2012-10-30 18:20:51 +00:00
|
|
|
==============================================
|
2012-10-01 20:12:14 +00:00
|
|
|
Session Authentication for the Cephx Protocol
|
2012-10-30 18:20:51 +00:00
|
|
|
==============================================
|
2012-10-01 20:12:14 +00:00
|
|
|
Peter Reiher
|
|
|
|
7/30/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The original Cephx protocol authenticated the client to the authenticator and set up a session
|
2015-03-23 23:36:08 +00:00
|
|
|
key used to authenticate the client to the server it needs to talk to. It did not, however,
|
2012-10-01 20:12:14 +00:00
|
|
|
authenticate the ongoing messages between the client and server. Based on the fact that they
|
|
|
|
share a secret key, these ongoing session messages can be easily authenticated by using the
|
|
|
|
key to sign the messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document describes changes to the code that allow such ongoing session authentication.
|
|
|
|
The changes allow for future changes that permit other authentication protocols (and the
|
|
|
|
existing null NONE and UNKNOWN protocols) to handle signatures, but the only protocol that
|
|
|
|
actually does signatures, at the time of the writing, is the Cephx protocol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This code comes into play after the Cephx protocol has completed. At this point, the client and
|
|
|
|
server share a secret key. This key will be used for authentication. For other protocols, there
|
|
|
|
may or may not be such a key in place, and perhaps the actual procedures used to perform
|
|
|
|
signing will be different, so the code is written to be general.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "session" here is represented by an established pipe. For such pipes, there should be a
|
|
|
|
``session\_security`` structure attached to the pipe. Whenever a message is to be sent on the
|
|
|
|
pipe, code that handles the signature for this kind of session security will be called. On the
|
|
|
|
other end of the pipe, code that checks this kind of session security's message signatures will
|
|
|
|
be called. Messages that fail the signature check will not be processed further. That implies
|
|
|
|
that the sender had better be in agreement with the receiver on the session security being used,
|
|
|
|
since otherwise messages will be uniformly dropped between them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The code is also prepared to handle encryption and decryption of session messages, which would
|
2014-03-08 23:19:08 +00:00
|
|
|
add secrecy to the integrity provided by the signatures. No protocol currently implemented
|
2012-10-01 20:12:14 +00:00
|
|
|
encrypts the ongoing session messages, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For this functionality to work, several steps are required. First, the sender and receiver must have
|
2014-03-08 23:19:08 +00:00
|
|
|
a successful run of the cephx protocol to establish a shared key. They must store that key somewhere
|
2012-10-01 20:12:14 +00:00
|
|
|
that the pipe can get at later, to permit messages to be signed with it. Sent messages must be
|
|
|
|
signed, and received messages must have their signatures checked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The signature could be computed in a variety of ways, but currently its size is limited to 64 bits.
|
|
|
|
A message's signature is placed in its footer, in a field called ``sig``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The signature code in Cephx can be turned on and off at runtime, using a Ceph boolean option called
|
|
|
|
``cephx\_sign\_messages``. It is currently set to false, by default, so no messages will be signed. It
|
|
|
|
must be changed to true to cause signatures to be calculated and checked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storing the Key
|
2012-10-30 18:20:51 +00:00
|
|
|
---------------
|
2012-10-01 20:12:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key is needed to create signatures on the sending end and check signatures on the receiving end.
|
|
|
|
In the future, if asymmetric crypto is an option, it's possible that two keys (a private one for
|
|
|
|
this end of the pipe and a public one for the other end) would need to be stored. At this time,
|
|
|
|
messages going in both directions will be signed with the same key, so only that key needs to be
|
|
|
|
saved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key is saved when the pipe is established. On the client side, this happens in ``connect()``,
|
|
|
|
which is located in ``msg/Pipe.cc``. The key is obtained from a run of the Cephx protocol,
|
|
|
|
which results in a successfully checked authorizer structure. If there is such an authorizer
|
|
|
|
available, the code calls ``get\_auth\_session\_handler()`` to create a new authentication session handler
|
|
|
|
and stores it in the pipe data structure. On the server side, a similar thing is done in
|
|
|
|
``accept()`` after the authorizer provided by the client has been verified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once these things are done on either end of the connection, session authentication can start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These routines (``connect()`` and ``accept()``) are also used to handle situations where a new
|
|
|
|
session is being set up. At this stage, no authorizer has been created yet, so there's no key.
|
|
|
|
Special cases in the code that calls the signature code skip these calls when the
|
|
|
|
``CEPH\_AUTH\_UNKNOWN`` protocol is in use. This protocol label is on the pre-authorizer
|
|
|
|
messages in a session, indicating that negotiation on an authentication protocol is ongoing and
|
|
|
|
thus signature is not possible. There will be a reliable authentication operation later in this
|
|
|
|
session before anything sensitive should be passed, so this is not a security problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signing Messages
|
2012-10-30 18:20:51 +00:00
|
|
|
----------------
|
2012-10-01 20:12:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messages are signed in the ``write\_message`` call located in ``msg/Pipe.cc``. The actual
|
|
|
|
signature process is to encrypt the CRCs for the message using the shared key. Thus, we must
|
|
|
|
defer signing until all CRCs have been computed. The header CRC is computed last, so we
|
|
|
|
call ``sign\_message()`` as soon as we've calculated that CRC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``sign\_message()`` is a virtual function defined in ``auth/AuthSessionHandler.h``. Thus,
|
|
|
|
a specific version of it must be written for each authentication protocol supported. Currently,
|
|
|
|
only UNKNOWN, NONE and CEPHX are supported. So there is a separate version of ``sign\_message()`` in
|
|
|
|
``auth/unknown/AuthUnknownSessionHandler.h``, ``auth/none/AuthNoneSessionHandler.h`` and
|
|
|
|
``auth/cephx/CephxSessionHandler.cc``. The UNKNOWN and NONE versions simply return 0, indicating
|
|
|
|
success.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CEPHX version is more extensive. It is found in ``auth/cephx/CephxSessionHandler.cc``.
