified is also necessary
|
2019-04-13 09:29:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ObjectCleanRegion is introduced to do what we want.
|
|
|
|
clean_offsets is a variable of interval_set<uint64_t>
|
|
|
|
and is used to indicate the unmodified content in an object.
|
|
|
|
clean_omap is a variable of bool indicating whether object_map is modified.
|
2019-05-05 06:05:15 +00:00
|
|
|
new_object means that osd does not exist for an object
|
2019-04-13 09:29:04 +00:00
|
|
|
max_num_intervals is an upbound of the number of intervals in clean_offsets
|
|
|
|
so that the memory cost of clean_offsets is always bounded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The shortest clean interval will be trimmed if the number of intervals
|
|
|
|
in clean_offsets exceeds the boundary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
etc. max_num_intervals=2, clean_offsets:{[5~10], [20~5]}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
then new interval [30~10] will evict out the shortest one [20~5]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
finally, clean_offsets becomes {[5~10], [30~10]}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Procedures for Partial Object Recovery
|
|
|
|
======================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firstly, OpContext and pg_log_entry_t should contain ObjectCleanRegion.
|
|
|
|
In do_osd_ops(), finish_copyfrom(), finish_promote(), corresponding content
|
|
|
|
in ObjectCleanRegion should mark dirty so that trace the modification of an object.
|
|
|
|
Also update ObjectCleanRegion in OpContext to its pg_log_entry_t.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondly, pg_missing_set can build and rebuild correctly.
|
|
|
|
when calculating pg_missing_set during peering process,
|
|
|
|
also merge ObjectCleanRegion in each pg_log_entry_t.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
etc. object aa has pg_log:
|
|
|
|
26'101 {[0~4096, 8192~MAX], false}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26'104 {0~8192, 12288~MAX, false}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28'108 {[0~12288, 16384~MAX], true}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
missing_set for object aa: merge pg_log above --> {[0~4096, 16384~MAX], true}.
|
|
|
|
which means 4096~16384 is modified and object_map is also modified on version 28'108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, OSD may be crash after merge log.
|
|
|
|
Therefore, we need to read_log and rebuild pg_missing_set. For example, pg_log is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
object aa: 26'101 {[0~4096, 8192~MAX], false}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
object bb: 26'102 {[0~4096, 8192~MAX], false}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
object cc: 26'103 {[0~4096, 8192~MAX], false}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
object aa: 26'104 {0~8192, 12288~MAX, false}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
object dd: 26'105 {[0~4096, 8192~MAX], false}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
object aa: 28'108 {[0~12288, 16384~MAX], true}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-01 09:56:25 +00:00
|
|
|
Originally, if bb,cc,dd is recovered, and aa is not.
|
2019-04-13 09:29:04 +00:00
|
|
|
So we need to rebuild pg_missing_set for object aa,
|
|
|
|
and find aa is modified on version 28'108.
|
|
|
|
If version in object_info is 26'96 < 28'108,
|
|
|
|
we don't need to consider 26'104 and 26'101 because the whole object will be recovered.
|
|
|
|
However, Partial Object Recovery should also require us to rebuild ObjectCleanRegion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knowing whether the object is modified is not enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therefore, we also need to traverse the pg_log before,
|
|
|
|
that says 26'104 and 26'101 also > object_info(26'96)
|
|
|
|
and rebuild pg_missing_set for object aa based on those three logs: 28'108, 26'104, 26'101.
|
|
|
|
The way how to merge logs is the same as mentioned above
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, finish the push and pull process based on pg_missing_set.
|
|
|
|
Updating copy_subset in recovery_info based on ObjectCleanRegion in pg_missing_set.
|
|
|
|
copy_subset indicates the intervals of content need to pull and push.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The complicated part here is submit_push_data
|
|
|
|
and serval cases should be considered separately.
|
|
|
|
what we need to consider is how to deal with the object data,
|
|
|
|
object data makes up of omap_header, xattrs, omap, data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case 1: first && complete: since object recovering is finished in a single PushOp,
|
|
|
|
we would like to preserve the original object and overwrite on the object directly.
|
|
|
|
Object will not be removed and touch a new one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issue 1: As object is not removed, old xattrs remain in the old object
|
|
|
|
but maybe updated in new object. Overwriting for the same key or adding new keys is correct,
|
|
|
|
but removing keys will be wrong.
|
|
|
|
In order to solve this issue, We need to remove the all original xattrs in the object, and then update new xattrs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issue 2: As object is not removed,
|
|
|
|
object_map may be recovered depending on the clean_omap.
|
|
|
|
Therefore, if recovering clean_omap, we need to remove old omap of the object for the same reason
|
|
|
|
since omap updating may also be a deletion.
|
|
|
|
Thus, in this case, we should do:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) clear xattrs of the object
|
|
|
|
2) clear omap of the object if omap recovery is needed
|
|
|
|
3) truncate the object into recovery_info.size
|
|
|
|
4) recovery omap_header
|
|
|
|
5) recovery xattrs, and recover omap if needed
|
|
|
|
6) punch zeros for original object if fiemap tells nothing there
|
|
|
|
7) overwrite object content which is modified
|
|
|
|
8) finish recovery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case 2: first && !complete: object recovering should be done in multiple times.
|
|
|
|
Here, target_oid will indicate a new temp_object in pgid_TEMP,
|
|
|
|
so the issues are a bit difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issue 1: As object is newly created, there is no need to deal with xattrs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issue 2: As object is newly created,
|
|
|
|
and object_map may not be transmitted depending on clean_omap.
|
|
|
|
Therefore, if clean_omap is true, we need to clone object_map from original object.
|
|
|
|
issue 3: As object is newly created, and unmodified data will not be transmitted.
|
|
|
|
Therefore, we need to clone unmodified data from the original object.
|
|
|
|
Thus, in this case, we should do:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) remove the temp object
|
|
|
|
2) create a new temp object
|
|
|
|
3) set alloc_hint for the new temp object
|
|
|
|
4) truncate new temp object to recovery_info.size
|
|
|
|
5) recovery omap_header
|
|
|
|
6) clone object_map from original object if omap is clean
|
|
|
|
7) clone unmodified object_data from original object
|
|
|
|
8) punch zeros for the new temp object
|
|
|
|
9) recovery xattrs, and recover omap if needed
|
|
|
|
10) overwrite object content which is modified
|
|
|
|
11) remove the original object
|
|
|
|
12) move and rename the new temp object to replace the original object
|
|
|
|
13) finish recovery
|