|
|
|
|
The first thing done is to determine if the run time option to handle signatures (see above) is on.
|
|
|
|
If not, the Cephx version of ``sign\_message()`` simply returns success without actually calculating
|
|
|
|
a signature or inserting it into the message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the run time option is enabled, ``sign\_message()`` copies all of the message's CRCs (one from the
|
|
|
|
header and three from the footer) into a buffer. It calls ``encode\_encrypt()`` on the buffer,
|
|
|
|
using the key obtained from the pipe's ``session\_security`` structure. 64 bits of the encrypted
|
|
|
|
result are put into the message footer's signature field and a footer flag is set to indicate that
|
|
|
|
the message was signed. (This flag is a sanity check. It is not regarded as definitive
|
|
|
|
evidence that the message was signed. The presence of a ``session\_security`` structure at the
|
|
|
|
receiving end requires a signature regardless of the value of this flag.) If this all goes well,
|
|
|
|
``sign\_message()`` returns 0. If there is a problem anywhere along the line and no signature
|
|
|
|
was computed, it returns ``SESSION\_SIGNATURE\_FAILURE``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking Signatures
|
2012-10-30 18:20:51 +00:00
|
|
|
-------------------
|
2012-10-01 20:12:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The signature is checked by a routine called ``check\_message\_signature()``. This is also a
|
|
|
|
virtual function, defined in ``auth/AuthSessionHandler.h``. So again there are specific versions
|
|
|
|
for supported authentication protocols, such as UNKNOWN, NONE and CEPHX. Again, the UNKNOWN and
|
|
|
|
NONE versions are stored in ``auth/unknown/AuthUnknownSessionHandler.h`` and
|
|
|
|
``auth/none/AuthNoneSessionHandler.h``, respectively, and again they simply return 0, indicating
|
|
|
|
success.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CEPHX version of ``check\_message\_signature()`` performs a real signature check. This routine
|
|
|
|
(stored in ``auth/cephx/CephxSessionHandler.cc``) exits with success if the run time option has
|
|
|
|
disabled signatures. Otherwise, it takes the CRCs from the header and footer, encrypts the result,
|
|
|
|
and compares it to the signature stored in the footer. Since an earlier routine has checked that
|
|
|
|
the CRCs actually match the contents of the message, it is unnecessary to recompute the CRCs
|
|
|
|
on the raw data in the message. The encryption is performed with the same ``encode\_encrypt()``
|
|
|
|
routine used on the sending end, using the key stored in the local ``session\_security``
|
|
|
|
data structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If everything checks out, the CEPHX routine returns 0, indicating succcess. If there is a
|
|
|
|
problem, the routine returns ``SESSION\_SIGNATURE\_FAILURE``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adding New Session Authentication Methods
|
2012-10-30 18:20:51 +00:00
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------
|
2012-10-01 20:12:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the purpose of session authentication only (not the basic authentication of client and
|
|
|
|
server currently performed by the Cephx protocol), in addition to adding a new protocol, that
|
|
|
|
protocol must have a ``sign\_message()`` routine and a ``check\_message\_signature`` routine.
|
|
|
|
These routines will take a message pointer as a parameter and return 0 on success. The procedure
|
|
|
|
used to sign and check will be specific to the new method, but probably there will be a
|
|
|
|
``session\_security`` structure attached to the pipe that contains a cryptographic key. This
|
|
|
|
structure will be either an ``AuthSessionHandler`` (found in ``auth/AuthSessionHandler.h``)
|
|
|
|
or a structure derived from that type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adding Encryption to Sessions
|
2012-10-30 18:20:51 +00:00
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
2012-10-01 20:12:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The existing code is partially, but not fully, set up to allow sessions to have their packets
|
|
|
|
encrypted. Part of adding encryption would be similar to adding a new authentication method.
|
2014-03-08 23:19:08 +00:00
|
|
|
But one would also need to add calls to the encryption and decryption routines in ``write\_message()``
|
|
|
|
and ``read\_message()``. These calls would probably go near where the current calls for
|
2012-10-01 20:12:14 +00:00
|
|
|
authentication are made. You should consider whether you want to replace the existing calls
|
|
|
|
with something more general that does whatever the chosen form of session security requires,
|
|
|
|
rather than explicitly saying ``sign`` or ``encrypt``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session Security Statistics
|
2012-10-30 18:20:51 +00:00
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
2012-10-01 20:12:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The existing Cephx authentication code keeps statistics on how many messages were signed, how
|
|
|
|
many message signature were checked, and how many checks succeeded and failed. It is prepared
|
|
|
|
to keep similar statistics on encryption and decryption. These statistics can be accessed through
|
|
|
|
the call ``printAuthSessionHandlerStats`` in ``auth/AuthSessionHandler.cc``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If new authentication or encryption methods are added, they should include code that keeps these
|
|
|
|
statistics.
|